nanog mailing list archives
Re: Port 445 issues (was: Port 80 Issues)
From: Jonathan Claybaugh <jonathan () prioritynetworks net>
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2003 17:11:52 -0500
Are other people having problems with this right now? There doesn't seem to be very much traffic or information about this on any of the security lists (it is Sunday...). The last posted URL points to an impending storm... Other operators opinions about blocking port 445 before this thing starts spreading faster than it already is? On Sunday 09 March 2003 03:03 pm, james wrote:
Here is a graph of scans for port 445: http://isc.incidents.org/port_details.html?port=445
Current thread:
- Port 80 Issues John Murphy (Mar 08)
- Re: Port 80 Issues Richard A Steenbergen (Mar 08)
- Port 445 issues (was: Port 80 Issues) Johannes Ullrich (Mar 09)
- Re: Port 445 issues (was: Port 80 Issues) james (Mar 09)
- Re: Port 445 issues (was: Port 80 Issues) Jonathan Claybaugh (Mar 09)
- Re: Port 445 issues (was: Port 80 Issues) Johannes Ullrich (Mar 09)
- Re: Port 445 issues (was: Port 80 Issues) james (Mar 09)
- Re: Port 445 issues (was: Port 80 Issues) Sean Donelan (Mar 09)
- Re: Port 445 issues (was: Port 80 Issues) Jack Bates (Mar 09)
- Re: Port 445 issues (was: Port 80 Issues) james (Mar 09)
- Re: Port 445 issues (was: Port 80 Issues) Vadim Antonov (Mar 10)
- Re: Port 445 issues (was: Port 80 Issues) james (Mar 09)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Port 80 Issues John Murphy (Mar 08)
- Re: Port 80 Issues John Murphy (Mar 08)
- Re: Port 80 Issues Sean Donelan (Mar 08)
- Re: Port 80 Issues John Murphy (Mar 08)