nanog mailing list archives

RE: 69/8...this sucks


From: Andy Dills <andy () xecu net>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 13:11:23 -0500 (EST)


On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, Owen DeLong wrote:


In short, it doesn't.  Longer answer, if the ISP configures his router
correctly, he can actually refuse to accept advertisements from other
sessions that are longer versions of prefixes received through this session.

However, it's primarily intended to solve the non-malicious, but somewhat
malignant problem of out-of-date bogon filters by people trying to do the
right thing.

So why does it need to be done by somebody "official"? Why make
organizations who don't have route servers do this?

I've been peering with Rob's bogon server for a little while, and it works
great. All of my customers get routes that point the bogons to a traffic
sink on my network. If they were so inclined, they could sink that traffic
before leaving their network.

Andy

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Andy Dills                              301-682-9972
Xecunet, LLC                            www.xecu.net
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dialup * Webhosting * E-Commerce * High-Speed Access


Current thread: