nanog mailing list archives
Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ...
From: Adam Kujawski <adamkuj () amplex net>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 16:09:25 -0500
Quoting Eric Germann <ekgermann () cctec com>:
http://www.cnn.com/2003/TECH/internet/03/07/speed.record/index.html Comments folks?
I'm going to launch a couple DAT tapes across the parking lot with a spud gun and see if I can achieve 923 Mb/s! It would have been nice if the reporter bothered to mention that "Internet speed records" are measured in terabit meters per second. An article about "Internet speed records" that doesn't include the actual record, or even a definition of the term "Internet speed record", is hardly deserving of placement on the front of cnn.com. Slow news day? -Adam
Current thread:
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ..., (continued)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Sean M . Doran (Mar 07)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Hank Nussbacher (Mar 08)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Stephen Sprunk (Mar 08)
- Message not available
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Dave Israel (Mar 07)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Peter Galbavy (Mar 08)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Andy Dills (Mar 07)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Scott Weeks (Mar 07)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Miles Fidelman (Mar 07)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Andrew Dorsett (Mar 07)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... E.B. Dreger (Mar 07)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Hank Nussbacher (Mar 08)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Jessica Yu (Mar 08)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Marshall Eubanks (Mar 08)