nanog: by thread

• RSS Feed
• About List
• All Lists

Previous period

Next period

986 messages starting Feb 28 03 and ending Feb 04 23
Date index | Thread index | Author index

• Re: BGP to doom us all Avi Freedman (Feb 28)
  • Re: BGP to doom us all Paul Vixie (Feb 28)
    • Re: BGP to doom us all Vadim Antonov (Feb 28)
      • Re: BGP to doom us all Christopher L. Morrow (Mar 02)
    • Re: BGP to doom us all bmanning (Mar 01)
  • Re: BGP to doom us all Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 01)
  • Re: BGP to doom us all Jack Bates (Mar 03)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: BGP to doom us all Paul Ferguson (Mar 01)
  • Re: BGP to doom us all Neil J. McRae (Mar 01)
    • Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] Mark Radabaugh (Mar 01)
      • Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] Neil J. McRae (Mar 01)
      • Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] jlewis (Mar 01)
      • RE: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] Michael Hallgren (Mar 01)
      • Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] Richard A Steenbergen (Mar 01)
      • Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] Jeffrey Meltzer (Mar 01)
  • Re: BGP to doom us all Avi Freedman (Mar 01)
  • Re: BGP to doom us all Sean Donelan (Mar 01)
    • Re: BGP to doom us all Andy Dills (Mar 01)
  • Re: BGP to doom us all Avi Freedman (Mar 02)
    • Re: BGP to doom us all Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 02)
    • Re: BGP to doom us all Jack Bates (Mar 03)
      • Re: BGP to doom us all E.B. Dreger (Mar 03)
  • Re: BGP to doom us all Michael . Dillon (Mar 03)
    • Re: BGP to doom us all Stephane Bortzmeyer (Mar 03)
    • Re: BGP to doom us all bmanning (Mar 03)
  • RE: BGP to doom us all St. Clair, James (Mar 03)
  • RE: BGP to doom us all Kuhtz, Christian (Mar 03)
    • Re: BGP to doom us all bmanning (Mar 03)
    • Re: BGP to doom us all David Conrad (Mar 03)
  • Re: BGP to doom us all Michael . Dillon (Mar 03)
  • Re: BGP to doom us all Michael . Dillon (Mar 03)
    • Tools bmanning (Mar 03)
      • Re: Tools Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 03)
      • Re: Tools bmanning (Mar 03)
      • Re: Tools Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 03)
      • Re: Tools bmanning (Mar 03)
      • Re: Tools Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 03)
      • Re: Tools Andrew Newton (Mar 03)
  • Re: BGP to doom us all Michael . Dillon (Mar 03)
  • Re: BGP to doom us all Michael . Dillon (Mar 03)
  • Re: BGP to doom us all Michael . Dillon (Mar 04)
    • Re: BGP to doom us all Rafi Sadowsky (Mar 04)
    • Re: BGP to doom us all bmanning (Mar 04)
    • Re: BGP to doom us all Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 04)
  • Re: BGP to doom us all Daniel Karrenberg (Mar 04)
• Re: anti-spam vs network abuse jlewis (Feb 28)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: anti-spam vs network abuse jlewis (Feb 28)
    • Re: anti-spam vs network abuse up (Mar 01)
    • Re: anti-spam vs network abuse Paul Vixie (Mar 01)
  • Re: anti-spam vs network abuse Hank Nussbacher (Mar 01)
  • Re: anti-spam vs network abuse Michael Lamoureux (Mar 01)
    • Re: anti-spam vs network abuse jlewis (Mar 01)
    • Re: anti-spam vs network abuse Charlie Clemmer (Mar 01)
    • Message not available
      • Re: anti-spam vs network abuse Charlie Clemmer (Mar 01)
    • Re: anti-spam vs network abuse Andy Dills (Mar 01)
      • Re: anti-spam vs network abuse Michael Lamoureux (Mar 01)
    • Re: anti-spam vs network abuse Richard Irving (Mar 03)
• Alcatel Router experience, information Wayne Bogan (Mar 01)
• Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] Danny McPherson (Mar 01)
  • Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] Stephen J. Wilcox (Mar 01)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] Danny McPherson (Mar 01)
    • Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] Mark Radabaugh (Mar 01)
      • Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] Stephen J. Wilcox (Mar 01)
      • Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] Mark Radabaugh (Mar 01)
      • Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] alex (Mar 01)
      • Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] Joe Abley (Mar 02)
      • Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] alex (Mar 02)
      • Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] Joe Abley (Mar 02)
      • Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] David Barak (Mar 02)
      • Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] lhoward (Mar 03)
      • Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] David Barak (Mar 03)
      • Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] Sean Donelan (Mar 03)
      • Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] Jared Mauch (Mar 01)
      • Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] leo vegoda (Mar 05)
      • Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] bdragon (Mar 08)
  • Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] Danny McPherson (Mar 01)
  • RE: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] Jim Deleskie (Mar 03)
  • Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] Danny McPherson (Mar 03)
  • RE: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all] Jim Deleskie (Mar 03)
• DNS records for routers Pete Kruckenberg (Mar 01)
  • Re: DNS records for routers Petri Helenius (Mar 01)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: DNS records for routers Cutler, James R (Mar 03)
• Re: Root server error Nathan J. Mehl (Mar 01)
  • Re: Root server error Geo. (Mar 01)
    • Re: Root server error E.B. Dreger (Mar 01)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Root server error Matt Larson (Mar 06)
• Have address space? You too can make policy. Leo Bicknell (Mar 02)
  • Re: Have address space? You too can make policy. William Allen Simpson (Mar 02)
• look for contact @Nordnet France Pascal Gloor (Mar 03)
• OT: Need the name of a good Qwest account rep. joe mcguckin (Mar 03)
• Fw: ISS Security Brief: Remote Sendmail Header Processing Vulnerability Matt Fearnow (Mar 03)
• spamcop.net? blitz (Mar 03)
  • Re: spamcop.net? Will Yardley (Mar 03)
  • Re: spamcop.net? Christopher L. Morrow (Mar 03)
  • Message not available
    • Re: spamcop.net? Martin Hannigan (Mar 03)
      • Re: spamcop.net? Christopher L. Morrow (Mar 03)
      • Re: spamcop.net? Stephen Sprunk (Mar 04)
      • Re: spamcop.net? blitz (Mar 04)
      • Re: spamcop.net? chuck goolsbee (Mar 04)
      • Re: spamcop.net? Paul Vixie (Mar 04)
  • Message not available
    • RE: spamcop.net? blitz (Mar 04)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: spamcop.net? Peter Salus (Mar 04)
• Why replicate the DNS? Michael . Dillon (Mar 04)
  • Re: Why replicate the DNS? Joe Abley (Mar 05)
    • Re: Why replicate the DNS? Eric A. Hall (Mar 06)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Why replicate the DNS? Michael . Dillon (Mar 06)
• nntp peering question Scott Granados (Mar 04)
• Using HINFO (was Re: spamcop.net?) Sean Donelan (Mar 05)
• OT: level3 contact Steve Rude (Mar 05)
  • Re: OT: level3 contact Andy Dills (Mar 05)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: OT: level3 contact Kris Foster (Mar 05)
    • RE: OT: level3 contact Andy Dills (Mar 05)
      • RE: OT: level3 contact Daniel Golding (Mar 05)
      • Re: OT: level3 contact joe mcguckin (Mar 05)
      • Re: OT: level3 contact Richard A Steenbergen (Mar 05)
  • RE: OT: level3 contact Steve Rude (Mar 05)
• RE: level3 contact Temkin, David (Mar 05)
• IPv4 Addresses update John L Crain (Mar 05)
• ISP recommendation for Mumbai JMDejaInfo (Mar 06)
• Abstract of proposed Internet Draft for Best Current Practice (please comment) Dr. Jeffrey Race (Mar 06)
  • Re: Abstract of proposed Internet Draft for Best Current Practice (please comment) Andy Dills (Mar 06)
  • Re: Abstract of proposed Internet Draft for Best Current Practice (please comment) Peter Galbavy (Mar 07)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Abstract of proposed Internet Draft for Best Current Practice (please comment) Dr. Jeffrey Race (Mar 06)
  • Re: Abstract of proposed Internet Draft for Best Current Practice (please comment) Dr. Jeffrey Race (Mar 07)
  • Re: Abstract of proposed Internet Draft for Best Current Practice (please comment) Peter Galbavy (Mar 07)
  • Re: Abstract of proposed Internet Draft for Best Current Practice (please comment) Andy Dills (Mar 07)
• Re: [Re: Abstract of proposed Internet Draft for Best Current Practice (please comment)] Joshua Smith (Mar 06)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Re: Abstract of proposed Internet Draft for Best Current Practice (please comment)] Dr. Jeffrey Race (Mar 06)
• 60 Hudson Jeffrey Meltzer (Mar 06)
• Tech contact for IXEurope/ixsolutions? Danny (Mar 06)
• The Cidr Report cidr-report (Mar 07)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • The Cidr Report cidr-report (Mar 14)
  • The Cidr Report cidr-report (Mar 21)
  • The Cidr Report cidr-report (Mar 28)
• 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Eric Germann (Mar 07)
  • Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Dave Israel (Mar 07)
    • Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Stephen J. Wilcox (Mar 07)
      • Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Robert E. Seastrom (Mar 07)
      • Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Richard A Steenbergen (Mar 07)
      • Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Mikael Abrahamsson (Mar 07)
      • Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Richard A Steenbergen (Mar 07)
      • Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... David G. Andersen (Mar 07)
      • Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Marshall Eubanks (Mar 07)
      • Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Marshall Eubanks (Mar 07)
      • Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... fingers (Mar 07)
      • Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Matt Zimmerman (Mar 07)
      • Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Stephen J. Wilcox (Mar 07)
      • Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Richard A Steenbergen (Mar 07)
      • Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... E.B. Dreger (Mar 07)
      • Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Jason Slagle (Mar 08)
      • Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... alex (Mar 08)
      • Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Hank Nussbacher (Mar 08)
      • Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Sean M . Doran (Mar 07)
      • Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Hank Nussbacher (Mar 08)
      • Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Stephen Sprunk (Mar 08)
      • Message not available
      • Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Dave Israel (Mar 07)
      • Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Peter Galbavy (Mar 08)
    • Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 07)
    • Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Christopher L. Morrow (Mar 07)
  • Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Stretch (Mar 07)
  • Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Richard A Steenbergen (Mar 07)
    • Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Andy Dills (Mar 07)
  • Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Adam Kujawski (Mar 07)
    • Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Scott Weeks (Mar 07)
      • Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Miles Fidelman (Mar 07)
  • Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Majdi S. Abbas (Mar 07)
    • Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Andrew Dorsett (Mar 07)
      • Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... E.B. Dreger (Mar 07)
    • Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Hank Nussbacher (Mar 08)
      • Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Jessica Yu (Mar 08)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Peter Salus (Mar 07)
  • RE: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Cottrell, Les (Mar 08)
    • Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Marshall Eubanks (Mar 08)
  • RE: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Pete Templin (Mar 10)
    • Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Marshall Eubanks (Mar 10)
• UK ISPs not cooperating with law enforcement Sean Donelan (Mar 07)
  • Re: UK ISPs not cooperating with law enforcement Dan Hollis (Mar 07)
  • Re: UK ISPs not cooperating with law enforcement- COPA Enforcement BAN Richard Irving (Mar 07)
  • RE: UK ISPs not cooperating with law enforcement Mark Borchers (Mar 07)
    • RE: UK ISPs not cooperating with law enforcement Dan Hollis (Mar 07)
      • Re: UK ISPs not cooperating with law enforcement Peter Galbavy (Mar 10)
      • Re: UK ISPs not cooperating with law enforcement Roland Perry (Mar 10)
    • Re: UK ISPs not cooperating with law enforcement Steven M. Bellovin (Mar 07)
  • Re: UK ISPs not cooperating with law enforcement Neil J. McRae (Mar 08)
• 69/8...this sucks jlewis (Mar 07)
  • Re: 69/8...this sucks william (Mar 07)
  • Re: 69/8...this sucks Jack Bates (Mar 07)
    • Re: 69/8...this sucks Jeff S Wheeler (Mar 10)
      • Re: 69/8...this sucks Stephen J. Wilcox (Mar 10)
      • Re: 69/8...this sucks E.B. Dreger (Mar 10)
      • Re: 69/8...this sucks Kevin Loch (Mar 10)
      • Re: 69/8...this sucks jlewis (Mar 10)
      • Re: 69/8...this sucks E.B. Dreger (Mar 10)
      • Re: 69/8...this sucks Jared Mauch (Mar 10)
      • Re: 69/8...this sucks Charles Sprickman (Mar 10)
      • Re: 69/8...this sucks Doug Barton (Mar 10)
      • Re: 69/8...this sucks E.B. Dreger (Mar 10)
      • Re: 69/8...this sucks Doug Barton (Mar 10)
      • Re: 69/8...this sucks E.B. Dreger (Mar 10)
      • Re: 69/8...this sucks Stephen J. Wilcox (Mar 11)
      • Bogon and anti-spoof filters Simon Brilus (Mar 11)
      • Re: Bogon and anti-spoof filters Neil J. McRae (Mar 11)
      • Re: Bogon and anti-spoof filters Simon Brilus (Mar 11)
      • Re: Bogon and anti-spoof filters Jack Bates (Mar 11)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: 69/8...this sucks Michael . Dillon (Mar 10)
    • Re: 69/8...this sucks E.B. Dreger (Mar 10)
  • RE: 69/8...this sucks McBurnett, Jim (Mar 10)
  • RE: 69/8...this sucks McBurnett, Jim (Mar 10)
    • Re: 69/8...this sucks Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 10)
  • RE: 69/8...this sucks Frank Scalzo (Mar 10)
    • RE: 69/8...this sucks E.B. Dreger (Mar 10)
    • RE: 69/8...this sucks Rob Thomas (Mar 10)
    • scope of the 69/8 problem E.B. Dreger (Mar 10)
      • Re: scope of the 69/8 problem Stephen Sprunk (Mar 11)
      • Re: scope of the 69/8 problem jlewis (Mar 11)
      • Re: scope of the 69/8 problem bdragon (Mar 19)
  • Re: 69/8...this sucks Brandon Butterworth (Mar 10)
    • Re: 69/8...this sucks Joel Jaeggli (Mar 10)
      • Re: 69/8...this sucks Owen DeLong (Mar 10)
      • Re: 69/8...this sucks Hank Nussbacher (Mar 11)
      • Re: 69/8...this sucks Stephen J. Wilcox (Mar 11)
      • Re: 69/8...this sucks Owen DeLong (Mar 11)
  • RE: 69/8...this sucks Frank Scalzo (Mar 10)
    • RE: 69/8...this sucks jlewis (Mar 10)
      • Re: 69/8...this sucks Jack Bates (Mar 10)
      • RE: 69/8...this sucks Haesu (Mar 10)
      • Re: 69/8...this sucks Joe Boyce (Mar 11)
      • Re: 69/8...this sucks Owen DeLong (Mar 11)
      • Re: 69/8...this sucks Richard A Steenbergen (Mar 11)
      • Re: 69/8...this sucks Andy Dills (Mar 11)
      • Re: 69/8...this sucks Randy Bush (Mar 11)
      • Re: 69/8...this sucks Alec H. Peterson (Mar 11)
      • Re: 69/8...this sucks william (Mar 11)
      • Re: 69/8...this sucks Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 12)
      • Re: 69/8...this sucks Randy Bush (Mar 12)
      • Re: 69/8...this sucks Andy Dills (Mar 12)
      • Re: 69/8...this sucks Peter E. Fry (Mar 12)
      • Re: 69/8...this sucks Andy Dills (Mar 12)
      • Re: 69/8...this sucks Charles Sprickman (Mar 11)
      • Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) JC Dill (Mar 11)
      • Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) Richard A Steenbergen (Mar 11)
      • Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) wireworks (Mar 11)
      • Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) JC Dill (Mar 11)
      • Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) Richard A Steenbergen (Mar 11)
      • Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) Adam Rothschild (Mar 11)
      • Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) Greg Maxwell (Mar 12)
      • Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) JC Dill (Mar 12)
      • gender and nanog Randy Bush (Mar 12)
      • route filtering in large networks Andy Dills (Mar 12)
      • Re: route filtering in large networks Richard A Steenbergen (Mar 12)
      • Re: route filtering in large networks Jack Bates (Mar 12)
      • RE: route filtering in large networks Michael K. Smith (Mar 12)
      • Re: route filtering in large networks Jack Bates (Mar 12)
      • Re: route filtering in large networks Peter E. Fry (Mar 12)
      • Re: route filtering in large networks Christopher L. Morrow (Mar 12)
      • Re: route filtering in large networks Rob Thomas (Mar 12)
      • Re: route filtering in large networks Randy Bush (Mar 12)
      • Re: route filtering in large networks E.B. Dreger (Mar 13)
      • Re: route filtering in large networks Lars Erik Gullerud (Mar 13)
      • Re: route filtering in large networks Alan Hannan (Mar 12)
      • Re: route filtering in large networks Randy Bush (Mar 12)
      • Re: route filtering in large networks Andy Dills (Mar 12)
      • Re: route filtering in large networks Randy Bush (Mar 13)
      • Re: route filtering in large networks Dorian Kim (Mar 13)
      • Re: route filtering in large networks Stephen Sprunk (Mar 13)
      • Re: route filtering in large networks Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 13)
      • IETF BOF on Network Configuration (netconf) Sean Donelan (Mar 13)
      • RE: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) Vivien M. (Mar 12)
      • Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) Jack Bates (Mar 12)
      • RE: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) Vivien M. (Mar 12)
      • Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) Andy Dills (Mar 12)
      • Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 12)
      • Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) Owen DeLong (Mar 13)
      • Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) Owen DeLong (Mar 13)
      • Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) Stephen Sprunk (Mar 12)
      • Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) Tim Thorne (Mar 12)
      • Re: 69/8...this sucks Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 12)
      • Re: 69/8...this sucks Niels Bakker (Mar 13)
      • Re: 69/8...this sucks Andy Dills (Mar 11)
      • Re: 69/8...this sucks Jack Bates (Mar 11)
      • Re: 69/8...this sucks ed (Mar 11)
      • Re: 69/8...this sucks Stephen Sprunk (Mar 12)
  • Re: 69/8...this sucks Michael . Dillon (Mar 11)
    • Re: 69/8...this sucks Owen DeLong (Mar 11)
  • RE: 69/8...this sucks Ejay Hire (Mar 11)
    • RE: 69/8...this sucks Andy Dills (Mar 11)
      • Re: 69/8...this sucks Larry J. Blunk (Mar 11)
      • RE: 69/8...this sucks Rick Duff (Mar 11)
      • RE: 69/8...this sucks Andy Dills (Mar 11)
    • RE: 69/8...this sucks Owen DeLong (Mar 11)
      • RE: 69/8...this sucks Andy Dills (Mar 11)
      • RE: 69/8...this sucks Owen DeLong (Mar 11)
      • RE: 69/8...this sucks Rob Thomas (Mar 11)
      • RE: 69/8...this sucks Scott Granados (Mar 11)
      • RE: 69/8...this sucks Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 11)
      • RE: 69/8...this sucks David Luyer (Mar 12)
      • RE: 69/8...this sucks Stephen J. Wilcox (Mar 12)
      • RE: 69/8...this sucks David Luyer (Mar 12)
      • RE: 69/8...this sucks Owen DeLong (Mar 12)
  • Re: 69/8...this sucks Larry J. Blunk (Mar 11)
• RE: Abstract of proposed Internet Draft for Best Current Practic e (please comment) cproctor (Mar 07)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Abstract of proposed Internet Draft for Best Current Practic e (please comment) Cutler, James R (Mar 10)
• Clueful Engineer at C&W Needed - OC-3 Problem Gordon Ewasiuk (Mar 08)
• Building Cited for Housing Fuel Tanks Catches Fire [NYT] David Lesher (Mar 08)
  • Re: Building Cited for Housing Fuel Tanks Catches Fire [NYT] Randy Bush (Mar 08)
    • Re: Building Cited for Housing Fuel Tanks Catches Fire [NYT] David Lesher (Mar 08)
    • Re: Building Cited for Housing Fuel Tanks Catches Fire [NYT] Stephen Sprunk (Mar 08)
      • Re: Building Cited for Housing Fuel Tanks Catches Fire [NYT] David Lesher (Mar 08)
      • Re: Building Cited for Housing Fuel Tanks Catches Fire [NYT] Sean Donelan (Mar 08)
  • Re: Building Cited for Housing Fuel Tanks Catches Fire [NYT] Lucy E. Lynch (Mar 08)
    • Re: Building Cited for Housing Fuel Tanks Catches Fire [NYT] David Lesher (Mar 08)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Building Cited for Housing Fuel Tanks Catches Fire [NYT] Michael . Dillon (Mar 10)
    • Re: Building Cited for Housing Fuel Tanks Catches Fire [NYT] Bradley Dunn (Mar 10)
      • Re: Building Cited for Housing Fuel Tanks Catches Fire [NYT] E.B. Dreger (Mar 10)
• Re: 923Mbits/s across the ocean Cottrell, Les (Mar 08)
  • Re: 923Mbits/s across the ocean E.B. Dreger (Mar 08)
  • Re: 923Mbits/s across the ocean alex (Mar 08)
    • Re: 923Mbits/s across the ocean David G. Andersen (Mar 08)
      • Re: 923Mbits/s across the ocean alex (Mar 08)
      • Re: 923Mbits/s across the ocean Douglas F. Calvert (Mar 10)
  • Re: 923Mbits/s across the ocean Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 08)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: 923Mbits/s across the ocean Cottrell, Les (Mar 08)
    • RE: 923Mbits/s across the ocean alex (Mar 08)
    • RE: 923Mbits/s across the ocean E.B. Dreger (Mar 08)
  • RE: 923Mbits/s across the ocean Cottrell, Les (Mar 08)
  • Re: 923Mbits/s across the ocean Joe St Sauver (Mar 08)
    • Re: 923Mbits/s across the ocean Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 09)
      • Re: 923Mbits/s across the ocean David G. Andersen (Mar 09)
  • RE: 923Mbits/s across the ocean Cottrell, Les (Mar 08)
  • RE: 923Mbits/s across the ocean Cottrell, Les (Mar 09)
    • Re: 923Mbits/s across the ocean Richard A Steenbergen (Mar 09)
      • Re: 923Mbits/s across the ocean Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 10)
      • Re: 923Mbits/s across the ocean Richard A Steenbergen (Mar 10)
      • Re: 923Mbits/s across the ocean Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 11)
      • Re: 923Mbits/s across the ocean William Allen Simpson (Mar 15)
      • Re: 923Mbits/s across the ocean Stephen Sprunk (Mar 11)
  • RE: 923Mbits/s across the ocean Antony Antony (Mar 09)
• Port 80 Issues John Murphy (Mar 08)
  • Re: Port 80 Issues Richard A Steenbergen (Mar 08)
  • Port 445 issues (was: Port 80 Issues) Johannes Ullrich (Mar 09)
    • Re: Port 445 issues (was: Port 80 Issues) james (Mar 09)
      • Re: Port 445 issues (was: Port 80 Issues) Jonathan Claybaugh (Mar 09)
      • Re: Port 445 issues (was: Port 80 Issues) Johannes Ullrich (Mar 09)
      • Re: Port 445 issues (was: Port 80 Issues) james (Mar 09)
      • Re: Port 445 issues (was: Port 80 Issues) Sean Donelan (Mar 09)
      • Re: Port 445 issues (was: Port 80 Issues) Jack Bates (Mar 09)
      • Re: Port 445 issues (was: Port 80 Issues) james (Mar 09)
      • Re: Port 445 issues (was: Port 80 Issues) Vadim Antonov (Mar 10)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Port 80 Issues John Murphy (Mar 08)
    • Re: Port 80 Issues John Murphy (Mar 08)
      • Re: Port 80 Issues Sean Donelan (Mar 08)
• Question concerning authoritative bodies. Jack Bates (Mar 09)
  • Re: Question concerning authoritative bodies. Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 09)
    • Re: Question concerning authoritative bodies. Jack Bates (Mar 09)
      • Re: Question concerning authoritative bodies. Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 09)
      • Re: Question concerning authoritative bodies. Jack Bates (Mar 09)
      • Re: Question concerning authoritative bodies. jlewis (Mar 09)
  • Re: Question concerning authoritative bodies. jlewis (Mar 09)
    • Re: Question concerning authoritative bodies. E.B. Dreger (Mar 09)
      • Re: Question concerning authoritative bodies. J.A. Terranson (Mar 09)
      • Re: Question concerning authoritative bodies. jlewis (Mar 09)
      • Re: Question concerning authoritative bodies. up (Mar 09)
    • Re: Question concerning authoritative bodies. Ron da Silva (Mar 11)
      • Re: Question concerning authoritative bodies. jlewis (Mar 11)
      • Re: Question concerning authoritative bodies. Andy Walden (Mar 11)
      • Re: Question concerning authoritative bodies. Ron da Silva (Mar 12)
      • Re: Question concerning authoritative bodies. jlewis (Mar 12)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Question concerning authoritative bodies. McBurnett, Jim (Mar 09)
• RE: Abstract of proposed Internet Draft for Best Current Practic e (please comment) Dr. Jeffrey Race (Mar 10)
  • RE: Abstract of proposed Internet Draft for Best Current Practic e (please comment) E.B. Dreger (Mar 10)
  • RE: Abstract of proposed Internet Draft for Best Current Practic e (please comment) David Barak (Mar 10)
• RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Mark Segal (Mar 10)
  • RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. E.B. Dreger (Mar 10)
    • RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. jlewis (Mar 10)
      • RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Stephen J. Wilcox (Mar 10)
      • Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Joe Boyce (Mar 10)
  • RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Haesu (Mar 10)
    • Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Joe Abley (Mar 10)
  • RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Christopher L. Morrow (Mar 10)
    • RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. E.B. Dreger (Mar 10)
      • RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Christopher L. Morrow (Mar 10)
      • RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Barry Raveendran Greene (Mar 10)
      • RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. E.B. Dreger (Mar 10)
      • Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Daniel Roesen (Mar 10)
      • Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. E.B. Dreger (Mar 10)
  • Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Jack Bates (Mar 10)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Mark Segal (Mar 10)
  • RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Mark Segal (Mar 10)
    • RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Haesu (Mar 10)
  • RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Michael . Dillon (Mar 10)
    • RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Rob Thomas (Mar 10)
      • Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. James-lists (Mar 10)
  • RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Michael . Dillon (Mar 10)
  • Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Michael . Dillon (Mar 10)
  • RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. McBurnett, Jim (Mar 10)
    • Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Jack Bates (Mar 10)
      • Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Russell Heilling (Mar 10)
  • RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. McBurnett, Jim (Mar 10)
  • RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Michael Whisenant (Mar 10)
    • RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. jlewis (Mar 10)
      • RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Michael Whisenant (Mar 11)
    • Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Chris Adams (Mar 10)
  • RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Todd A. Blank (Mar 10)
    • RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Simon Lyall (Mar 10)
      • Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Jack Bates (Mar 10)
      • RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. jlewis (Mar 10)
      • 202/7 (RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering..) E.B. Dreger (Mar 10)
      • Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Ray Bellis (Mar 10)
      • Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Jack Bates (Mar 10)
      • Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Stephen Sprunk (Mar 11)
      • Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. jlewis (Mar 11)
      • Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Shane Kerr (Mar 14)
    • RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 11)
      • Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Jack Bates (Mar 11)
      • Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 11)
      • Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Peter Galbavy (Mar 11)
      • Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 11)
      • Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Jack Bates (Mar 11)
  • RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. McBurnett, Jim (Mar 10)
    • RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Owen DeLong (Mar 11)
  • RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Dr. Jeffrey Race (Mar 10)
• Re: [Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering..] Joshua Smith (Mar 10)
• Fwd: Re. Port 445 issues (was: Port 80 Issues) Jonathan Claybaugh (Mar 10)
• RE: scope of the 69/8 problem Cutler, James R (Mar 10)
  • RE: scope of the 69/8 problem E.B. Dreger (Mar 10)
• Move all 9-1-1 to 8-5-5 Sean Donelan (Mar 10)
  • Issue with 208.192.0.0/8 - 208.196.93.0/24? chuck goolsbee (Mar 10)
    • Re: Issue with 208.192.0.0/8 - 208.196.93.0/24? Christopher L. Morrow (Mar 10)
    • Re: Issue with 208.192.0.0/8 - 208.196.93.0/24? chuck goolsbee (Mar 10)
  • RE: Move all 9-1-1 to 8-5-5 Vivien M. (Mar 10)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Move all 9-1-1 to 8-5-5 Michael . Dillon (Mar 11)
  • RE: Move all 9-1-1 to 8-5-5 Mark Segal (Mar 11)
    • RE: Move all 9-1-1 to 8-5-5 jlewis (Mar 11)
  • RE: Move all 9-1-1 to 8-5-5 McBurnett, Jim (Mar 11)
• Re: Issue with 208.192.0.0/8 - 208.196.93.0/24? Dr. Jeffrey Race (Mar 10)
  • Re: Issue with 208.192.0.0/8 - 208.196.93.0/24? alex (Mar 11)
  • Re: Issue with 208.192.0.0/8 - 208.196.93.0/24? E.B. Dreger (Mar 11)
    • Re: Issue with 208.192.0.0/8 - 208.196.93.0/24? Stephen J. Wilcox (Mar 11)
      • Re: Issue with 208.192.0.0/8 - 208.196.93.0/24? Peter Galbavy (Mar 11)
      • Re: Issue with 208.192.0.0/8 - 208.196.93.0/24? Scott Francis (Mar 17)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Issue with 208.192.0.0/8 - 208.196.93.0/24? McBurnett, Jim (Mar 11)
    • RE: Issue with 208.192.0.0/8 - 208.196.93.0/24? alex (Mar 11)
      • RE: Issue with 208.192.0.0/8 - 208.196.93.0/24? chuck goolsbee (Mar 11)
  • RE: Issue with 208.192.0.0/8 - 208.196.93.0/24? Callis, Adam (Mar 11)
  • RE: Issue with 208.192.0.0/8 - 208.196.93.0/24? McBurnett, Jim (Mar 11)
• 69/8 compelling content? Simon Waters (Mar 11)
• OT: Increasing Cell Phone Signal inside a NOC? Spencer . Wood (Mar 11)
  • Re: OT: Increasing Cell Phone Signal inside a NOC? Andrew Dorsett (Mar 11)
  • Re: OT: Increasing Cell Phone Signal inside a NOC? Bradley Dunn (Mar 11)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: OT: Increasing Cell Phone Signal inside a NOC? Michael . Dillon (Mar 12)
    • Re: OT: Increasing Cell Phone Signal inside a NOC? Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 12)
      • Re: OT: Increasing Cell Phone Signal inside a NOC? K. Graham (Mar 12)
      • Re: OT: Increasing Cell Phone Signal inside a NOC? Andrew Dorsett (Mar 12)
  • RE: OT: Increasing Cell Phone Signal inside a NOC? Huopio Kauto (Mar 12)
    • Re: OT: Increasing Cell Phone Signal inside a NOC? Petri Helenius (Mar 12)
      • Re: OT: Increasing Cell Phone Signal inside a NOC? Michael C. Wu (Mar 15)
    • RE: OT: Increasing Cell Phone Signal inside a NOC? Robert M. Enger (Mar 12)
• RE: Increasing Cell Phone Signal inside a NOC? Mike Damm (Mar 11)
• 69/8 problem -- Would CNN care? Lee Watterworth (Mar 11)
  • Re: 69/8 problem -- Would CNN care? Jared Mauch (Mar 11)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: 69/8 problem -- Would CNN care? Lee Watterworth (Mar 12)
    • Re: 69/8 problem -- Would CNN care? Jack Bates (Mar 12)
      • Message not available
      • Re: 69/8 problem -- Would CNN care? Jack Bates (Mar 12)
• [no subject] Stephen Gill (Mar 11)
• RE: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) McBurnett, Jim (Mar 11)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) Todd A. Blank (Mar 11)
• Increase in packet loss from the west coast Sean Donelan (Mar 11)
• Route Supression Problem Jack Bates (Mar 12)
  • Re: Route Supression Problem Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 12)
    • Re: Route Supression Problem Randy Bush (Mar 12)
      • Re: Route Supression Problem Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 12)
      • Re: Route Supression Problem Peter E. Fry (Mar 12)
      • Re: Route Supression Problem Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 12)
      • Re: Route Supression Problem Vadim Antonov (Mar 12)
  • Re: Route Supression Problem John Kristoff (Mar 12)
  • Re: Route Supression Problem Randy Bush (Mar 12)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Route Supression Problem Michael . Dillon (Mar 12)
    • Re: Route Supression Problem Adam Rothschild (Mar 12)
  • Re: Route Supression Problem Danny McPherson (Mar 12)
    • Re: Route Supression Problem Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 12)
      • Re: Route Supression Problem Jack Bates (Mar 12)
  • Re: Route Supression Problem Danny McPherson (Mar 12)
  • Re: Route Supression Problem Danny McPherson (Mar 12)
• Re: [Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks)] Joshua Smith (Mar 12)
• 69/8 is harder to fix than it looks at first glance Michael . Dillon (Mar 12)
  • Re: 69/8 is harder to fix than it looks at first glance Joe Abley (Mar 12)
• cw to att? issue? Scott Granados (Mar 12)
  • Re: cw to att? issue? Shon Elliott (Mar 12)
  • Re: cw to att? issue? Mark Kasten (Mar 12)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: cw to att? issue? Scott Granados (Mar 12)
    • Re: cw to att? issue? Richard A Steenbergen (Mar 12)
      • Re: cw to att? issue? Scott Granados (Mar 12)
      • Re: cw to att? issue? jlewis (Mar 12)
      • Re: cw to att? issue? Haesu (Mar 12)
      • Re: cw to att? issue? Thomas Kernen (Mar 13)
      • Re: cw to att? issue? Rob Thomas (Mar 12)
• Getting a Host Record Crist J. Clark (Mar 12)
  • Re: Getting a Host Record Will Yardley (Mar 12)
  • Re: Getting a Host Record william (Mar 12)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Getting a Host Record Gregory Hicks (Mar 13)
• Gender and other protocol issues Cutler, James R (Mar 12)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Gender and other protocol issues Todd A. Blank (Mar 12)
  • RE: Gender and other protocol issues Michael . Dillon (Mar 13)
• att.net domain expired Ejay Hire (Mar 13)
  • Re: att.net domain expired Bruce Pinsky (Mar 13)
  • Re: att.net domain expired william (Mar 13)
    • Re: att.net domain expired Richard A Steenbergen (Mar 13)
  • Re: att.net domain expired Sean Donelan (Mar 13)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: att.net domain expired Ejay Hire (Mar 13)
• RE: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this [degenerate linguistic usage elided) Dr. Jeffrey Race (Mar 13)
  • Amateurs suck (was [snip] (was Re: 69/8...this [degenerate linguistic usage elided)) Etaoin Shrdlu (Mar 13)
    • Re: Amateurs suck (was [snip] (was Re: 69/8...this [degenerate linguistic usage elided)) Lucy E. Lynch (Mar 13)
• Ability of Genuity to rate limit on a /24 boundary Josh Brooks (Mar 13)
• RE: Open source / GPL Ip address management software. Bowers, Brent (CCI-San Diego) (Mar 13)
• DSL-IP Probes Curiousity.. McBurnett, Jim (Mar 13)
  • Re: DSL-IP Probes Curiousity.. Sean Donelan (Mar 13)
    • Re: DSL-IP Probes Curiousity.. Scott Granados (Mar 13)
  • Re: DSL-IP Probes Curiousity.. batz (Mar 13)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: DSL-IP Probes Curiousity.. Mike Tancsa (Mar 13)
  • RE: DSL-IP Probes Curiousity.. McBurnett, Jim (Mar 14)
• Re: I need help finding SAN-FRANCISCO.CA.US Registrar Paul Vixie (Mar 13)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: I need help finding SAN-FRANCISCO.CA.US Registrar Matthew Kaufman (Mar 13)
• [Q] Stable Service Provider IOS Version? Matt Martini (Mar 14)
  • Re: [Q] Stable Service Provider IOS Version? Daniel Concepcion (Mar 15)
• [Fwd: FC: Email a RoadRunner address, get scanned by their securitysystem] William Allen Simpson (Mar 14)
  • Re: FC: Email a RoadRunner address, get scanned by their securitysystem] Jack Bates (Mar 14)
    • Re: FC: Email a RoadRunner address, get scanned by their securitysystem] Jeremy T. Bouse (Mar 14)
      • Re: FC: Email a RoadRunner address, get scanned by their securitysystem] John R. Levine (Mar 15)
  • Re: [Fwd: FC: Email a RoadRunner address, get scanned by their Jeff Kell (Mar 14)
    • Re: [Fwd: FC: Email a RoadRunner address, get scanned by their jlewis (Mar 14)
      • Re: [Fwd: FC: Email a RoadRunner address, get scanned by their Jack Bates (Mar 14)
  • Re: [Fwd: FC: Email a RoadRunner address, get scanned by their securitysystem] John Payne (Mar 14)
• * * * SECURITY UPDATE * * * MRLG-4.2.4 Released * * * (fwd) John Payne (Mar 14)
• Req contact: "Kindhosts", PA Avleen Vig (Mar 15)
• Re: [Fwd: FC: Email a RoadRunner address, get scanned by their jlewis (Mar 16)
  • Re: [Fwd: FC: Email a RoadRunner address, get scanned by their Jack Bates (Mar 16)
• APNIC returning 223/8 to IANA John Tran (Mar 16)
  • Re: APNIC returning 223/8 to IANA Andy Dills (Mar 16)
    • Re: APNIC returning 223/8 to IANA Richard A Steenbergen (Mar 16)
      • Re: APNIC returning 223/8 to IANA Jared Mauch (Mar 16)
      • Re: APNIC returning 223/8 to IANA Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 16)
      • Re: APNIC returning 223/8 to IANA Philip Smith (Mar 16)
      • Re: APNIC returning 223/8 to IANA Leo Bicknell (Mar 17)
      • Re: APNIC returning 223/8 to IANA jlewis (Mar 17)
      • Re: APNIC returning 223/8 to IANA bmanning (Mar 17)
      • Re: APNIC returning 223/8 to IANA Leo Bicknell (Mar 17)
      • Re: APNIC returning 223/8 to IANA bdragon (Mar 20)
      • Re: APNIC returning 223/8 to IANA Stephen J. Wilcox (Mar 20)
      • Re: APNIC returning 223/8 to IANA bdragon (Mar 21)
      • RE: APNIC returning 223/8 to IANA Mark Borchers (Mar 17)
    • Re: APNIC returning 223/8 to IANA Sean Donelan (Mar 16)
• OpenSSL Len Rose (Mar 17)
  • Re: OpenSSL Scott Francis (Mar 17)
    • Re: OpenSSL Steven M. Bellovin (Mar 17)
      • Re: OpenSSL Scott Francis (Mar 17)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: OpenSSL Stewart, William C (Bill), SALES (Mar 17)
  • Re: OpenSSL Michael . Dillon (Mar 18)
    • Re: OpenSSL Eric Rescorla (Mar 18)
      • Re: OpenSSL alex (Mar 18)
      • Re: OpenSSL Petri Helenius (Mar 18)
      • Re: OpenSSL alex (Mar 18)
      • Re: OpenSSL Eric Rescorla (Mar 18)
  • RE: OpenSSL Matt Ryan (Mar 18)
    • RE: OpenSSL alex (Mar 18)
    • Re: OpenSSL Petri Helenius (Mar 18)
  • RE: OpenSSL Matt Ryan (Mar 19)
• FW: Controlling outbound traffic in a multihomed BGP environment Daniel Abbey (Mar 17)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Controlling outbound traffic in a multihomed BGP environment Ejay Hire (Mar 17)
• Nortel SHASTA Gerard White (Mar 17)
  • Re: Nortel SHASTA Petri Helenius (Mar 17)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Nortel SHASTA Alan Sato (Mar 17)
• New MS and CERT Warning Eric Germann (Mar 17)
• of marginal oper. interest [bgp reflecting actual traffic flow (or not)] k claffy (Mar 17)
• Co-lo best practices on IP allocations Daniel Abbey (Mar 18)
  • Re: Co-lo best practices on IP allocations Andy Dills (Mar 18)
    • RE: Co-lo best practices on IP allocations marc van hoof (Mar 18)
      • Re: Co-lo best practices on IP allocations bdragon (Mar 20)
    • Re: Co-lo best practices on IP allocations Steve Gibbard (Mar 19)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Co-lo best practices on IP allocations Mohammed Al Sukkar (Mar 18)
  • RE: Co-lo best practices on IP allocations McBurnett, Jim (Mar 19)
• Code red- Returning? McBurnett, Jim (Mar 18)
  • RE: Code red- Returning? Eric Germann (Mar 18)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Code red- Returning? McBurnett, Jim (Mar 18)
  • FW: Code red- Returning? McBurnett, Jim (Mar 18)
  • RE: Code red- Returning? Mohammed Al Sukkar (Mar 18)
• whois.crsnic.net down? up (Mar 18)
  • Re: whois.crsnic.net down? william (Mar 18)
• --NON-Topic-- Advertising on NANOG instead of...... McBurnett, Jim (Mar 18)
• Problems with AT&T German Martinez (Mar 19)
  • Re: Problems with AT&T Charles E. Youse (Mar 19)
  • Re: Problems with AT&T Sean Donelan (Mar 19)
    • Re: Problems with AT&T brett watson (Mar 19)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Problems with AT&T Truman, Michelle, SALES (Mar 19)
    • Re: Problems with AT&T bdragon (Mar 20)
      • Re: Problems with AT&T Eric Osborne (Mar 20)
      • Re: Problems with AT&T bdragon (Mar 21)
  • RE: Problems with AT&T Brennan_Murphy (Mar 20)
  • RE: Problems with AT&T Truman, Michelle, SALES (Mar 20)
  • RE: Problems with AT&T Mohammed Al Sukkar (Mar 20)
  • RE: Problems with AT&T Truman, Michelle, SALES (Mar 20)
  • RE: Problems with AT&T Brennan_Murphy (Mar 21)
  • RE: Problems with AT&T Truman, Michelle, SALES (Mar 21)
  • RE: Problems with AT&T Mohammed Al Sukkar (Mar 22)
• 69/8 revisited Rick Ernst (Mar 19)
  • Re: 69/8 revisited jlewis (Mar 19)
    • Re: 69/8 revisited Scott Granados (Mar 19)
      • Re: 69/8 revisited jlewis (Mar 19)
      • Re: 69/8 revisited Stephen Sprunk (Mar 19)
      • Re: 69/8 revisited jlewis (Mar 19)
  • Re: 69/8 revisited Jared Mauch (Mar 19)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: 69/8 revisited McBurnett, Jim (Mar 19)
  • 69/8 revisited jlewis (Mar 28)
    • Re 7/8 - was Re: 69/8 revisited John Palmer (Mar 28)
      • Re: Re 7/8 - was Re: 69/8 revisited Haesu (Mar 28)
• Draft client notice for 69/8 problems Matt Martini (Mar 19)
• NJ: Red alert? Stay home, await word Jeff Wasilko (Mar 19)
  • Re: NJ: Red alert? Stay home, await word J.A. Terranson (Mar 19)
    • RE: NJ: Red alert? Stay home, await word Deepak Jain (Mar 19)
      • RE: NJ: Red alert? Stay home, await word ed (Mar 19)
      • Re: NJ: Red alert? Stay home, await word Joe (Mar 19)
      • Re: NJ: Red alert? Stay home, await word Jack Bates (Mar 19)
    • Re: NJ: Red alert? Stay home, await word ed (Mar 19)
    • Re: NJ: Red alert? Stay home, await word Vadim Antonov (Mar 19)
      • Re: NJ: Red alert? Stay home, await word ed (Mar 19)
      • Re: NJ: Red alert? Stay home, await word M. David Leonard (Mar 20)
• Re: Your message to "<nanog () merit edu>" Jack Bates (Mar 19)
• Initial network impacts post-US attack 3/19/03 Sean Donelan (Mar 19)
  • Re: Initial network impacts post-US attack 3/19/03 Stretch (Mar 19)
  • Re: Initial network impacts post-US attack 3/19/03 Richard A Steenbergen (Mar 19)
  • Re: Initial network impacts post-US attack 3/19/03 Sean Donelan (Mar 20)
    • RE: Initial network impacts post-US attack 3/19/03 Eric Germann (Mar 20)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Initial network impacts post-US attack 3/19/03 Tomas Daniska (Mar 20)
• Need Multicast Feed. Ejay Hire (Mar 20)
• VU#464113 - TCP/IP implementations handle unusual flag combinations inconsistently Ian Finlay (Mar 20)
• Trend and analysis tools David Scott Olverson (Mar 20)
• NY carrier neutral colo: what a maze... Steve Francis (Mar 20)
• Power outage: San Francisco Multimedia Gulch South of Market Sean Donelan (Mar 20)
• June NANOG meeting Susan Harris (Mar 20)
• ATM SVCs/Signalling Mark Borchers (Mar 21)
  • Re: ATM SVCs/Signalling John L Lee (Mar 21)
    • RE: ATM SVCs/Signalling Mark Borchers (Mar 21)
• OT: Notebooks /w a serial port? Drew Weaver (Mar 21)
  • Re: OT: Notebooks /w a serial port? Dave Israel (Mar 21)
    • Re: OT: Notebooks /w a serial port? Keptin Komrade Dr. BobWrench III esq. (Mar 21)
    • Re: OT: Notebooks /w a serial port? Johannes Ullrich (Mar 21)
  • Re: Notebooks /w a serial port? Adam Debus (Mar 21)
    • Re: Notebooks /w a serial port? David Lesher (Mar 21)
  • Re: OT: Notebooks /w a serial port? Andy Dills (Mar 21)
    • Re: OT: Notebooks /w a serial port? Charles Sprickman (Mar 21)
  • Re: OT: Notebooks /w a serial port? Dominic J. Eidson (Mar 21)
  • RE: Notebooks /w a serial port? Todd Mitchell - lists (Mar 21)
    • Re: Notebooks /w a serial port? Kevin Oberman (Mar 21)
      • Re: Notebooks /w a serial port? Steve Gibbard (Mar 21)
      • Re: Notebooks /w a serial port? Grant A. Kirkwood (Mar 21)
  • Re: OT: Notebooks /w a serial port? Larry Rosenman (Mar 21)
    • Re: OT: Notebooks /w a serial port? Jason Lixfeld (Mar 21)
    • Re: OT: Notebooks /w a serial port? Roy (Mar 21)
      • Re: OT: Notebooks /w a serial port? Larry Rosenman (Mar 21)
      • Re: OT: Notebooks /w a serial port? Charles Sprickman (Mar 21)
  • Re: Notebooks /w a serial port? Petri Helenius (Mar 21)
  • Re: OT: Notebooks /w a serial port? Michael Lucking (Mar 21)
  • Re: OT: Notebooks /w a serial port? joe mcguckin (Mar 21)
    • Re: OT: Notebooks /w a serial port? Andy Dills (Mar 21)
    • Re: OT: Notebooks /w a serial port? Joel Jaeggli (Mar 21)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: OT: Notebooks /w a serial port? Drew Weaver (Mar 21)
• (possible Flame bait) Backbone Building vs Transit purchasing Deepak Jain (Mar 21)
  • Re: (possible Flame bait) Backbone Building vs Transit purchasing Stephen J. Wilcox (Mar 21)
    • Re: (possible Flame bait) Backbone Building vs Transit purchasing alex (Mar 21)
      • Re: (possible Flame bait) Backbone Building vs Transit purchasing William B. Norton (Mar 21)
      • Re: (possible Flame bait) Backbone Building vs Transit purchasing alex (Mar 22)
  • Re: (possible Flame bait) Backbone Building vs Transit purchasing Leo Bicknell (Mar 21)
  • Re: (possible Flame bait) Backbone Building vs Transit purchasing Joe Provo (Mar 24)
    • Re: (possible Flame bait) Backbone Building vs Transit purchasing Bill Woodcock (Mar 24)
• OT: need SBCIS (7132) contact with DNS clue E.B. Dreger (Mar 21)
  • SBCIS DNS resolved (Re: OT: need SBCIS (7132) contact with DNS clue) E.B. Dreger (Mar 22)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: OT: need SBCIS (7132) contact with DNS clue Martin J. Levy (Mar 21)
    • Re: OT: need SBCIS (7132) contact with DNS clue E.B. Dreger (Mar 21)
    • Re: OT: need SBCIS (7132) contact with DNS clue just me (Mar 21)
• Iraqi Internet communications still working 3/21/03 Sean Donelan (Mar 21)
  • Re: Iraqi Internet communications still working 3/21/03 Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Mar 21)
    • Re: Iraqi Internet communications still working 3/21/03 Stephen J. Wilcox (Mar 21)
      • Re: Iraqi Internet communications still working 3/21/03 Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Mar 21)
    • Re: Iraqi Internet communications still working 3/21/03 Hank Nussbacher (Mar 22)
      • Re: Iraqi Internet communications still working 3/21/03 Peter E. Fry (Mar 22)
      • Re: Iraqi Internet communications still working 3/21/03 Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Mar 22)
  • Re: Iraqi Internet communications still working 3/21/03 Stephen J. Wilcox (Mar 21)
    • Re: Iraqi Internet communications still working 3/21/03 Sean Donelan (Mar 21)
    • Re: Iraqi Internet communications still working 3/21/03 Johannes Catterwell (Mar 21)
  • Re: Iraqi Internet communications still working 3/21/03 Neil J. McRae (Mar 22)
• VLAN between PAIX VA and EQUINIX ASHBURN Rodney Joffe (Mar 21)
• Bellsouth clueful? Jason Slagle (Mar 21)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Bellsouth clueful? McBurnett, Jim (Mar 22)
• different use of a backhoe Peter Galbavy (Mar 24)
  • Re: different use of a backhoe Christopher L. Morrow (Mar 24)
    • RE: different use of a backhoe Warren Kumari (Mar 24)
• Al Jazeera DOSed or just lots of traffic Sean Donelan (Mar 24)
  • Re: Al Jazeera DOSed or just lots of traffic Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri (Mar 24)
    • Re: Al Jazeera DOSed or just lots of traffic james (Mar 24)
      • Re: Al Jazeera DOSed or just lots of traffic Sean Donelan (Mar 24)
      • Re: Al Jazeera DOSed or just lots of traffic james (Mar 24)
      • Re: Al Jazeera DOSed or just lots of traffic Jeff Kell (Mar 24)
      • Re: Al Jazeera DOSed or just lots of traffic Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri (Mar 25)
• clued-in AOL postmaster? Will Yardley (Mar 24)
  • Re: clued-in AOL postmaster? Daniel Golding (Mar 25)
• Anyone using Finisar OC-n GBICS? Alex Rubenstein (Mar 25)
• Gifts for a CTO who has everything ... Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Mar 25)
• Using Policy Routing to stop DoS attacks Christian Liendo (Mar 25)
  • Re: Using Policy Routing to stop DoS attacks Haesu (Mar 25)
    • Re: Using Policy Routing to stop DoS attacks Christian Liendo (Mar 25)
    • Re: Using Policy Routing to stop DoS attacks Jack Bates (Mar 25)
  • Re: Using Policy Routing to stop DoS attacks Rafi Sadowsky (Mar 25)
  • Re: Using Policy Routing to stop DoS attacks John Kristoff (Mar 25)
    • Re: Using Policy Routing to stop DoS attacks Haesu (Mar 25)
      • Re: Using Policy Routing to stop DoS attacks fingers (Mar 25)
      • Re: Using Policy Routing to stop DoS attacks Christopher L. Morrow (Mar 25)
      • Re: Using Policy Routing to stop DoS attacks Haesu (Mar 25)
  • Re: Using Policy Routing to stop DoS attacks Christopher L. Morrow (Mar 25)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Using Policy Routing to stop DoS attacks Jim Deleskie (Mar 25)
    • RE: Using Policy Routing to stop DoS attacks Christopher L. Morrow (Mar 25)
  • Re: Using Policy Routing to stop DoS attacks Andre Chapuis (Mar 28)
    • Re: Using Policy Routing to stop DoS attacks Charles H. Gucker (Mar 28)
    • Re: Using Policy Routing to stop DoS attacks Christopher L. Morrow (Mar 28)
    • Re: Using Policy Routing to stop DoS attacks Petri Helenius (Mar 28)
• ASN allocation update Rob Thomas (Mar 25)
• Domain oddity - possibly early warning... Rodney Joffe (Mar 25)
  • Re: Domain oddity - possibly early warning... Matt Larson (Mar 26)
    • Re: Domain oddity - possibly early warning... Rodney Joffe (Mar 27)
• Syn Flood Christopher Bird (Mar 25)
  • Re: Syn Flood Johannes Ullrich (Mar 25)
  • RE: Syn Flood Ron Harris (Mar 25)
    • Lock Down (was Re: Syn Flood) Mike Lewinski (Mar 25)
  • Re: Syn Flood Jack Bates (Mar 25)
  • Re: Syn Flood Michael Painter (Mar 25)
• The weak link? DNS Sean Donelan (Mar 26)
  • how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) Paul Vixie (Mar 26)
    • Re: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) Dave Israel (Mar 26)
    • Re: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) william (Mar 26)
      • Re: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) william (Mar 26)
    • Re: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) Jeffrey C. Ollie (Mar 26)
      • Re: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) Bill Woodcock (Mar 26)
      • Re: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) Dave Israel (Mar 26)
    • Re: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) Niels Bakker (Mar 26)
      • Re: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) Paul Vixie (Mar 26)
      • Re: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) E.B. Dreger (Mar 26)
      • Re: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) Simon Lyall (Mar 26)
      • Re: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) E.B. Dreger (Mar 26)
    • Re: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) E.B. Dreger (Mar 26)
    • Re: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) Kurt Erik Lindqvist (Mar 27)
      • Re: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) Paul Vixie (Mar 27)
  • Re: The weak link? DNS Leo Bicknell (Mar 26)
  • Re: The weak link? DNS Matt Buford (Mar 26)
    • Re: The weak link? DNS Sean Donelan (Mar 26)
• suggestion for IBX in Washington DC K. Scott Bethke (Mar 26)
  • Re: suggestion for IBX in Washington DC madlion (Mar 26)
• opentrasit.net problem? Miguel Mata-Cardona (Mar 26)
• Re: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) Michael . Dillon (Mar 26)
  • Re: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) william (Mar 26)
    • Re: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 26)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) Kuhtz, Christian (Mar 26)
    • RE: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) E.B. Dreger (Mar 26)
      • RE: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) jlewis (Mar 26)
      • RE: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) E.B. Dreger (Mar 26)
      • Florida hostmaster (Mar 26)
      • RE: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) Charles Sprickman (Mar 26)
      • Re: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) Bruce Pinsky (Mar 26)
      • RE: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) Scott Weeks (Mar 26)
  • RE: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) Kuhtz, Christian (Mar 26)
  • how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS) Pedro R Marques (Mar 26)
• Re: [Re: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS)] Joshua Smith (Mar 26)
  • Re: [Re: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS)] Jeffrey C. Ollie (Mar 26)
• Odd DNS Traffic Support Team (Mar 26)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Odd DNS Traffic McBurnett, Jim (Mar 26)
• Contact with Clue at XO? Eric Whitehill (Mar 26)
  • Re: Contact with Clue at XO? Eric Whitehill (Mar 26)
• summary (Re: how to get people to upgrade?) Paul Vixie (Mar 26)
  • Re: summary (Re: how to get people to upgrade?) E.B. Dreger (Mar 26)
• Classified Len Rose (Mar 26)
• Both Iraqi state provider Uruklink.net name servers offline Sean Donelan (Mar 26)
  • Re: good networking Petri Helenius (Mar 27)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Both Iraqi state provider Uruklink.net name servers offline Brian McWilliams (Mar 27)
• Curing the BIND pain Michael . Dillon (Mar 27)
  • Re: Curing the BIND pain Nathan J. Mehl (Mar 27)
  • Re: Curing the BIND pain Andy Dills (Mar 27)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Curing the BIND pain Crist J. Clark (Mar 28)
• aljazeera.net domain owned. Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri (Mar 27)
  • Re: aljazeera.net domain owned. Subhi S Hashwa (Mar 27)
    • Re: aljazeera.net domain owned. Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Mar 27)
  • Re: aljazeera.net domain owned. Sean Donelan (Mar 27)
    • Re: aljazeera.net domain owned. Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Mar 27)
      • Re: aljazeera.net domain owned. John Palmer (Mar 27)
      • Re: aljazeera.net domain owned. Mike Tancsa (Mar 27)
• Verizon mail server on MAPS RSS list Josh Gentry (Mar 27)
  • Re: Verizon mail server on MAPS RSS list Richard Welty (Mar 27)
    • Re: Verizon mail server on MAPS RSS list Vinny Abello (Mar 27)
      • Message not available
      • Re[2]: Verizon mail server on MAPS RSS list Richard Welty (Mar 27)
  • Re: Verizon mail server on MAPS RSS list jlewis (Mar 27)
    • Re: Verizon mail server on MAPS RSS list Jack Bates (Mar 27)
  • Re: Verizon mail server on MAPS RSS list Christopher X. Candreva (Mar 28)
• burst.net DDoS? Danny (Mar 27)
  • RE: burst.net DDoS? Todd Mitchell - lists (Mar 27)
  • Re: burst.net DDoS? Allan Liska (Mar 27)
• Problems on internet today ? James-lists (Mar 27)
  • Re: Problems on internet today ? Sean Donelan (Mar 27)
    • Re: Problems on internet today ? James-lists (Mar 27)
      • Re: Problems on internet today ? Sean Donelan (Mar 27)
• Iraq Telecom Facility Jeffrey Meltzer (Mar 27)
  • Re: Iraq Telecom Facility Sean Donelan (Mar 27)
• Photographs of Iraqi telecomunication facilities Sean Donelan (Mar 28)
• is this true or... ? Tomas Daniska (Mar 28)
  • Re: is this true or... ? Steven M. Bellovin (Mar 28)
    • Re: is this true or... ? Steven M. Bellovin (Mar 28)
      • Re: is this true or... ? Jack Bates (Mar 28)
      • Re: is this true or... ? Steven M. Bellovin (Mar 28)
      • Re: is this true or... ? Scott W Brim (Mar 28)
      • Re: is this true or... ? Steven M. Bellovin (Mar 28)
      • Re: is this true or... ? Richard Irving (Mar 28)
      • Re: is this true or... ? batz (Mar 28)
  • Re: is this true or... ? blitz (Mar 28)
    • Re: is this true or... ? Sean Donelan (Mar 28)
      • Re: is this true or... ? Richard Irving (Mar 28)
      • Re: is this true or... ? Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 28)
      • Re: is this true or... ? Nathan E Norman (Mar 28)
      • Re: is this true or... ? Richard Irving (Mar 28)
      • Re: is this true or... ? Richard Irving (Mar 28)
      • Re: is this true or... ? Scott Weeks (Mar 28)
      • Re: is this true or... ? Scott Weeks (Mar 28)
      • Re: is this true or... ? David Lesher (Mar 30)
    • Re: is this true or... ? David Schwartz (Mar 28)
      • Re: is this true or... ? Steven M. Bellovin (Mar 28)
      • Re: is this true or... ? David Schwartz (Mar 28)
      • Re: is this true or... ? Lars Erik Gullerud (Mar 29)
      • State Super-DMCA Too True William Allen Simpson (Mar 29)
      • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True E.B. Dreger (Mar 29)
      • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Jack Bates (Mar 29)
      • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True E.B. Dreger (Mar 29)
      • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Tony Rall (Mar 29)
      • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Simon Lyall (Mar 30)
      • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Dan Hollis (Mar 30)
      • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Rubens Kuhl Jr. (Mar 30)
      • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Mike Lyon (Mar 30)
      • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Jack Bates (Mar 30)
      • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Robert A. Hayden (Mar 30)
      • RE: State Super-DMCA Too True todd glassey (Mar 31)
      • Message not available
      • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Jack Bates (Mar 30)
      • Message not available
      • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Jack Bates (Mar 30)
      • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Dan Hollis (Mar 30)
      • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Jack Bates (Mar 30)
      • Re[2]: State Super-DMCA Too True Richard Welty (Mar 30)
      • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Tony Rall (Mar 30)
      • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Peter Galbavy (Mar 31)
      • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Jack Bates (Mar 31)
      • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Richard A Steenbergen (Mar 31)
      • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Jack Bates (Mar 31)
      • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Dan Hollis (Mar 31)
      • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Jack Bates (Mar 31)
      • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Stephen Sprunk (Mar 31)
      • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Petri Helenius (Mar 31)
      • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Rubens Kuhl Jr. (Mar 31)
      • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Petri Helenius (Mar 31)
      • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Stephen Sprunk (Mar 31)
      • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Matthew S. Hallacy (Mar 31)
      • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True David Lesher (Mar 30)
      • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Alex Lambert (Mar 30)
      • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Niels Bakker (Mar 30)
      • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Larry J. Blunk (Mar 30)
      • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Avleen Vig (Mar 30)
      • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Larry J. Blunk (Mar 30)
      • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Jack Bates (Mar 30)
      • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Larry J. Blunk (Mar 30)
      • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Avleen Vig (Mar 30)
      • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Dan Hollis (Mar 30)
      • Remembers, Non-Op Topics Have a Home (was Re: State Super-DMCA Too True) Nathan J. Mehl (Mar 31)
      • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Dave Howe (Mar 30)
      • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Dan Hollis (Mar 30)
      • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Jack Bates (Mar 30)
      • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Dan Hollis (Mar 30)
      • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Bruce Pinsky (Mar 30)
      • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Leo Bicknell (Mar 30)
      • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True David Lesher (Mar 30)
      • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True William Allen Simpson (Mar 30)
      • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Dan Hollis (Mar 30)
      • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Bruce Pinsky (Mar 30)
      • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Michael Airhart (Mar 30)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: is this true or... ? Alfredo Sola (Mar 28)
  • RE: is this true or... ? Ejay Hire (Mar 28)
    • Re: is this true or... ? Richard Irving (Mar 28)
• DNS dDos Attack! Dan Armstrong (Mar 28)
  • Re: DNS dDos Attack! Stephen J. Wilcox (Mar 28)
  • Message not available
    • Re: DNS dDos Attack! Dan Armstrong (Mar 28)
      • Re: DNS dDos Attack! Jared Mauch (Mar 28)
      • Re: DNS dDos Attack! Kevin Houle (Mar 28)
• Fw: Freedom to Tinker: Use a Firewall, Go to Jail Peter Galbavy (Mar 28)
  • Re: Freedom to Tinker: Use a Firewall, Go to Jail Peter Galbavy (Mar 28)
• OT: FW: About your using mailer Mike Damm (Mar 28)
• RE: FW: About your using mailer Kris Foster (Mar 28)
  • Re: FW: About your using mailer Jeff Kell (Mar 28)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: FW: About your using mailer Kris Foster (Mar 28)
• Re: [OT: FW: About your using mailer] Joshua Smith (Mar 28)
  • Re: [OT: FW: About your using mailer] Dave Israel (Mar 28)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [OT: FW: About your using mailer] Mike Damm (Mar 28)
    • RE: [OT: FW: About your using mailer] just me (Mar 28)
• Allegiance telecom boston colo down? Eric Gauthier (Mar 28)
  • Re: Allegiance telecom boston colo down? Dave Israel (Mar 28)
    • Re: Allegiance telecom boston colo down? Sean Donelan (Mar 28)
      • Re: Allegiance telecom boston colo down? Dave Israel (Mar 28)
      • Re: Allegiance telecom boston colo down? Sean Donelan (Mar 28)
      • Re: Allegiance telecom boston colo down? Eric Gauthier (Mar 28)
      • Re: Allegiance telecom boston colo down? Dave Israel (Mar 28)
      • Re: Allegiance telecom boston colo down? Sean Donelan (Mar 28)
      • Re: Allegiance telecom boston colo down? Dave Israel (Mar 28)
      • Re: Allegiance telecom boston colo down? Andy Dills (Mar 28)
      • Re: Allegiance telecom boston colo down? Dan Hollis (Mar 28)
• The backhoes are coming out of hibernation (Boston/New York) Sean Donelan (Mar 28)
• OUTAGE: Known Iraq public Internet service Sean Donelan (Mar 28)
  • Re: OUTAGE: Known Iraq public Internet service Sean Donelan (Mar 30)
• More Gifts for a CTO who has everything ... Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Mar 29)
• more sendmail fun. Len Rose (Mar 29)
• sendmail 8.12.9 available (fwd) bmanning (Mar 29)
  • Re: sendmail 8.12.9 available (fwd) Jack Bates (Mar 29)
• Typo's in DNS, Al Jazeera back online Sean Donelan (Mar 29)
• Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Kevin Loch (Mar 29)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: State Super-DMCA Too True McBurnett, Jim (Mar 30)
    • RE: State Super-DMCA Too True E.B. Dreger (Mar 30)
  • RE: State Super-DMCA Too True McBurnett, Jim (Mar 30)
    • RE: State Super-DMCA Too True E.B. Dreger (Mar 30)
  • RE: State Super-DMCA Too True McBurnett, Jim (Mar 30)
  • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Kevin Loch (Mar 30)
  • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Neil J. McRae (Mar 31)
  • RE: State Super-DMCA Too True todd glassey (Mar 31)
    • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Stephen Sprunk (Mar 31)
      • RE: State Super-DMCA Too True todd glassey (Mar 31)
      • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Stephen Sprunk (Mar 31)
      • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Richard A Steenbergen (Mar 31)
      • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Alex Lambert (Mar 31)
  • RE: State Super-DMCA Too True Kuhtz, Christian (Mar 31)
    • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Stephen Sprunk (Mar 31)
      • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Jack Bates (Mar 31)
      • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Dan Hollis (Mar 31)
      • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Jack Bates (Mar 31)
      • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Stephen Sprunk (Mar 31)
      • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Dan Hollis (Mar 31)
      • RE: State Super-DMCA Too True todd glassey (Mar 31)
      • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Stephen Sprunk (Mar 31)
  • RE: State Super-DMCA Too True Kuhtz, Christian (Mar 31)
    • Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Stephen Sprunk (Mar 31)
  • RE: State Super-DMCA Too True Kris Foster (Mar 31)
• NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True) Jack Bates (Mar 30)
  • RE: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True) todd glassey (Mar 30)
    • Re: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True) Jared Mauch (Mar 30)
      • Re: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True) Rafi Sadowsky (Mar 30)
      • Re: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True) Jack Bates (Mar 30)
      • Re: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True) Nathan J. Mehl (Mar 31)
      • RE: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True) todd glassey (Mar 30)
      • RE: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True) Krzysztof Adamski (Mar 30)
      • RE: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True) todd glassey (Mar 31)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True) McBurnett, Jim (Mar 30)
  • RE: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True) Kris Foster (Mar 31)
    • RE: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True) todd glassey (Mar 31)
  • RE: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True) todd glassey (Mar 31)
• RE: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True) (why not nanog-legal ?) McBurnett, Jim (Mar 30)
  • Re: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True) (why not nanog-legal ?) Mark Rogaski (Mar 30)
• Wierd... McBurnett, Jim (Mar 30)
• Internic whois Hank Nussbacher (Mar 30)
• Current DF providers list? Deepak Jain (Mar 31)
• Where fiber goes, backhoes soon follow: Camp Doha fiber link Sean Donelan (Mar 31)
  • Re: Where fiber goes, backhoes soon follow: Camp Doha fiber link Bill Woodcock (Mar 31)
  • Re: Where fiber goes, backhoes soon follow: Camp Doha fiber link Mark Barker (Mar 31)
• CFP: The Workshop on Rapid Malcode (WORM) vern (Mar 31)
• Invitation to join Friendster from Jeff Wheeler Jeff Wheeler (Mar 31)
• Re: [RE: State Super-DMCA Too True] Joshua Smith (Mar 31)
  • RE: [RE: State Super-DMCA Too True] todd glassey (Mar 31)
• internet.com Michael Painter (Mar 31)
  • Message not available
    • Re: internet.com Michael Painter (Mar 31)
  • Re: internet.com E.B. Dreger (Mar 31)
    • Re: internet.com Patrick (Mar 31)
    • Re: internet.com Michael Painter (Mar 31)
      • Re: internet.com Rafi Sadowsky (Mar 31)
      • Re: internet.com Rodney Joffe (Mar 31)
• [no subject] Unknown (Feb 04)
• [no subject] Unknown (Feb 04)
• [no subject] Unknown (Feb 04)
• [no subject] Unknown (Feb 04)
• [no subject] Unknown (Feb 04)
• [no subject] Unknown (Feb 04)

Previous period

Next period