Re: State Super-DMCA Too True

["Petri Helenius" <pete () he iki fi>]

> Probably because of blocking at the origin point, such as corporate net-mgrs
> trying to prevent bandwidth hogs or liability issues.
Sure but my point is, that unless you run your private p2p network somewhere
which is not connected to the internet, you´ll end up with similar figures because
these "net-mgrs" will be out there doing their thing and there is nothing you can do
about them doing it.

Pete


> Rubens
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Petri Helenius" <pete () he iki fi>
> To: "Stephen Sprunk" <stephen () sprunk org>; "Jack Bates"
> <jbates () brightok net>
> Cc: "Richard A Steenbergen" <ras () e-gerbil net>; "Peter Galbavy"
> <peter.galbavy () knowtion net>; "Mike Lyon" <mlyon () fitzharris com>; "Simon
> Lyall" <simon.lyall () ihug co nz>; "Tony Rall" <trall () almaden ibm com>; "North
> American Noise and Off-topic Gripes" <nanog () merit edu>
> Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 6:08 PM
> Subject: Re: State Super-DMCA Too True
>
>
> |
> | > Well, most p2p apps live on well-known ports, and Cisco's QOS mechanism
> | > allows easy classification on ports.  Yes, most of the p2p apps are
> | > port-agile -- but only if they are completely blocked.  My experience is
> | > that if you let the p2p stuff through, it'll stick to its default port
> and
> | > you can police with impunity.
> |
> | Our data shows that between 30% and 50% of p2p data flows on
> "non-standard"
> | ports if you run an unblocked environment.
> |
> | Pete
> |