nanog mailing list archives
Re: Route Supression Problem
From: "Peter E. Fry" <pfry () swbell net>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 10:33:25 -0600
Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Randy Bush wrote:You need at least three flaps to trigger dampening.i guess you really need to look at that pdf.You are right, it is depressing. However, I don't see how the penalty multiplication could happen here, you need a few hops in between for that.
Ah, but this is the Internet. Jack's two upstreams likely have direct or indirect links between them where they will also receive the route updates in question. Should we change the subject (back) to "BGP to doom us all"? Peter E. Fry (I believe I said that without swearing. $#&%*@!)
Current thread:
- Route Supression Problem Jack Bates (Mar 12)
- Re: Route Supression Problem Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 12)
- Re: Route Supression Problem Randy Bush (Mar 12)
- Re: Route Supression Problem Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 12)
- Re: Route Supression Problem Peter E. Fry (Mar 12)
- Re: Route Supression Problem Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 12)
- Re: Route Supression Problem Randy Bush (Mar 12)
- Re: Route Supression Problem Vadim Antonov (Mar 12)
- Re: Route Supression Problem Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 12)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Route Supression Problem Michael . Dillon (Mar 12)
- Re: Route Supression Problem Adam Rothschild (Mar 12)
- Re: Route Supression Problem Danny McPherson (Mar 12)
- Re: Route Supression Problem Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 12)
- Re: Route Supression Problem Jack Bates (Mar 12)
- Re: Route Supression Problem Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 12)
- Re: Route Supression Problem Danny McPherson (Mar 12)