nanog mailing list archives
Re: route filtering in large networks
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 23:51:23 -0500
If you are not ready willing and able to keep your lists updated, you probably shouldn't have applied them in the first place.
a poor but wise person who had the onerous task of managing me in the late '60s said i had a talent for stating the obvious. it was meant as a compliment. randy
Current thread:
- Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks), (continued)
- Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) JC Dill (Mar 12)
- gender and nanog Randy Bush (Mar 12)
- route filtering in large networks Andy Dills (Mar 12)
- Re: route filtering in large networks Richard A Steenbergen (Mar 12)
- Re: route filtering in large networks Jack Bates (Mar 12)
- RE: route filtering in large networks Michael K. Smith (Mar 12)
- Re: route filtering in large networks Jack Bates (Mar 12)
- Re: route filtering in large networks Peter E. Fry (Mar 12)
- Re: route filtering in large networks Christopher L. Morrow (Mar 12)
- Re: route filtering in large networks Rob Thomas (Mar 12)
- Re: route filtering in large networks Randy Bush (Mar 12)
- Re: route filtering in large networks E.B. Dreger (Mar 13)
- Re: route filtering in large networks Lars Erik Gullerud (Mar 13)
- Re: route filtering in large networks Alan Hannan (Mar 12)
- Re: route filtering in large networks Randy Bush (Mar 12)
- Re: route filtering in large networks Andy Dills (Mar 12)
- Re: route filtering in large networks Randy Bush (Mar 13)
- Re: route filtering in large networks Dorian Kim (Mar 13)
- Re: route filtering in large networks Stephen Sprunk (Mar 13)
- Re: route filtering in large networks Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 13)
- IETF BOF on Network Configuration (netconf) Sean Donelan (Mar 13)