nanog mailing list archives

Re: how to get people to upgrade? (Re: The weak link? DNS)


From: "E.B. Dreger" <eddy+public+spam () noc everquick net>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 22:07:49 +0000 (GMT)


SL> Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 09:55:08 +1200 (NZST)
SL> From: Simon Lyall


SL> I'm also worried about any concept of trying to "force"
SL> people to upgrade, even with bind I use some features (namely
SL> an external named-xfer program) of bind v8 that arn't
SL> available in bind v9 . For the servers which I need this on I

I'm curious... why not use "dig @wherever zone.example axfr"
instead?


SL> run bind 8.3.3 (Vendor backported with the 8.3.4 fixes) of
SL> copy the named-xfer program over to the bind 9 box.

Agreed re the hazards of being heavy-handed.  However, I'm sure
there would be those who disabled the automated checkup... the
question is, would they be the crowd for whom the approach in
question was intended?


Eddy
--
Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - EverQuick Internet Division
Bandwidth, consulting, e-commerce, hosting, and network building
Phone: +1 (785) 865-5885 Lawrence and [inter]national
Phone: +1 (316) 794-8922 Wichita

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:23:58 +0000 (GMT)
From: A Trap <blacklist () brics com>
To: blacklist () brics com
Subject: Please ignore this portion of my mail signature.

These last few lines are a trap for address-harvesting spambots.
Do NOT send mail to <blacklist () brics com>, or you are likely to
be blocked.


Current thread: