nanog mailing list archives
Re: Bogon and anti-spoof filters
From: "Simon Brilus" <sbrilus () cableinet net>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 11:00:50 -0000
CPU typically 22% Free memory 97Mb And I would assume access-lists TTFN Simon ----- Original Message ----- From: "Neil J. McRae" <neil () DOMINO ORG> To: "Simon Brilus" <sbrilus () cableinet net> Cc: <nanog () merit edu> Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 9:57 AM Subject: Re: Bogon and anti-spoof filters
Does anyone have any idea of the processing overhead that would be
placed on
a Cisco 7507 if you applied bogon and anti-spoof filters on a 100BT interface that faced the Internet, assuming VIP4-80 engines and 256Mb of memory?I assume you mean interface filters? If so I'd have thought that a 7507 would cope with this, but it depends on the rest of the boxs load etc. Regards, Neil.
Current thread:
- Re: 69/8...this sucks, (continued)
- Re: 69/8...this sucks E.B. Dreger (Mar 10)
- Re: 69/8...this sucks Jared Mauch (Mar 10)
- Re: 69/8...this sucks Charles Sprickman (Mar 10)
- Re: 69/8...this sucks Doug Barton (Mar 10)
- Re: 69/8...this sucks E.B. Dreger (Mar 10)
- Re: 69/8...this sucks Doug Barton (Mar 10)
- Re: 69/8...this sucks E.B. Dreger (Mar 10)
- Re: 69/8...this sucks Stephen J. Wilcox (Mar 11)
- Bogon and anti-spoof filters Simon Brilus (Mar 11)
- Re: Bogon and anti-spoof filters Neil J. McRae (Mar 11)
- Re: Bogon and anti-spoof filters Simon Brilus (Mar 11)
- Re: Bogon and anti-spoof filters Jack Bates (Mar 11)
- Re: 69/8...this sucks E.B. Dreger (Mar 10)
- Re: 69/8...this sucks Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 10)
- RE: 69/8...this sucks E.B. Dreger (Mar 10)
- RE: 69/8...this sucks Rob Thomas (Mar 10)
- scope of the 69/8 problem E.B. Dreger (Mar 10)