nanog mailing list archives

Re: 69/8 revisited


From: "Scott Granados" <scott () wworks net>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 10:49:06 -0800


I've definitely noticed the steady decline in complaints in reachability.  I
think though at some point it will be resolved, after all all the other
blocks got squared away it seems, or is that an incorrect assumption?


----- Original Message -----
From: <jlewis () lewis org>
To: "Rick Ernst" <erond () legendz com>
Cc: <nanog () merit edu>
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 10:26 AM
Subject: Re: 69/8 revisited



On Wed, 19 Mar 2003, Rick Ernst wrote:

Their answer was basically that 69/8 (only) is where they are allocating
from
and that "from reading NANOG, it appears that much of the problem has
been
resolved."

I wonder what they based that ASSumption on?

The thread just sort of died...and now you've revived it.

I haven't seen any updated information that 69/8 is now working for
people.
Is everyone just quiet about it, or have filters actually been updated
making
this a non-issue?

I've been busy with other things, so I haven't been able to spend as much
time on my 69/8 reachability project as I did the first few days.  I still
have a list of about 700 destinations reachable from 209.208/17 but not
from 69/8.  That's down from about 1000 when I did the first ping sweep.
I know I've personally gotten half a dozen or so networks to update their
filtering.  I've also had several messages apparently go ignored (1 week
with no response and no filter update), two of which are US military
/16's.

A bunch of the remaining affected networks are in other countries where
I'm afraid language is going to be a barrier.  This issue will likely
never be entirely resolved.  Just hope your customers don't care about
reaching the remaining affected networks.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Jon Lewis *jlewis () lewis org*|  I route
 System Administrator        |  therefore you are
 Atlantic Net                |
_________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________




Current thread: