nanog mailing list archives
Re: Bogon and anti-spoof filters
From: "Jack Bates" <jbates () brightok net>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 08:28:28 -0600
From: "Simon Brilus"
Does anyone have any idea of the processing overhead that would be placed
on
a Cisco 7507 if you applied bogon and anti-spoof filters on a 100BT interface that faced the Internet, assuming VIP4-80 engines and 256Mb of memory?
It's not too bad. If it will support everything else you are doing, as it isn't as versatile, the VIP8 (or was it 6; no coffee yet) is primarily designed to handle complex access lists, or so an SE once told me. It didn't handle the other functionality I needed, so i stayed with the 4. -Jack
Current thread:
- Re: 69/8...this sucks, (continued)
- Re: 69/8...this sucks Jared Mauch (Mar 10)
- Re: 69/8...this sucks Charles Sprickman (Mar 10)
- Re: 69/8...this sucks Doug Barton (Mar 10)
- Re: 69/8...this sucks E.B. Dreger (Mar 10)
- Re: 69/8...this sucks Doug Barton (Mar 10)
- Re: 69/8...this sucks E.B. Dreger (Mar 10)
- Re: 69/8...this sucks Stephen J. Wilcox (Mar 11)
- Bogon and anti-spoof filters Simon Brilus (Mar 11)
- Re: Bogon and anti-spoof filters Neil J. McRae (Mar 11)
- Re: Bogon and anti-spoof filters Simon Brilus (Mar 11)
- Re: Bogon and anti-spoof filters Jack Bates (Mar 11)
- Re: 69/8...this sucks E.B. Dreger (Mar 10)
- Re: 69/8...this sucks Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 10)
- RE: 69/8...this sucks E.B. Dreger (Mar 10)
- RE: 69/8...this sucks Rob Thomas (Mar 10)
- scope of the 69/8 problem E.B. Dreger (Mar 10)
- Re: scope of the 69/8 problem Stephen Sprunk (Mar 11)