nanog mailing list archives
Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ...
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike () swm pp se>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 22:09:51 +0100 (CET)
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
Production commercial networks need not apply, 'lest someone realize that they blow away these speed records on a regular basis.
What kind of production environment needs a single TCP stream of data at 1 gigabit/s over a 150ms latency link? Just the fact that you need a ~20 megabyte TCP window size to achieve this (feel free to correct me if I'm wrong here) seems kind of unusal to me. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike () swm pp se
Current thread:
- 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Eric Germann (Mar 07)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Dave Israel (Mar 07)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Stephen J. Wilcox (Mar 07)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Robert E. Seastrom (Mar 07)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Richard A Steenbergen (Mar 07)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Mikael Abrahamsson (Mar 07)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Richard A Steenbergen (Mar 07)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... David G. Andersen (Mar 07)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Marshall Eubanks (Mar 07)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Marshall Eubanks (Mar 07)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... fingers (Mar 07)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Matt Zimmerman (Mar 07)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Stephen J. Wilcox (Mar 07)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Richard A Steenbergen (Mar 07)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... E.B. Dreger (Mar 07)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Jason Slagle (Mar 08)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Stephen J. Wilcox (Mar 07)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Dave Israel (Mar 07)