nanog mailing list archives
Re: 69/8 revisited
From: jlewis () lewis org
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 17:01:45 -0500 (EST)
On Wed, 19 Mar 2003, Stephen Sprunk wrote:
I'm wondering if there's something special about 69/8... I can't recall this sort of discussion for 61/8 through 68/8, at least after CIDR in the former Class A space was initially validated.
For a very interesting comparison, do groups.google.com searches for 69.0.0.0/8 and then for 61.0.0.0/8. While the first is several pages of hits saying to block 69.0.0.0/8 as a bogon, all the links for 61.0.0.0/8 seem to suggest blocking that /8 due to spam. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Jon Lewis *jlewis () lewis org*| I route System Administrator | therefore you are Atlantic Net | _________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________
Current thread:
- 69/8 revisited Rick Ernst (Mar 19)
- Re: 69/8 revisited jlewis (Mar 19)
- Re: 69/8 revisited Scott Granados (Mar 19)
- Re: 69/8 revisited jlewis (Mar 19)
- Re: 69/8 revisited Stephen Sprunk (Mar 19)
- Re: 69/8 revisited jlewis (Mar 19)
- Re: 69/8 revisited Scott Granados (Mar 19)
- Re: 69/8 revisited jlewis (Mar 19)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: 69/8 revisited McBurnett, Jim (Mar 19)
- 69/8 revisited jlewis (Mar 28)
- Re 7/8 - was Re: 69/8 revisited John Palmer (Mar 28)
- Re: Re 7/8 - was Re: 69/8 revisited Haesu (Mar 28)
- Re 7/8 - was Re: 69/8 revisited John Palmer (Mar 28)