nanog mailing list archives
Re: Route Supression Problem
From: John Kristoff <jtk () aharp is-net depaul edu>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 08:05:17 -0600
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 06:53:03AM -0600, Jack Bates wrote:
traffic going to them. My router shows the last BGP peer reset about that
[...]
I've not seen reference to it, since the customer only transits through my network and depends on my redundancy, is it possible to hold his routes in the tables and keep advertising them out unless they are down for a set time period (ie, ignore flaps, but drop them if he's down 15-30 minutes)?
While perhaps not always an ideal solution, is it possible for the customer to set default to you rather than having to use BGP? You could in turn use static routing back to them for their netblock(s). John
Current thread:
- Route Supression Problem Jack Bates (Mar 12)
- Re: Route Supression Problem Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 12)
- Re: Route Supression Problem Randy Bush (Mar 12)
- Re: Route Supression Problem Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 12)
- Re: Route Supression Problem Peter E. Fry (Mar 12)
- Re: Route Supression Problem Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 12)
- Re: Route Supression Problem Randy Bush (Mar 12)
- Re: Route Supression Problem Vadim Antonov (Mar 12)
- Re: Route Supression Problem Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 12)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Route Supression Problem Michael . Dillon (Mar 12)
- Re: Route Supression Problem Adam Rothschild (Mar 12)
- Re: Route Supression Problem Danny McPherson (Mar 12)
- Re: Route Supression Problem Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 12)
- Re: Route Supression Problem Jack Bates (Mar 12)
- Re: Route Supression Problem Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 12)
- Re: Route Supression Problem Danny McPherson (Mar 12)
- Re: Route Supression Problem Danny McPherson (Mar 12)