nanog mailing list archives
Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ...
From: Sean M.Doran <smd () cesium clock org>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 22:13:15 +0000
On Friday, Mar 7, 2003, at 20:53 Europe/London, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
Production commercial networks need not apply, 'lest someone realize that they blow away these speed records on a regular basis.
Fortunately, these days there are very few production networks press-releasing the size of their ISPnesses. Sean. (mine's bigger than yours, anyway)
Current thread:
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ..., (continued)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Marshall Eubanks (Mar 07)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Marshall Eubanks (Mar 07)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... fingers (Mar 07)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Matt Zimmerman (Mar 07)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Stephen J. Wilcox (Mar 07)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Richard A Steenbergen (Mar 07)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... E.B. Dreger (Mar 07)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Jason Slagle (Mar 08)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... alex (Mar 08)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Hank Nussbacher (Mar 08)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Sean M . Doran (Mar 07)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Hank Nussbacher (Mar 08)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Stephen Sprunk (Mar 08)
- Message not available
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Dave Israel (Mar 07)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Peter Galbavy (Mar 08)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Andy Dills (Mar 07)