nanog mailing list archives
RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering..
From: "McBurnett, Jim" <jmcburnett () msmgmt com>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 15:26:40 -0500
<SNIP>
Oh, I agree that there are times when BGP is used in a single uplink scenario, but it is not common. However, someone pointed me to ip verify unicast source reachable-via any which seems to be available on some of the cisco Service provider releases. It's an interesting concept and I'm itching to play with it. If you aren't in my routing table, then why accept the IP address? -Jack
Well, If you don't access my address and I happen to be a poor ole 69/8 or <FILL IN NEW NET BLOCK HERE> then your customers may not be able to get to me... But there are an aweful lot of ifs to this ^^^^^^^^^^. And I don't remember that command syntax at all.... Yea, I want to test that too.. Maybe I can make a visit to the local Cisco office and borrow some time in the Lab.... I want to see this is action, and how it may affect my routing... or maybe I can get a quick answer from the local CCIEs... Hey have you checked the Feature Navigator and seen which versions it is in? Catch me off-list.... Later, J
Current thread:
- RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.., (continued)
- RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Mark Segal (Mar 10)
- RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Haesu (Mar 10)
- RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Michael . Dillon (Mar 10)
- RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Rob Thomas (Mar 10)
- Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. James-lists (Mar 10)
- RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Rob Thomas (Mar 10)
- RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Michael . Dillon (Mar 10)
- Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Michael . Dillon (Mar 10)
- RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. McBurnett, Jim (Mar 10)
- Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Jack Bates (Mar 10)
- Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Russell Heilling (Mar 10)
- Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Jack Bates (Mar 10)
- RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. McBurnett, Jim (Mar 10)
- RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Michael Whisenant (Mar 10)
- RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. jlewis (Mar 10)
- RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Michael Whisenant (Mar 11)
- Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Chris Adams (Mar 10)
- RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. jlewis (Mar 10)
- RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Todd A. Blank (Mar 10)
- RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Simon Lyall (Mar 10)
- Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Jack Bates (Mar 10)
- RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. jlewis (Mar 10)
- 202/7 (RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering..) E.B. Dreger (Mar 10)
- Re: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Ray Bellis (Mar 10)
- RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Simon Lyall (Mar 10)
(Thread continues...)
- RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering.. Mark Segal (Mar 10)