nanog mailing list archives
Re: State Super-DMCA Too True
From: Dan Hollis <goemon () anime net>
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2003 17:46:02 -0800 (PST)
On Sun, 30 Mar 2003, William Allen Simpson wrote:
As Larry Blunk points out, to "possess" an encryption device is a felony!
The law as written would seem to make microsoft windows nt/2k/xp/etc illegal to possess. Perhaps someone can print up a bunch of stickers "Under 750.540c enacted 03/31/2003 it is a felony to possess this software/device" and put them on microsoft windows boxes and hardware routers wherever they appear. Wonder how long it will take for someone to discover michigan government officers committing 1000's of felonies... -Dan -- [-] Omae no subete no kichi wa ore no mono da. [-]
Current thread:
- Re: State Super-DMCA Too True, (continued)
- Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Dan Hollis (Mar 30)
- Remembers, Non-Op Topics Have a Home (was Re: State Super-DMCA Too True) Nathan J. Mehl (Mar 31)
- Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Dave Howe (Mar 30)
- Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Dan Hollis (Mar 30)
- Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Jack Bates (Mar 30)
- Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Dan Hollis (Mar 30)
- Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Bruce Pinsky (Mar 30)
- Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Leo Bicknell (Mar 30)
- Re: State Super-DMCA Too True David Lesher (Mar 30)
- Re: State Super-DMCA Too True William Allen Simpson (Mar 30)
- Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Dan Hollis (Mar 30)
- Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Bruce Pinsky (Mar 30)
- Re: State Super-DMCA Too True Michael Airhart (Mar 30)
- Re: is this true or... ? Richard Irving (Mar 28)