Re: cw to att? issue?

["Thomas Kernen" <tkernen () deckpoint ch>]

I don't agree, I update the links at least once a month and more frequently
if I get feedback from the community.

Thomas

----- Original Message -----
From: "Haesu" <haesu () towardex com>
To: "Scott Granados" <scott () wworks net>
Cc: "Richard A Steenbergen" <ras () e-gerbil net>; <nanog () nanog org>
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 2:51 AM
Subject: Re: cw to att? issue?


> www.traceroute.org should have some but that site hasn't been updated in
> ages..
>
> These are *some* that I know including oregon:
>
> route-views.oregon-ix.net
> route-views2.oregon-ix.net
> route-server.gt.ca
> route-server.ip.att.net
> route-server.cw.net
> route-server.bbnplanet.net
>
> hope it helps..
>
> -hc
>
> On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Scott Granados wrote:
>
> > Is there a good plac for a listing of the publically available
> > route-servers?  I only knew of the oregon one.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Richard A Steenbergen" <ras () e-gerbil net>
> > To: "Scott Granados" <scott () wworks net>
> > Cc: <nanog () nanog org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 5:35 PM
> > Subject: Re: cw to att? issue?
> >
> >
> > > On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 02:19:58PM -0800, Scott Granados wrote:
> > > > It actually looked like it was farther in the att network, after
cw's
> > peer
> > > > the next hop after cw's peer.
> > > >
> > > > I just tried the trace again and it seems better.
> > > >
> > > > Cw seems to be handing off to att at a  different point in
santaclara
> > now
> > > > not sanfrancisco which seemed to help.
> > > > Again though it looked like att was the issue because cw looked fine
up
> > > > tntil one hop after cw ended.
> > >
> > > route-server.ip.att.net
> > >
> > > When in doubt, try looking at the reverse path.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Richard A Steenbergen <ras () e-gerbil net>
http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
> > > GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1
2CBC)
> > >