nanog mailing list archives
Re: spamcop.net?
From: "Christopher L. Morrow" <chris () UU NET>
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 05:01:00 +0000 (GMT)
On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Martin Hannigan wrote:
Not for nothing, but there's so much time wasted with all these diversified spam systems. I've been reading about Barry Shein's proposals and I have to say I am on board with a centralized -single- system based on his young, but intelligent, model.
One large problem is that people utilize these various lists without the understanding as to what they really will block. Blocking standard 'your penis can be bigger' messages is one thing, blocking production email to customers is another :(
http://www.internetweek.com/breakingNews/INW20021219S0003 I applaud RBL, spamcop, etc., but without funding and consolidation, it's another waste of offensive time that could be spent on a far more effective defense. -M At 02:51 AM 3/4/2003 +0000, Christopher L. Morrow wrote:On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, blitz wrote:Anyone having trouble getting to/ know of any issues with spamcop.nettoday?They seemed to have dropped off the radar from me... No pings No traceroute but they still show registered at 216.127.43.89laptop ~]$ t 216.127.43.89 80 Trying 216.127.43.89... Connected to 216.127.43.89 (216.127.43.89). Escape character is '^]'. GET / hmm, there isnt anything returning right now, but it connects atleast :)Tnx Marc macronet.netRegards, -- Martin Hannigan hannigan () fugawi net
Current thread:
- spamcop.net? blitz (Mar 03)
- Re: spamcop.net? Will Yardley (Mar 03)
- Re: spamcop.net? Christopher L. Morrow (Mar 03)
- Message not available
- Re: spamcop.net? Martin Hannigan (Mar 03)
- Re: spamcop.net? Christopher L. Morrow (Mar 03)
- Re: spamcop.net? Stephen Sprunk (Mar 04)
- Re: spamcop.net? blitz (Mar 04)
- Re: spamcop.net? chuck goolsbee (Mar 04)
- Re: spamcop.net? Paul Vixie (Mar 04)
- Re: spamcop.net? Martin Hannigan (Mar 03)
- Message not available
- RE: spamcop.net? blitz (Mar 04)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: spamcop.net? Peter Salus (Mar 04)