nanog mailing list archives
Re: route filtering in large networks
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch () muada com>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 09:06:47 +0100 (CET)
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Randy Bush wrote:
How would the banana eaters screw up applying the same prefix-list outbound to all neighbors?
by spending [some small part of] their time configuring routers as opposed to building tools to configure routers demonstratably correctly.
when fingers 'touch' routers, bad things are bound to happen sooner or later.
Too bad at least several of our collective favorite vendors don't seem to agree, as they don't provide very reasonable methods to update the router configuration in an automated way. Sure, there are ways to make it work but they are too complex to be useful in small networks. Iljitsch (Still waiting for vendors to support automatic filter retrieval from an LDAP server by routers...)
Current thread:
- Re: route filtering in large networks, (continued)
- Re: route filtering in large networks Rob Thomas (Mar 12)
- Re: route filtering in large networks Randy Bush (Mar 12)
- Re: route filtering in large networks E.B. Dreger (Mar 13)
- Re: route filtering in large networks Lars Erik Gullerud (Mar 13)
- Re: route filtering in large networks Alan Hannan (Mar 12)
- Re: route filtering in large networks Randy Bush (Mar 12)
- Re: route filtering in large networks Andy Dills (Mar 12)
- Re: route filtering in large networks Randy Bush (Mar 13)
- Re: route filtering in large networks Dorian Kim (Mar 13)
- Re: route filtering in large networks Stephen Sprunk (Mar 13)
- Re: route filtering in large networks Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 13)
- IETF BOF on Network Configuration (netconf) Sean Donelan (Mar 13)
- RE: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) Vivien M. (Mar 12)
- Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) Jack Bates (Mar 12)
- RE: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) Vivien M. (Mar 12)
- Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) Andy Dills (Mar 12)
- Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 12)
- Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) Owen DeLong (Mar 13)
- Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) Owen DeLong (Mar 13)
- Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) Stephen Sprunk (Mar 12)
- Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) Tim Thorne (Mar 12)