nanog mailing list archives

Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ...


From: Marshall Eubanks <tme () multicasttech com>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 16:49:54 -0500


Hello;

There was a 1.5 Gigabit per second uncompressed HDTV stream that was sent
U Washington to DC.

http://www.washington.edu/hdtv/next-gen.html

True, that was sent RTP over  UDP, but if I was
going to send that data rate over a _dedicated_ link, I would use UDP. The very high bit rate applications I have been involved with could all tolerate
some loss, and for the others, a little FEC could go a long way.

On Friday, March 7, 2003, at 04:09  PM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:


On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:

Production commercial networks need not apply, 'lest someone realize that
they blow away these speed records on a regular basis.

What kind of production environment needs a single TCP stream of data
at 1 gigabit/s over a 150ms latency link?

Just the fact that you need a ~20 megabyte TCP window size to achieve this
(feel free to correct me if I'm wrong here) seems kind of unusal to me.

--
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike () swm pp se


                                 Regards
                                 Marshall Eubanks

T.M. Eubanks
Multicast Technologies, Inc.
Phone : 703-293-9601       Fax     : 703-293-9609
e-mail : tme () multicasttech com
http://www.multicasttech.com

 Our New Multicast Workshop :
 http://www.multicasttech.com/workshop


Current thread: