nanog mailing list archives
Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks)
From: Richard A Steenbergen <ras () e-gerbil net>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 21:21:39 -0500
On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 06:01:00PM -0800, JC Dill wrote:
Ahem. It's _MS._ Dill, thank you.
Woops, my apologies _MS._ Dill. The JC is ambiguous.
Maybe next time you will stop and think "will this make me look like a sexist idiot in front of engineers across the entire planet"? before posting to a mailing list. (If the shoe fits, wear it.)
Sexist? Now that's just absurd. I took a guess and lost, big deal. If anything, that proves my opinion of your idea has nothing to do with your gender. Get over it.
p.s. Please don't cc me on replies, or on replies to replies, etc. I get the list email just fine and I don't need more than one copy of any given email. Really.
I believe you'll find reply-all is commonly used, get over it. Really. -- Richard A Steenbergen <ras () e-gerbil net> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
Current thread:
- Re: 69/8...this sucks, (continued)
- Re: 69/8...this sucks Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 12)
- Re: 69/8...this sucks Randy Bush (Mar 12)
- Re: 69/8...this sucks Andy Dills (Mar 12)
- Re: 69/8...this sucks Peter E. Fry (Mar 12)
- Re: 69/8...this sucks Andy Dills (Mar 12)
- Re: 69/8...this sucks Charles Sprickman (Mar 11)
- Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) JC Dill (Mar 11)
- Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) Richard A Steenbergen (Mar 11)
- Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) wireworks (Mar 11)
- Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) JC Dill (Mar 11)
- Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) Richard A Steenbergen (Mar 11)
- Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) Adam Rothschild (Mar 11)
- Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) Greg Maxwell (Mar 12)
- Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) JC Dill (Mar 12)
- gender and nanog Randy Bush (Mar 12)
- route filtering in large networks Andy Dills (Mar 12)
- Re: route filtering in large networks Richard A Steenbergen (Mar 12)
- Re: route filtering in large networks Jack Bates (Mar 12)
- RE: route filtering in large networks Michael K. Smith (Mar 12)
- Re: route filtering in large networks Jack Bates (Mar 12)
- Re: route filtering in large networks Peter E. Fry (Mar 12)