nanog mailing list archives
Re: Question concerning authoritative bodies.
From: "J.A. Terranson" <measl () mfn org>
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2003 17:06:11 -0600 (CST)
On Sun, 9 Mar 2003, E.B. Dreger wrote:
True. It cracks me up when someone complains about being on Selwerd XBL.
You may find it funny, but I do not. I get literally dozens, possibly hundreds of calls a year about that moron. He costs us real money in lost cycles. His inclusion in the various "master lists" also hurts the validity of those lists (which I've often wondered over. Is it possible that Selwerd is actually trying to point out the lunacy of [many] lists? -- Yours, J.A. Terranson sysadmin () mfn org
Current thread:
- Question concerning authoritative bodies. Jack Bates (Mar 09)
- Re: Question concerning authoritative bodies. Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 09)
- Re: Question concerning authoritative bodies. Jack Bates (Mar 09)
- Re: Question concerning authoritative bodies. Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 09)
- Re: Question concerning authoritative bodies. Jack Bates (Mar 09)
- Re: Question concerning authoritative bodies. jlewis (Mar 09)
- Re: Question concerning authoritative bodies. Jack Bates (Mar 09)
- Re: Question concerning authoritative bodies. Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 09)
- Re: Question concerning authoritative bodies. E.B. Dreger (Mar 09)
- Re: Question concerning authoritative bodies. J.A. Terranson (Mar 09)
- Re: Question concerning authoritative bodies. jlewis (Mar 09)
- Re: Question concerning authoritative bodies. up (Mar 09)
- Re: Question concerning authoritative bodies. jlewis (Mar 11)
- Re: Question concerning authoritative bodies. Andy Walden (Mar 11)
- Re: Question concerning authoritative bodies. Ron da Silva (Mar 12)
- Re: Question concerning authoritative bodies. jlewis (Mar 12)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Question concerning authoritative bodies. McBurnett, Jim (Mar 09)