nanog mailing list archives
Re: 69/8...this sucks
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 16:15:36 -0500
On Mon, 10 Mar 2003 16:00:01 EST, "McBurnett, Jim" said:
This will leave the clueless to buy a clue and stimulate the economy ;-)Hey if it will be a great Stimulas package I bet we could get congressional research funding to try it..... ;)
Note the obvious bootstrapping problem with most Congresscritters.... :)
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: 69/8...this sucks, (continued)
- Re: 69/8...this sucks E.B. Dreger (Mar 10)
- Re: 69/8...this sucks Stephen J. Wilcox (Mar 11)
- Bogon and anti-spoof filters Simon Brilus (Mar 11)
- Re: Bogon and anti-spoof filters Neil J. McRae (Mar 11)
- Re: Bogon and anti-spoof filters Simon Brilus (Mar 11)
- Re: Bogon and anti-spoof filters Jack Bates (Mar 11)
- Re: 69/8...this sucks E.B. Dreger (Mar 10)
- Re: 69/8...this sucks Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 10)
- RE: 69/8...this sucks E.B. Dreger (Mar 10)
- RE: 69/8...this sucks Rob Thomas (Mar 10)
- scope of the 69/8 problem E.B. Dreger (Mar 10)
- Re: scope of the 69/8 problem Stephen Sprunk (Mar 11)
- Re: scope of the 69/8 problem jlewis (Mar 11)
- Re: scope of the 69/8 problem bdragon (Mar 19)
- Re: 69/8...this sucks Joel Jaeggli (Mar 10)
- Re: 69/8...this sucks Owen DeLong (Mar 10)