nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP to doom us all
From: David Conrad <david.conrad () nominum com>
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 08:29:42 -0800
On Monday, March 3, 2003, at 06:52 AM, Kuhtz, Christian wrote:
Why not?
Well, it depends on what you want to use LDAP for.For example, take a naive approach: your router crashes. It comes back up. It receives 130,000 prefixes that it needs to validate. For each prefix, your router must do an LDAP query.
Can you be more specific as to why you think that LDAP is not suitable?
Relatively heavyweight connections and no caching. Rgds, -drc
Current thread:
- Re: BGP to doom us all, (continued)
- Re: BGP to doom us all Avi Freedman (Mar 02)
- Re: BGP to doom us all Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 02)
- Re: BGP to doom us all Jack Bates (Mar 03)
- Re: BGP to doom us all E.B. Dreger (Mar 03)
- Re: BGP to doom us all Michael . Dillon (Mar 03)
- Re: BGP to doom us all Stephane Bortzmeyer (Mar 03)
- Re: BGP to doom us all bmanning (Mar 03)
- RE: BGP to doom us all St. Clair, James (Mar 03)
- RE: BGP to doom us all Kuhtz, Christian (Mar 03)
- Re: BGP to doom us all bmanning (Mar 03)
- Re: BGP to doom us all David Conrad (Mar 03)
- Re: BGP to doom us all Michael . Dillon (Mar 03)
- Re: BGP to doom us all Michael . Dillon (Mar 03)
- Re: BGP to doom us all Avi Freedman (Mar 02)
- Re: Tools Andrew Newton (Mar 03)