nanog: by date

968 messages starting Mar 01 22 and ending Mar 31 22
Date index | Thread index | Author index


Tuesday, 01 March

Ukraine request yikes George Herbert
RE: Ukraine request yikes Ryan Hamel
Re: Ukraine request yikes Matthew Petach
RE: Certificates for DoT and DoH? David Guo via NANOG
Re: Starlink terminals deployed in Ukraine Dovid Bender
Re: Authoritative Resources for Public DNS Pinging Tom Ivar Helbekkmo via NANOG
Re: Starlink terminals deployed in Ukraine Dave Taht
Re: Starlink terminals deployed in Ukraine ic
Re: Starlink terminals deployed in Ukraine Josh Luthman
Re: Starlink terminals deployed in Ukraine Mike Hammett
Re: Starlink terminals deployed in Ukraine Phineas Walton
Re: Starlink terminals deployed in Ukraine Stephen Strowes
Re: Starlink terminals deployed in Ukraine Crist Clark
Re: Starlink terminals deployed in Ukraine Phineas Walton
Re: Starlink terminals deployed in Ukraine Scott McGrath
Re: Starlink terminals deployed in Ukraine nanog08
Re: Ukraine request yikes David Conrad
Re: Starlink terminals deployed in Ukraine Tom Beecher
RE: Starlink terminals deployed in Ukraine Tony Wicks
Re: Ukraine request yikes Rubens Kuhl
Re: Starlink terminals deployed in Ukraine Brandon Butterworth
Re: Ukraine request yikes David Conrad
Re: Starlink terminals deployed in Ukraine Matthew Petach
Re: Ukraine request yikes Bryan Fields
Re: Starlink terminals deployed in Ukraine Jay Hennigan
Re: Ukraine request yikes Brian R
Re: Ukraine request yikes Daniel Suchy via NANOG
Re: Starlink terminals deployed in Ukraine Dennis Glatting
Re: Ukraine request yikes George Herbert
Re: Starlink terminals deployed in Ukraine Matthew Petach
Re: Ukraine request yikes JASON BOTHE via NANOG
Re: Ukraine request yikes Rubens Kuhl
Re: Ukraine request yikes virendra rode
Re: Ukraine request yikes David Conrad
Re: Ukraine request yikes Fred Baker
Re: Ukraine request yikes Jay Hennigan
RIPE NCC position (Re: Ukraine request yikes) John Curran

Wednesday, 02 March

Re: Starlink terminals deployed in Ukraine Dorn Hetzel
Re: Starlink terminals deployed in Ukraine Tom Beecher
Re: Ukraine request yikes Matt Hoppes
Re: Ukraine request yikes Matt Hoppes
Re: Ukraine request yikes Bruce H McIntosh
Re: Ukraine request yikes Matt Hoppes
Re: Ukraine request yikes Miles Fidelman
Re: Starlink terminals deployed in Ukraine Valdis Klētnieks
Re: Ukraine request yikes Grant Taylor via NANOG
Re: Starlink terminals deployed in Ukraine Michael Thomas
RE: Ukraine request yikes justin
Re: Ukraine request yikes Bryan Fields
Re: Ukraine request yikes John Levine
Re: Starlink terminals deployed in Ukraine Scott McGrath
RIR IRR interfaces Jon Lewis
Re: RIR IRR interfaces Rubens Kuhl
Is soliciting money/rewards for 'responsible' security disclosures when none is stated a thing now? Brie
Re: Is soliciting money/rewards for 'responsible' security disclosures when none is stated a thing now? Kieran Murphy
Re: Starlink terminals deployed in Ukraine Thomas Scott
Re: Starlink terminals deployed in Ukraine Mike
Re: Starlink terminals deployed in Ukraine Karl Auer
Anyone have contacts for Akamai GeoIP Christopher Munz-Michielin
RE: Starlink terminals deployed in Ukraine Tony Wicks
Re: Ukraine request yikes Glen Turner
Re: Anyone have contacts for Akamai GeoIP Jared Mauch
Re: Ukraine request yikes Jay Hennigan
Starlink terminal visual camouflage tests vs improvised fabric materials Eric Kuhnke
Re: Starlink terminals deployed in Ukraine Eric Kuhnke
Re: Starlink terminal visual camouflage tests vs improvised fabric materials Michael Thomas
Re: Ukraine request yikes Carsten Bormann
Re: Starlink terminals deployed in Ukraine Mike
Re: Ukraine request yikes John Levine
Re: Is soliciting money/rewards for 'responsible' security disclosures when none is stated a thing now? Valdis Klētnieks
Re: Starlink terminals deployed in Ukraine bzs
Re: Starlink terminals deployed in Ukraine Karl Auer
Conflicts and fiber cuts Hank Nussbacher
Re: Starlink terminals deployed in Ukraine bzs
Re: Starlink terminals deployed in Ukraine bzs

Thursday, 03 March

ICANN Response (Re: Ukraine request yikes) John Curran
Re: ICANN Response (Re: Ukraine request yikes) Jorge Amodio
Re: ICANN Response (Re: Ukraine request yikes) Jason Kuehl
Re: Starlink terminals deployed in Ukraine Dorn Hetzel
Re: ICANN Response (Re: Ukraine request yikes) Brian R
Re: Starlink terminals deployed in Ukraine Matthew Petach
Saw 40-45% packet loss on both Lumen and ATT MPLS backbones Shahid Shafi
Re: ICANN Response (Re: Ukraine request yikes) Sean Donelan

Friday, 04 March

P.C Picks: Best of NANOG 84 👉WATCH NOW: N84 Full Webcast Nanog News
Weekly Global IPv4 Routing Table Report Routing Table Analysis Role Account
Cogent cutting links to Russia? Michael Thomas
Re: Cogent cutting links to Russia? Andy Ringsmuth
RE: Cogent cutting links to Russia? John Covici
Re: Cogent cutting links to Russia? Anne Mitchell
Re: Cogent cutting links to Russia? Michael Thomas
Re: Cogent cutting links to Russia? Brandon Svec via NANOG
Re: Cogent cutting links to Russia? Rubens Kuhl
Re: Cogent cutting links to Russia? Ethan O'Toole
Re: Cogent cutting links to Russia? Brandon Svec via NANOG
Re: Cogent cutting links to Russia? Martin Hannigan
Re: Cogent cutting links to Russia? Bryan Fields
Re: Is soliciting money/rewards for 'responsible' security disclosures when none is stated a thing now? Denys Fedoryshchenko
Re: Cogent cutting links to Russia? Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: Cogent cutting links to Russia? David Conrad
Re: Cogent cutting links to Russia? Matthew Petach
Re: Cogent cutting links to Russia? Michael Thomas
Re: Starlink terminals deployed in Ukraine Scott McGrath
Re: Cogent cutting links to Russia? Aaron Wendel
Re: Cogent cutting links to Russia? Lady Benjamin Cannon of Glencoe
Re: Is soliciting money/rewards for 'responsible' security disclosures when none is stated a thing now? Joe Greco
Re: Cogent cutting links to Russia? William Herrin
Re: Cogent cutting links to Russia? Rubens Kuhl
Re: Cogent cutting links to Russia? Tom Beecher
Re: Cogent cutting links to Russia? Jorge Amodio
RU evidently hijacked UA netblock George Herbert
Re: RU evidently hijacked UA netblock Scott Weeks
Retracted: Re: RU evidently hijacked UA netblock George Herbert
Re: RU evidently hijacked UA netblock Jay Hennigan
Re: Is soliciting money/rewards for 'responsible' security disclosures when none is stated a thing now? Aaron de Bruyn via NANOG
Re: Cogent cutting links to Russia? Sean Donelan
Re: RU evidently hijacked UA netblock Scott Weeks
Re: Cogent cutting links to Russia? Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: RU evidently hijacked UA netblock Erik Sundberg
Re: Cogent cutting links to Russia? Masataka Ohta
Re: Cogent cutting links to Russia? Matthew Petach

Saturday, 05 March

Re: Cogent cutting links to Russia? Masataka Ohta
identity.cisco.com certificate has expired Matthew Huff
Washington–Moscow Direct Communications Link Sean Donelan
Re: Washington–Moscow Direct Communications Link Michael Thomas
Re: Washington–Moscow Direct Communications Link Lou D
Re: Washington–Moscow Direct Communications Link Andy Ringsmuth
Re: identity.cisco.com certificate has expired Hank Nussbacher

Sunday, 06 March

Russia to disconnect from global Internet Jared Brown
Re: Russia to disconnect from global Internet Jared Brown
Re: Conflicts and fiber cuts Mike Hammett
Re: Russia to disconnect from global Internet Fred Baker
Re: Conflicts and fiber cuts Sean Donelan
RE: Russia to disconnect from global Internet Andrew Bosch via NANOG
Re: Russia to disconnect from global Internet Bill Woodcock
Re: Conflicts and fiber cuts Laura Smith via NANOG
Re: Conflicts and fiber cuts Sean Donelan
Re: Russia to disconnect from global Internet Jay Hennigan
Re: Russia to disconnect from global Internet Jorge Amodio
Re: Russia to disconnect from global Internet J. Hellenthal via NANOG
Transmission of tornado warnings delayed by major NWS tech issue Sean Donelan

Monday, 07 March

Re: Russia to disconnect from global Internet Stephane Bortzmeyer
Re: Russia to disconnect from global Internet Bill Woodcock
Re: Conflicts and fiber cuts Laura Smith via NANOG
Re: Russia to disconnect from global Internet Bjørn Mork
Re: Cogent cutting links to Russia? JeffP
Re: Cogent cutting links to Russia? Nicole H.
Re: Cogent cutting links to Russia? Tom Beecher
Re: Cogent cutting links to Russia? Masataka Ohta
Re: Cogent cutting links to Russia? Masataka Ohta
Re: Cogent cutting links to Russia? J. Hellenthal via NANOG
Vodafone-UA Lady Benjamin Cannon of Glencoe
Re: Vodafone-UA Laura Smith via NANOG
Re: Russia to disconnect from global Internet Hank Nussbacher
Re: Russia to disconnect from global Internet Bill Woodcock
Re: Russia to disconnect from global Internet Sean Donelan
Re: Cogent cutting links to Russia? JeffP
Re: Russia to disconnect from global Internet Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: Cogent cutting links to Russia? Owen DeLong via NANOG
Reminder to Submit Presentations for NANOG 85 Cat Gurinsky
Susan Harris John Kristoff
Re: Susan Harris Rabbi Rob Thomas
off-topic: net-sec presentations (routing, DNS, and DoS) Amir Herzberg
SATCOM terminals under attack in Europe Hank Nussbacher

Tuesday, 08 March

Can someone from AS12874 contact me off list please Walt
Re: Can someone from AS12874 contact me off list please Marco Paesani
202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock Abraham Y. Chen
RE: SATCOM terminals under attack in Europe Mike Lewinski via NANOG
Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock Tom Beecher
202203080924.AYC Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock Abraham Y. Chen
CC:s to Non List Members (was Re: 202203080924.AYC Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock) Anne Mitchell
Spoofer Report for NANOG for Feb 2022 CAIDA Spoofer Project
Re: CC: s to Non List Members (was Re: 202203080924.AYC Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock) John Levine
Re: CC: s to Non List Members (was Re: 202203080924.AYC Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock) William Herrin
Fwd: Upwork Suspending Operations in Russia and Belarus Callan Banner
Re: Upwork Suspending Operations in Russia and Belarus Mike Hammett
VoLTE and SRTP Michael Thomas
Re: VoLTE and SRTP Raymond Burkholder
Re: VoLTE and SRTP Brandon Svec via NANOG
Re: VoLTE and SRTP Michael Thomas
Re: Fwd: Upwork Suspending Operations in Russia and Belarus Jay Hennigan
Re: Upwork Suspending Operations in Russia and Belarus brian . johnson
Re: CC: s to Non List Members (was Re: 202203080924.AYC Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock) John Levine
Re: CC: s to Non List Members (was Re: 202203080924.AYC Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock) Tom Beecher
Re: VoLTE and SRTP Tom Beecher
Re: VoLTE and SRTP Sean Donelan
Re: VoLTE and SRTP Michael Thomas
Re: CC: s to Non List Members (was Re: 202203080924.AYC Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock) John Kristoff
Re: CC: s to Non List Members (was Re: 202203080924.AYC Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock) Nathan Angelacos
Re: CC: s to Non List Members (was Re: 202203080924.AYC Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock) Masataka Ohta
Re: CC: s to Non List Members (was Re: 202203080924.AYC Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock) John R. Levine
Re: CC: s to Non List Members (was Re: 202203080924.AYC Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock) Seth David Schoen
Re: CC: s to Non List Members (was Re: 202203080924.AYC Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock) Seth David Schoen
Re: CC: s to Non List Members (was Re: 202203080924.AYC Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock) Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: CC: s to Non List Members (was Re: 202203080924.AYC Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock) Mark Andrews
Re: CC: s to Non List Members (was Re: 202203080924.AYC Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock) Dave Taht
Re: CC: s to Non List Members (was Re: 202203080924.AYC Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock) bzs

Wednesday, 09 March

Re: CC: s to Non List Members (was Re: 202203080924.AYC Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock) John Gilmore
Asia Apac networks Edvinas Kairys
202203081821.AYC Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock Abraham Y. Chen
Re: CC: s to Non List Members (was Re: 202203080924.AYC Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock) Tom Beecher
Re: CC: s to Non List Members (was Re: 202203080924.AYC Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock) Tom Hill
Re: CC: s to Non List Members (was Re: 202203080924.AYC Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock) Tim Howe
Re: 202203090732.AYC Re: CC: s to Non List Members (was Re: 202203080924.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock) William Herrin
V6 still not supported (was Re: CC: s to Non List Members (was Re: 202203080924.AYC Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock)) David Conrad
Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock John R. Levine
Re: 202203090732.AYC Re: CC: s to Non List Members (was Re: 202203080924.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock) Mel Beckman
Re: 202203090732.AYC Re: CC: s to Non List Members (was Re: 202203080924.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock) Mel Beckman
Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock Seth Mattinen
Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock David Conrad
Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock John Levine
Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock John Kristoff
Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock William Herrin
Re: V6 still not supported (was Re: CC: s to Non List Members (was Re: 202203080924.AYC Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock)) Joe Greco
Re: V6 still not supported Grant Taylor via NANOG
Re: V6 still not supported (was Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock) Tim Howe
Re: V6 still not supported (was Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock) Dave Taht
Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock David Conrad
Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock David Conrad
Re: V6 still not supported Jay Hennigan
Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock John R. Levine
RE: WISPA (was Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock) Travis Garrison
RE: WISPA (was Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock) Dennis Burgess
Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock John Levine
Re: V6 still not supported Grant Taylor via NANOG
Re: V6 still not supported Josh Luthman
Re: V6 still not supported Seth Mattinen
Re: V6 still not supported Michael Thomas
Re: V6 still not supported Josh Luthman
Re: V6 still not supported Michael Thomas
Re: V6 still not supported Tom Beecher
Re: V6 still not supported Tim Howe
Re: V6 still not supported Andy Ringsmuth
Re: V6 still not supported Jay Hennigan
Re: V6 still not supported Gary E. Miller
Re: V6 still not supported Tom Hill
Re: V6 still not supported Randy Carpenter
RE: V6 still not supported Tony Wicks
NANOG 85 Call for Presentations + More Nanog News
Re: 202203090732.AYC Re: CC: s to Non List Members (was Re: 202203080924.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock) Abraham Y. Chen
Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock Masataka Ohta
Re: V6 still not supported (was Re: CC: s to Non List Members (was Re: 202203080924.AYC Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock)) Saku Ytti

Thursday, 10 March

The role of Internet governance in sanctions Bill Woodcock
Re: V6 still not supported (was Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock)) Masataka Ohta
Re: The role of Internet governance in sanctions Randy Bush
Re: The role of Internet governance in sanctions Bill Woodcock
Re: The role of Internet governance in sanctions Randy Bush
Re: V6 still not supported (was Re: CC: s to Non List Members (was Re: 202203080924.AYC Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock)) Joe Greco
Re: V6 still not supported Josh Luthman
Re: V6 still not supported Josh Luthman
Re: V6 still not supported Tom Beecher
Re: The role of Internet governance in sanctions Mel Beckman
Re: The role of Internet governance in sanctions jim deleskie
Re: V6 still not supported Josh Luthman
Re: The role of Internet governance in sanctions Michael Hallgren
Re: V6 still not supported (was Re: CC: s to Non List Members (was Re: 202203080924.AYC Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock)) Ca By
Re: V6 still not supported Matthew Walster
Re: The role of Internet governance in sanctions Bill Woodcock
Re: The role of Internet governance in sanctions Mel Beckman
Re: The role of Internet governance in sanctions Tom Beecher
Re: V6 still not supported (was Re: CC: s to Non List Members (was Re: 202203080924.AYC Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock)) Tom Beecher
Re: V6 still not supported (was Re: CC: s to Non List Members (was Re: 202203080924.AYC Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock)) Saku Ytti
Re: CC: s to Non List Members (was Re: 202203080924.AYC Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock) Joe Maimon
Re: CC: s to Non List Members (was Re: 202203080924.AYC Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock) Joe Maimon
Re: WISPA (was Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock) Jeremy Austin
Re: The role of Internet governance in sanctions Mel Beckman
Russia attempts mandating installation of root CA on clients for TLS MITM Eric Kuhnke
Re: V6 still not supported (was Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock)) Matthew Walster
Re: The role of Internet governance in sanctions Bill Woodcock
Re udp port overload on ipv4 (was Re: V6 still not supported) Dave Taht
Re: Re udp port overload on ipv4 (was Re: V6 still not supported) William Herrin
RE: WISPA (was Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock) netElastic Systems
Re: Re udp port overload on ipv4 (was Re: V6 still not supported) Matthew Walster
RE: V6 still not supported netElastic Systems
Re: The role of Internet governance in sanctions Mel Beckman
Re: V6 still not supported Josh Luthman
Re: V6 still not supported Bryan Fields
Re: V6 still not supported Robert L Mathews
Re: Re udp port overload on ipv4 (was Re: V6 still not supported) Grzegorz Janoszka
Fwd: Re: The role of Internet governance in sanctions surfer
Re: The role of Internet governance in sanctions bzs
Re: V6 still not supported bzs
Re: Russia attempts mandating installation of root CA on clients for TLS MITM Jay R. Ashworth
Re: V6 still not supported Ca By
Re: Russia attempts mandating installation of root CA on clients for TLS MITM William Herrin
Re: V6 still not supported Randy Bush
Re: Russia attempts mandating installation of root CA on clients for TLS MITM Sean Donelan
Re: V6 still not supported Joe Maimon
RE: The role of Internet governance in sanctions Brandon Price
Re: V6 still not supported Masataka Ohta
Re: Russia attempts mandating installation of root CA on clients for TLS MITM Dario Ciccarone (dciccaro) via NANOG
Re: Asia Apac networks Lou D
Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock Abraham Y. Chen
Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock William Herrin
Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock Masataka Ohta
Re: Asia Apac networks Lady Benjamin Cannon of Glencoe, ASCE
Re: V6 still not supported Christopher Morrow
Re: Asia Apac networks Siyuan Miao

Friday, 11 March

Re: Asia Apac networks Jon Lewis
The role of Internet governance in sanctions Sylvain Baya
Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock Abraham Y. Chen
Re: The role of Internet governance in sanctions Mel Beckman
Re: V6 still not supported (was Re: CC: s to Non List Members, (was Re: 202203080924.AYC Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4, NetBlock)) Abraham Y. Chen
Re: V6 still not supported (was Re: CC: s to Non List Members, (was Re: 202203080924.AYC Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4, NetBlock)) Ca By
Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock William Herrin
Re: V6 still not supported (was Re: CC: s to Non List Members, (was Re: 202203080924.AYC Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4, NetBlock)) Joe Maimon
Re: V6 still not supported (was Re: CC: s to Non List Members, (was Re: 202203080924.AYC Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4, NetBlock)) Grant Taylor via NANOG
Re: V6 still not supported (was Re: CC: s to Non List Members, (was Re: 202203080924.AYC Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4, NetBlock)) Joe Maimon
Weekly Global IPv4 Routing Table Report Routing Table Analysis Role Account
Re: Russia attempts mandating installation of root CA on clients for TLS MITM Eric Kuhnke
Re: Russia attempts mandating installation of root CA on clients for TLS MITM Eric Kuhnke
Re: Cogent cutting links to Russia? Martin Hannigan
Re: V6 still not supported (was Re: CC: s to Non List Members, (was Re: 202203080924.AYC Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4, NetBlock)) Abraham Y. Chen
Re: V6 still widely supported (was Re: CC: s to Non List Members, John Levine
Re: V6 still widely supported (was Re: CC: s to Non List Members, David Conrad
Re: V6 still widely supported (was Re: CC: s to Non List Members, John Covici
Re: V6 still widely supported (was Re: CC: s to Non List Members, Josh Luthman
Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock Greg Skinner via NANOG

Saturday, 12 March

Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG
Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock William Herrin
Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG
Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock Abraham Y. Chen
Re: CC: s to Non List Members (was Re: 202203080924.AYC Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock) Greg Skinner via NANOG
Re: Russia attempts mandating installation of root CA on clients for TLS MITM Sean Donelan

Sunday, 13 March

Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock Saku Ytti
Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock Joe Maimon
Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock Joe Maimon
Re: Russia attempts mandating installation of root CA on clients for TLS MITM Carsten Bormann
Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock William Herrin
Re: Russia attempts mandating installation of root CA on clients for TLS MITM Masataka Ohta
Re: Not Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock John Levine
Re: Russia attempts mandating installation of root CA on clients for TLS MITM Miles Fidelman
Re: Not Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock Randy Bush
Re: V6 still widely supported (was Re: CC: s to Non List Members, Christopher Morrow
Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock Christopher Morrow
Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock Joe Maimon
Re: Not Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock bzs
Re: Not Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock Niels Bakker
Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock William Herrin
Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock Abraham Y. Chen
Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock Christopher Morrow
Re: V6 still not supported (was Re: CC: s to Non List Members, (was Re: 202203080924.AYC Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4, NetBlock)) Fred Baker
Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock Re: 202203140004.AYC Abraham Y. Chen
Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock Fred Baker

Monday, 14 March

Re: V6 still not supported (was Re: CC: s to Non List Members, (was Re: 202203080924.AYC Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4, NetBlock)) Daniel Karrenberg
Geolocation Data : MAX MIND - Out of Sync Paschal Masha
Re: Russia attempts mandating installation of root CA on clients for TLS MITM Mu
Docusign Bruno Vane
Dropping support for the .ru top level domain Patrick Bryant
Re: Dropping support for the .ru top level domain Christopher Morrow
Re: Dropping support for the .ru top level domain J. Hellenthal via NANOG
RE: Dropping support for the .ru top level domain Kain, Becki (.)
Re: Dropping support for the .ru top level domain Bill Woodcock
Re: Dropping support for the .ru top level domain William Herrin
Re: Dropping support for the .ru top level domain jim deleskie
Re: Dropping support for the .ru top level domain Mel Beckman
Re: Docusign Udeme Ukutt
Re: Docusign Peter Potvin via NANOG
Re: Geolocation Data : MAX MIND - Out of Sync Peter Potvin via NANOG
Re: Docusign Udeme
Re: Dropping support for the .ru top level domain james.cutler () consultant com
Re: Dropping support for the .ru top level domain james.cutler () consultant com
Re: V6 still not supported (was Re: CC: s to Non List, Members, (was Making Use of 240/4, NetBlock)) Abraham Y. Chen
Juniper vMX Trial - fake news? Jon Sands
Re: Juniper vMX Trial - fake news? Daryl G. Jurbala
Re: Juniper vMX Trial - fake news? Tom Beecher
Re: Juniper vMX Trial - fake news? Matt Harris
Re: Juniper vMX Trial - fake news? Jason Biel
Re: Juniper vMX Trial - fake news? Tom Beecher
Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock Re: 202203141407.AYC Abraham Y. Chen
Re: Juniper vMX Trial - fake news? Thomas Scott
Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock Re: 202203141407.AYC Tom Beecher
Re: Juniper vMX Trial - fake news? heasley
Re: Dropping support for the .ru top level domain Denys Fedoryshchenko
Re: Dropping support for the .ru top level domain Brian R
Re: Not Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock bzs
Re: Dropping support for the .ru top level domain Fred Baker
Re: Dropping support for the .ru top level domain Mel Beckman
Re: Dropping support for the .ru top level domain Brian R

Tuesday, 15 March

Re: Dropping support for the .ru top level domain Patrick Bryant
Not Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock Sylvain Baya
Viaplay wrongly classifies IP as VPN Jimmy Huijbrechts
Re: Dropping support for the .ru top level domain brian . johnson
Re: Dropping support for the .ru top level domain Alexander Maassen
Re: Not Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: Dropping support for the .ru top level domain Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: Dropping support for the .ru top level domain Mel Beckman
Bombs and Hackers are Battering Ukraine's Internet Providers Sean Donelan
RE: Bombs and Hackers are Battering Ukraine's Internet Providers Kain, Becki (.)
Re: Bombs and Hackers are Battering Ukraine's Internet Providers Martin Hannigan
FCC Foreign SPonsorship Identification Rules Go Into Effect Sean Donelan
Re: Dropping support for the .ru top level domain Tom Beecher
"Permanent" DST Jay R. Ashworth
Re: "Permanent" DST Dave
Re: "Permanent" DST Mel Beckman
Re: "Permanent" DST Jay Hennigan
Re: "Permanent" DST Collider
RE: "Permanent" DST Ray Van Dolson via NANOG
Re: "Permanent" DST Jay R. Ashworth
Re: "Permanent" DST PJ Capelli via NANOG
Re: "Permanent" DST William Herrin
Re: "Permanent" DST hak
RE: "Permanent" DST Kain, Becki (.)
Re: "Permanent" DST Eric Kuhnke
Re: "Permanent" DST Mel Beckman
Re: "Permanent" DST Jay Hennigan
Re: "Permanent" DST Mel Beckman
Re: "Permanent" DST Brian R
Re: "Permanent" DST Thomas Scott
RE: "Permanent" DST Kain, Becki (.)
Re: "Permanent" DST Jay Hennigan
Re: "Permanent" DST Dave
Re: "Permanent" DST james.cutler () consultant com
Re: "Permanent" DST brian . johnson
Re: "Permanent" DST Joly MacFie
Re: "Permanent" DST Andy Ringsmuth
Re: "Permanent" DST Peter Potvin via NANOG
Re: "Permanent" DST Michael Lambert
Re: "Permanent" DST Michael Lambert
Re: "Permanent" DST Elmar K. Bins
Re: "Permanent" DST james.cutler () consultant com
RE: "Permanent" DST Kain, Becki (.)
Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock Re: 202203151549.AYC Abraham Y. Chen
Re: "Permanent" DST Paul Ebersman
Re: "Permanent" DST Eric Kuhnke
Re: "Permanent" DST Jay Ashworth
Re: "Permanent" DST Eric Tykwinski
Re: "Permanent" DST Jay Hennigan
Re: "Permanent" DST Jay Ashworth
Re: "Permanent" DST Mel Beckman
Re: "Permanent" DST Roy
RE: "Permanent" DST Jason Baugher
Re: "Permanent" DST Tom Beecher
RE: "Permanent" DST Jason Baugher
Re: "Permanent" DST Brandon Svec via NANOG
RE: "Permanent" DST Jason Baugher
RE: "Permanent" DST Jason Baugher
Re: "Permanent" DST William Astle
Re: "Permanent" DST surfer
Re: "Permanent" DST John Osmon
Re: Bombs and Hackers are Battering Ukraine's Internet Providers surfer
Re: "Permanent" DST Jay R. Ashworth
Re: "Permanent" DST Tom Beecher
Re: "Permanent" DST Fred Baker
Re: "Permanent" DST George Herbert
Re: "Permanent" DST Joe Greco
Re: "Permanent" DST Jan Schaumann via NANOG
Re: "Permanent" DST Matthew Petach
RE: "Permanent" DST Matthew Huff
Re: "Permanent" DST Randy Bush
Re: "Permanent" DST John Levine
Re: "Permanent" DST Jay Ashworth
Re: "Permanent" DST Ishmael Rufus
Re: "Permanent" DST Jay Ashworth
Re: "Permanent" DST Keith Stokes
Re: "Permanent" DST Roy
Re: "Permanent" DST Chris Adams
Re: "Permanent" DST Jay R. Ashworth
Re: "Permanent" DST Chris Adams
Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock Re: 202203151549.AYC Mark Andrews
Re: Not Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock Mark Andrews
Re: "Permanent" DST Sabri Berisha
Re: Not Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock bzs
Re: "Permanent" DST Jay Hennigan
Re: "Permanent" DST Doug Barton
Re: "Permanent" DST hak

Wednesday, 16 March

Sprint contact - stop bgp announcement Elvis Daniel Velea
Re: V6 still not supported John Gilmore
Re: Sprint contact - stop bgp announcement Marco Paesani
Re: "Permanent" DST Tom Beecher
Re: CC: s to Non List Members (was Re: 202203080924.AYC Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock) Tom Beecher
Re: "Permanent" DST Carsten Bormann
Re: "Permanent" DST Mike Hammett
Re: "Permanent" DST Mike Hammett
Re: "Permanent" DST Fred Baker
Re: "Permanent" DST Aaron C. de Bruyn via NANOG
Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock Re: 202203161019.AYC Abraham Y. Chen
Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock Re: 202203161019.AYC Tom Beecher
Re: "Permanent" DST Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: "Permanent" DST Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: V6 still not supported Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: "Permanent" DST Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: Not Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: "Permanent" DST Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: V6 still not supported james.cutler () consultant com
Re: "Permanent" DST John Levine
Re: "Permanent" DST Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: "Permanent" DST Jay R. Ashworth
Re: "Permanent" DST Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: "Permanent" DST Tom Beecher
Re: "Permanent" DST Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: V6 still not supported David Bass
Re: "Permanent" DST Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: V6 still not supported Owen DeLong via NANOG
Latest from ICANN: Quantum Computers + N85 Peering Forum Nanog News
Re: "Permanent" DST Chris Adams
Re: "Permanent" DST Jay Hennigan
Re: "Permanent" DST Matthew Kaufman
Re: "Permanent" DST surfer
Re: "Permanent" DST Ask Bjørn Hansen
Re: "Permanent" DST John Levine
Re: "Permanent" DST John Levine
Re: CC: s to Non List Members (was Re: 202203080924.AYC Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock) Greg Skinner via NANOG
Re: Not Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock Mark Andrews
Regarding BGP offloading Anurag Bhatia
Re: Regarding BGP offloading Yang Yu
Re: Regarding BGP offloading Yang Yu
Re: Regarding BGP offloading Jeff Tantsura
Re: V6 still not supported John Gilmore
Re: V6 still not supported William Allen Simpson
Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock Re: 202203162242.AYC Abraham Y. Chen
Re: V6 still not supported William Allen Simpson
Re: V6 still not supported Saku Ytti

Thursday, 17 March

RE: V6 still not supported Pascal Thubert (pthubert) via NANOG
Re: V6 still not supported borg
Re: V6 still not supported Tom Beecher
RE: V6 still not supported Matthew Huff
Re: V6 still not supported Dave Bell
RE: V6 still not supported Matthew Huff
Re: "Permanent" DST Joe Loiacono
Re: V6 still not supported borg
RE: V6 still not supported borg
Re: V6 still not supported Tom Beecher
Re: V6 still not supported Tom Beecher
Re: Not Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock Re: 202203171125.AYC Abraham Y. Chen
Looking for a BGP/Routing/NOC contact at Comcast Business... Cruze, Brian A via NANOG
Re: CC: s to Non List Members (Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock Re: 202203171135.AYC Abraham Y. Chen
Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock Re: 202203171153.AYC Abraham Y. Chen
Re: CC: s to Non List Members (Was Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock) Re: 2022031711315.AYC Abraham Y. Chen
Network Policies Towards Software Supply Chain Compromise Matt Corallo
Re: Russia attempts mandating installation of root CA on clients for TLS MITM Sean Donelan
Re: "Permanent" DST Owen DeLong via NANOG
Ukraine electric grid now synced with Europe grid (year ahead of schedule) Sean Donelan
Re: "Permanent" DST Brett Frankenberger
are underwater routers a thing? Michael Thomas
Re: V6 still not supported Michael Thomas
RE: are underwater routers a thing? Jerry Cloe
Re: are underwater routers a thing? Andy Ringsmuth
Re: are underwater routers a thing? John Levine
Re: are underwater routers a thing? Karl Auer
Re: are underwater routers a thing? Justin Streiner
Re: are underwater routers a thing? Christopher Morrow
Re: are underwater routers a thing? Lady Benjamin Cannon of Glencoe
Re: are underwater routers a thing? H.Shrikumar
Re: are underwater routers a thing? Karl Auer
Re: are underwater routers a thing? Joel Jaeggli
Re: V6 still not supported Matt Hoppes

Friday, 18 March

Re: V6 still not supported borg
Re: V6 still not supported borg
Re: Latest from ICANN: Quantum Computers + N85 Peering Forum Masataka Ohta
For those in the Phoenix area - ARIN on the Road taking place 29 March 2022 John Curran
FCC docket on BGP routing vulnerabilities Andrew Hadenfeldt
Re: "Permanent" DST J. Hellenthal via NANOG
Zayo contact help? Ray Bellis
Re: are underwater routers a thing? Ethan O'Toole
Re: V6 still not supported Re: 202203181137.AYC Abraham Y. Chen
Re: V6 still not supported Re: 202203181218.AYC Abraham Y. Chen
Re: V6 still not supported John Levine
Weekly Global IPv4 Routing Table Report Routing Table Analysis Role Account
Re: V6 still not supported Michael Thomas
Re: V6 still not supported Tom Ivar Helbekkmo via NANOG
Re: V6 still not supported Michael Thomas
Re: V6 still not supported Nathan Angelacos
Re: V6 still not supported Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: V6 still not supported Michael Thomas
Re: V6 still not supported surfer
Re: V6 still not supported Michael Thomas
Re: V6 still not supported bzs
Re: V6 still not supported Michael Thomas
Re: V6 still not supported bzs

Saturday, 19 March

Re: V6 still not supported Saku Ytti
Re: BOOTP & ARP history John Gilmore
Re: BOOTP & ARP history Michael Thomas
Re: BOOTP & ARP history James R Cutler
Re: BOOTP & ARP history Michael Thomas
IPv6 "bloat" Michael Thomas
Re: V6 still not supported Matt Hoppes
Re: IPv6 "bloat" Matt Hoppes
Re: IPv6 "bloat" Michael Thomas
Re: IPv6 "bloat" Matt Hoppes
Re: IPv6 "bloat" Michael Thomas
Re: V6 still not supported Tom Beecher
Re: IPv6 "bloat" Matt Hoppes
Re: IPv6 "bloat" Tom Beecher
Re: IPv6 "bloat" Michael Thomas
Re: IPv6 "bloat" Matt Hoppes
Re: V6 still not supported John Levine
Re: V6 still not supported Mark Delany
Re: V6 still not supported Randy Carpenter
Re: IPv6 "bloat" Owen DeLong via NANOG

Sunday, 20 March

Re: Latest from ICANN: Quantum Computers + N85 Peering Forum Masataka Ohta
Re: V6 still not supported Masataka Ohta
Re: V6 still not supported borg
Re: V6 still not supported Masataka Ohta
Re: IPv6 "bloat" Enno Rey
Re: BOOTP & ARP history Masataka Ohta
Re: IPv6 "bloat" Lady Benjamin Cannon of Glencoe
Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock Re: 202203151549.AYC Greg Skinner via NANOG
Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock Re: 202203151549.AYC John Levine
Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock Re: 202203151549.AYC Tom Beecher
Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock Re: 202203151549.AYC Greg Skinner via NANOG
Re: IPv6 "bloat" Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: IPv6 "bloat" Crist Clark
Re: IPv6 "bloat" Masataka Ohta

Monday, 21 March

Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock Re: 202203151549.AYC Joe Maimon
Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock Re: 202203151549.AYC Randy Bush
VPN-enabled advance fee fraud Andrew G. Watters
RE: V6 still not supported Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG
Survey on DNS resolver operations and DNSSEC Moritz Müller via NANOG
A quick note of appreciation Etienne-Victor Depasquale via NANOG
Standards Compliant Mail Client Re: V6 still not supported Re: 202203211201.AYC Abraham Y. Chen
Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock Re: 202203210953.AYC Abraham Y. Chen
Re: VPN-enabled advance fee fraud Jay Hennigan
Re: VPN-enabled advance fee fraud TJ Trout
Re: VPN-enabled advance fee fraud Josh Luthman
Re: Standards Compliant Mail Client Re: V6 still not supported Re: 202203211201.AYC Grant Taylor via NANOG
Re: VPN-enabled advance fee fraud Matthew Kaufman
Re: VPN-enabled advance fee fraud Grant Taylor via NANOG
Re: IPv6 "bloat" Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: V6 still not supported Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: VPN-enabled advance fee fraud Jay Hennigan
Re: V6 still not supported John Curran
Re: V6 still not supported Bjørn Mork
Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock Re: 202203210955.AYC Abraham Y. Chen
Re: VPN-enabled advance fee fraud Grant Taylor via NANOG
Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock Re: 202203210957.AYC Abraham Y. Chen
Re: VPN-enabled advance fee fraud Mark Seiden
Re: V6 still not supported John Curran
Re: Standards Compliant Mail Client Re: V6 still not supported Re: 202203211201.AYC William Herrin
Re: Standards Compliant Mail Client Re: V6 still not supported Re: 202203211201.AYC Bryan Fields

Tuesday, 22 March

Re: V6 still not supported Masataka Ohta
Re: V6 still not supported John Curran
Telus contact re: VPN services (ESP, SSL) impacted, Vancouver -> Las Vegas Hugo Slabbert
Re: V6 still not supported Randy Bush
Any engineers from HE on the list? Shawn L via NANOG
Re: V6 still not supported Masataka Ohta
Re: IPv6 "bloat" Masataka Ohta
V6 still not supported Daniel Karrenberg
RE: V6 still not supported Pascal Thubert (pthubert) via NANOG
Re: V6 still not supported Randy Bush
Re: V6 still not supported Joe Maimon
RE: V6 still not supported Pascal Thubert (pthubert) via NANOG
Re: V6 still not supported Randy Bush
Re: IPv6 "bloat" history William Allen Simpson
Re: V6 still not supported Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: Any engineers from HE on the list? Shawn L via NANOG
Re: V6 still not supported Michael Thomas
Re: V6 still not supported Christopher Morrow
Re: V6 still not supported Michael Thomas
Re: V6 still not supported George Michaelson
Re: V6 still not supported bzs
Re: V6 still not supported Joe Maimon
Re: V6 still not supported Joe Maimon
Re: IPv6 "bloat" history Masataka Ohta

Wednesday, 23 March

RE: V6 still not supported Pascal Thubert (pthubert) via NANOG
Re: Telus contact re: VPN services (ESP, SSL) impacted, Vancouver -> Las Vegas Hugo Slabbert
Re: V6 still not supported Re: 202203231017.AYC Abraham Y. Chen
Re: V6 still not supported Michael Thomas
RE: V6 still not supported Re: 202203231017.AYC Pascal Thubert (pthubert) via NANOG
Re: V6 still not supported John Curran
Re: V6 still not supported Joe Maimon
Re: V6 still not supported Michael Thomas
BCP 235 John Kristoff
Re: V6 still not supported Joe Maimon
Re: V6 still not supported Michael Thomas
Re: V6 still not supported Joe Maimon
Re: V6 still not supported james.cutler () consultant com
Bufferbloat and the pandemic was: V6 still not supported Michael Thomas
Re: V6 still not supported Joe Maimon
Re: Bufferbloat and the pandemic was: V6 still not supported John Levine
Reason for delayed tornado warnings in Iowa Sean Donelan
Re: V6 still not supported Joe Maimon
Re: Bufferbloat and the pandemic was: V6 still not supported Michael Thomas
Re: V6 still not supported John Curran
Re: V6 still not supported Joe Maimon
Historic/Retired Routing Registry Dan Mahoney
Re: Historic/Retired Routing Registry Brian R
Re: Historic/Retired Routing Registry Bryan Fields
Re: V6 still not supported Owen DeLong via NANOG

Thursday, 24 March

Re: V6 still not supported Greg Skinner via NANOG
Re: V6 still not supported Mark Delany
RE: V6 still not supported Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG
Re: V6 still not supported Mark Delany
Re: V6 still not supported Joe Maimon
Re: V6 still not supported Joe Maimon
Re: V6 still not supported Joe Maimon
RE: V6 still not supported Pascal Thubert (pthubert) via NANOG
ISP data collection from home routers Giovane C. M. Moura via NANOG
Re: V6 still not supported Masataka Ohta
RE: ISP data collection from home routers Philip Loenneker
Re: V6 still not supported Mark Delany
Re: V6 still not supported Mark Delany
RE: V6 still not supported Pascal Thubert (pthubert) via NANOG
A straightforward transition plan (was: Re: V6 still not supported) John Curran
Re: ISP data collection from home routers Lady Benjamin Cannon of Glencoe, ASCE
Re: ISP data collection from home routers Josh Luthman
Re: ISP data collection from home routers Lady Benjamin Cannon of Glencoe, ASCE
Re: ISP data collection from home routers Josh Luthman
Re: ISP data collection from home routers Giovane C. M. Moura via NANOG
Re: Bufferbloat and the pandemic was: V6 still not supported Livingood, Jason via NANOG
Re: ISP data collection from home routers Joe Greco
Re: ISP data collection from home routers Christopher Morrow
Re: ISP data collection from home routers Anne Mitchell
Re: ISP data collection from home routers Jay Hennigan
OVH data center fire (2021) report Sean Donelan
Re: ISP data collection from home routers Tom Beecher
Re: ISP data collection from home routers Christopher Morrow
Re: V6 still not supported Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: V6 still not supported Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: V6 still not supported Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: V6 still not supported Michael Thomas
Re: V6 still not supported Michael Thomas
Re: V6 still not supported Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: V6 still not supported Michael Thomas
Re: V6 still not supported Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: V6 still not supported Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: V6 still not supported Joe Maimon
Re: V6 still not supported Joe Maimon
Re: V6 still not supported Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: V6 still not supported John Gilmore
AS21299 - 46.42.196.0/24 ASN prepending 255 times Erik Sundberg
WP: Russian military behind hack of satellite communication devices Sean Donelan
Re: V6 still not supported Joe Maimon
Re: V6 still not supported James R Cutler
Re: AS21299 - 46.42.196.0/24 ASN prepending 255 times surfer
Re: AS21299 - 46.42.196.0/24 ASN prepending 255 times Erik Sundberg
Re: V6 still not supported Pascal Thubert (pthubert) via NANOG

Friday, 25 March

Re: DMARC ViolationAS21299 - 46.42.196.0/24 ASN prepending 255 times Paschal Masha
Re: DMARC ViolationAS21299 - 46.42.196.0/24 ASN prepending 255 times Bjørn Mork
Cogent pulled out of Russia based on risk analysis Lady Benjamin Cannon of Glencoe, ASCE
Re: Cogent pulled out of Russia based on risk analysis Mike Hammett
Re: Cogent pulled out of Russia based on risk analysis Rubens Kuhl
Re: Cogent pulled out of Russia based on risk analysis Lady Benjamin Cannon of Glencoe
Re: V6 still not supported Jared Brown
MAP-T (was: Re: V6 still not supported) Jared Brown
Re: IPv6 "bloat" history William Allen Simpson
Re: Cogent pulled out of Russia based on risk analysis Martin Hannigan
IPvB translation header William Allen Simpson
Re: ISP data collection from home routers Francis Booth via NANOG
Re: ISP data collection from home routers Christian David
Re: ISP data collection from home routers Joel Busch
Re: ISP data collection from home routers Mu
Re: ISP data collection from home routers Kord Martin
Re: V6 still not supported Matthew Craig
RE: MAP-T (was: Re: V6 still not supported) Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG
IPvB performance header William Allen Simpson
Re: ISP data collection from home routers PJ Capelli via NANOG
Re: ISP data collection from home routers PJ Capelli via NANOG
Re: IPv6 "bloat" history William Allen Simpson
Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Abraham Y. Chen
Re: DMARC ViolationAS21299 - 46.42.196.0/24 ASN prepending 255 times Joe Provo
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Christopher Morrow
Weekly Global IPv4 Routing Table Report Routing Table Analysis Role Account
Re: WP: Russian military behind hack of satellite communication devices Eric Kuhnke
Re: A straightforward transition plan (was: Re: V6 still not supported) John Curran
Re: WP: Russian military behind hack of satellite communication devices Sean Donelan
Re: V6 still not supported Pascal Thubert (pthubert) via NANOG
Re: ISP data collection from home routers Michael Thomas
Re: V6 still not supported Doug McIntyre
Re: ISP data collection from home routers Mike Hammett
Re: DMARC ViolationAS21299 - 46.42.196.0/24 ASN prepending 255 times Baldur Norddahl
Re: ISP data collection from home routers Mike Hammett
Re: MAP-T (was: Re: V6 still not supported) JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG
Re: DMARC ViolationAS21299 - 46.42.196.0/24 ASN prepending 255 times Tom Beecher
Re: ISP data collection from home routers Tom Beecher
Re: ISP data collection from home routers Mike Hammett
RE: DMARC ViolationAS21299 - 46.42.196.0/24 ASN prepending 255 times Adam Thompson
RE: MAP-T (was: Re: V6 still not supported) Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG
Re: DMARC ViolationAS21299 - 46.42.196.0/24 ASN prepending 255 times Brian Knight via NANOG
Re: ISP data collection from home routers Eric Kuhnke
TIMELY - IMPORTANT NOTICE - Retirement of ARIN Non-Authenticated IRR scheduled for 4 April 2022 John Curran
Re: V6 still not supported Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: DMARC ViolationAS21299 - 46.42.196.0/24 ASN prepending 255 times Matthew Petach
Re: V6 still not supported Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: DMARC ViolationAS21299 - 46.42.196.0/24 ASN prepending 255 times Amir Herzberg
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Abraham Y. Chen
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Abraham Y. Chen
Re: V6 still not supported R: 202203232156.AYC Abraham Y. Chen
Re: V6 still not supported Re: 202203231017.AYC Abraham Y. Chen
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: DMARC ViolationAS21299 - 46.42.196.0/24 ASN prepending 255 times Matthew Petach

Saturday, 26 March

Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Abraham Y. Chen
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Paul Rolland
v6ops-transition-comparison (was: Re: MAP-T (was: Re: V6 still not supported)) John Curran
Re: DMARC ViolationAS21299 - 46.42.196.0/24 ASN prepending 255 times Tom Beecher
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Tom Beecher
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Re: 20220326125.AYC Abraham Y. Chen
Re: MAP-T (was: Re: V6 still not supported) John Levine
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Re: 20220326125.AYC Tom Beecher
Re: MAP-T (was: Re: V6 still not supported) JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Re: 202203261748.AYC Abraham Y. Chen
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Abraham Y. Chen
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Re: 202203261748.AYC Randy Carpenter
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Joe Greco
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Masataka Ohta
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported james.cutler () consultant com
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported John Gilmore
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Jay Hennigan
Re: V6 still not supported Joe Maimon
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Joe Maimon
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Abraham Y. Chen
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Joe Maimon
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Joe Maimon

Sunday, 27 March

Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Masataka Ohta
Re: MAP-T Bjørn Mork
Re: MAP-T Nick Hilliard
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Brandon Butterworth
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Christian de Larrinaga via NANOG
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Justin Streiner
Re: DMARC ViolationAS21299 - 46.42.196.0/24 ASN prepending 255 times Jon Lewis
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Abraham Y. Chen
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported james.cutler () consultant com
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported John Levine
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Christopher Morrow
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Re: 202203261748.AYC Abraham Y. Chen
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Re: 202203261748.AYC Fred Baker
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Re: 202203261748.AYC Fred Baker
Re: DMARC ViolationAS21299 - 46.42.196.0/24 ASN prepending 255 times Baldur Norddahl
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Abraham Y. Chen
Would someone from Sling.com and Netflix contact me off-list Anthony Leto

Monday, 28 March

Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported John Gilmore
Routes to twitter via 8359 8359 8342 Drew Weaver
Re: Routes to twitter via 8359 8359 8342 Job Snijders via NANOG
Re: Routes to twitter via 8359 8359 8342 Peter Potvin via NANOG
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Masataka Ohta
Re: A straightforward transition plan (was: Re: V6 still not supported) Philip Homburg
Re: V6 still not supported Philip Homburg
Re: MAP-T (was: Re: V6 still not supported) Rajiv Asati (rajiva) via NANOG
Re: A straightforward transition plan (was: Re: V6 still not supported) Philip Homburg
Re: V6 still not supported Philip Homburg
Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: ISP data collection from home routers Michael Froomkin - U . Miami School of Law
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Joshua Mallad
Re: A straightforward transition plan (was: Re: V6 still not supported) JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG
Re: A straightforward transition plan (was: Re: V6 still not supported) Ca By
Re: IPv6 "bloat" history Masataka Ohta
Re: V6 still not supported Masataka Ohta
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Masataka Ohta
Re: A straightforward transition plan (was: Re: V6 still not supported) Joe Maimon
RE: V6 still not supported Pascal Thubert (pthubert) via NANOG
RE: V6 still not supported Ryland Kremeier
Re: IPv6 "bloat" history Pascal Thubert (pthubert) via NANOG
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Owen DeLong via NANOG

Tuesday, 29 March

Re: IPv6 "bloat" history Masataka Ohta
RE: IPv6 "bloat" history Pascal Thubert (pthubert) via NANOG
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Tom Beecher
Budget news: Proposed Puerto Rico FEMA distribution center (warehouse) Sean Donelan
PoE, Comcast Modems, and Service Outages Aaron de Bruyn via NANOG
Re: PoE, Comcast Modems, and Service Outages Joe Greco
Re: PoE, Comcast Modems, and Service Outages Josh Luthman
Re: PoE, Comcast Modems, and Service Outages Brie
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: PoE, Comcast Modems, and Service Outages Joe Greco
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Re: 20220326125.AYC Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: SentryPeer: A distributed peer to peer list of bad IP addresses and phone numbers collected via a SIP Honeypot Gavin Henry
Re: PoE, Comcast Modems, and Service Outages Josh Luthman
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: PoE, Comcast Modems, and Service Outages Joe Greco
Re: PoE, Comcast Modems, and Service Outages Aaron de Bruyn via NANOG
Re: PoE, Comcast Modems, and Service Outages Aaron C. de Bruyn via NANOG
Re: PoE, Comcast Modems, and Service Outages Jay Hennigan
Re: PoE, Comcast Modems, and Service Outages Aaron C. de Bruyn via NANOG
Re: PoE, Comcast Modems, and Service Outages Kord Martin
Re: PoE, Comcast Modems, and Service Outages Niels Bakker
Re: PoE, Comcast Modems, and Service Outages Matt Ertle
IPv6 Only - was Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Jacques Latour
Re: IPv6 Only - was Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC jim deleskie
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: PoE, Comcast Modems, and Service Outages Brie
Re: PoE, Comcast Modems, and Service Outages Blake Hudson
Re: PoE, Comcast Modems, and Service Outages Aaron de Bruyn via NANOG
Internet Storm Center says Russia hijacking Twitter's BGP Jay R. Ashworth
Re: PoE, Comcast Modems, and Service Outages Blake Hudson
Re: PoE, Comcast Modems, and Service Outages Sabri Berisha
Re: PoE, Comcast Modems, and Service Outages Randy Bush
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Masataka Ohta
RE: DMARC ViolationAS21299 - 46.42.196.0/24 ASN prepending 255 times Adam Thompson

Wednesday, 30 March

Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported John Gilmore
ICANN Survey on DNS Suffix Usage and New gTLD Delegation Casey Deccio
A few questions regarding about RPKI/invalids Drew Weaver
Re: A few questions regarding about RPKI/invalids Andrey Kostin
Re: A few questions regarding about RPKI/invalids Jon Lewis
Re: A few questions regarding about RPKI/invalids Job Snijders via NANOG
Re: V6 still not supported Jared Brown
Re: V6 still not supported Jared Brown
CGNAT scaling cost (was Re: V6 still not supported) Jared Brown
Re: A few questions regarding about RPKI/invalids Nimrod Levy
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Joe Maimon
Re: V6 still not supported Randy Carpenter
RE: CGNAT scaling cost (was Re: V6 still not supported) Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG
Re: V6 still not supported Jared Brown
Re: V6 still not supported Randy Carpenter
Re: PoE, Comcast Modems, and Service Outages Grant Taylor via NANOG
Re: PoE, Comcast Modems, and Service Outages Grant Taylor via NANOG
Re: PoE, Comcast Modems, and Service Outages Kord Martin
Re: V6 still not supported Jared Brown
Re: RE: CGNAT scaling cost (was V6 still not supported) Jared Brown
Re: V6 still not supported John Kristoff
Re: V6 still not supported Christopher Morrow
Re: PoE, Comcast Modems, and Service Outages Livingood, Jason via NANOG
Re: PoE, Comcast Modems, and Service Outages Livingood, Jason via NANOG
Re: PoE, Comcast Modems, and Service Outages Jay Hennigan
RE: RE: CGNAT scaling cost (was V6 still not supported) Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG
Re: PoE, Comcast Modems, and Service Outages Aaron de Bruyn via NANOG
Re: PoE, Comcast Modems, and Service Outages Jay Hennigan
Re: PoE, Comcast Modems, and Service Outages Joe Greco
Re: V6 still not supported JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG
Re: V6 still not supported Jared Brown
ATT DNS contact nanog
Sling.com and/or Dish Network Contact. Anthony Leto
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Tom Beecher
Re: V6 still not supported Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported John Kristoff
Re: IPv6 Only - was Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Mark Andrews
Re: A straightforward transition plan (was: Re: V6 still not supported) Mark Andrews
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Joe Maimon
Re: CGNAT scaling cost (was Re: V6 still not supported) Masataka Ohta

Thursday, 31 March

RE: A straightforward transition plan (was: Re: V6 still not supported) Pascal Thubert (pthubert) via NANOG
RE: CGNAT scaling cost (was Re: V6 still not supported) Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG
Re: IPv6 "bloat" history William Allen Simpson
Re: IPv6 "bloat" history William Allen Simpson
RE: IPv6 "bloat" history Pascal Thubert (pthubert) via NANOG
RE: IPv6 "bloat" history Pascal Thubert (pthubert) via NANOG
Re: IPv6 Only Jacques Latour
RE: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG
RE: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Pascal Thubert (pthubert) via NANOG
Opinions on Arista for BGP? David Hubbard
Re: PoE, Comcast Modems, and Service OutagesPyle Abraham Y. Chen
Re: IPv6 "bloat" history Masataka Ohta
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Abraham Y. Chen
Cogent ... Laura Smith via NANOG
Re: Cogent ... Joe Greco
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Masataka Ohta
Re: Cogent ... David Hubbard
Re: Cogent ... Aaron Wendel
Re: Cogent ... Paul Timmins
Re: MAP-T (was: Re: V6 still not supported) Ben Plimpton
RE: EXTERNAL: Re: Cogent ... Ray Orsini via NANOG
Re: Cogent ... Laura Smith via NANOG
Re: PoE, Comcast Modems, and Service OutagesPyle Grant Taylor via NANOG
RE: A few questions regarding about RPKI/invalids Drew Weaver
Re: Cogent ... Matthew Petach
Re: IPv6 Only Matthew Petach
NANOG 85 Registration is now OPEN! + VIDEO | Internet Innovators Nanog News
Re: IPv6 Only - was Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: IPv6 Only Carsten Bormann
Re: V6 still not supported Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: V6 still not supported Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: IPv6 Only Mark Andrews
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: DMARC ViolationAS21299 - 46.42.196.0/24 ASN prepending 255 times Joe Maimon
What's a "normal" ratio of web sites to IP addresses... Bill Woodcock
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Matthew Petach
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Joe Maimon
Re: DMARC ViolationAS21299 - 46.42.196.0/24 ASN prepending 255 times Matthew Petach
Re: IPv6 Only - was Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Andras Toth
Re: DMARC ViolationAS21299 - 46.42.196.0/24 ASN prepending 255 times Joe Maimon
Re: What's a "normal" ratio of web sites to IP addresses... David Hubbard
Re: What's a "normal" ratio of web sites to IP addresses... Bill Woodcock
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: IPv6 Only - was Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: What's a "normal" ratio of web sites to IP addresses... Owen DeLong via NANOG
End of Mariupol's Internet Sean Donelan
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Joe Maimon
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Masataka Ohta
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Owen DeLong via NANOG
RE: IPv6 "bloat" history Pascal Thubert (pthubert) via NANOG