nanog mailing list archives
Re: V6 still not supported
From: Tom Hill <tom () ninjabadger net>
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2022 22:56:25 +0000
Loose translation: On 09/03/2022 22:46, Andy Ringsmuth wrote:
“We’re working on it.” they say.
"There is only 1.5 of us; we're overworked and underpaid and this allows us to postpone this workstream for a while."
“We’re waiting for wider adoption.” they say.
"Not enough of you are complaining about the lack of IPv6, but we're still pushing 8.8.8.8 as our resolver so we have to fix that first."
“We’re waiting for our upstream to support it.” they say (and HE is their upstream).
"Our BGP edge router is a 7600 pieced together from several eBay purchases, and might blow up if we add the IPv6 DFZ."
The first one is all-too-common where I live, too. Fake it until you make it is rife. Getting fibre into the ground - past as many homes as possible - is the sole priority.
-- Tom
Current thread:
- Re: V6 still not supported, (continued)
- Re: V6 still not supported Josh Luthman (Mar 09)
- Re: V6 still not supported Michael Thomas (Mar 09)
- Re: V6 still not supported Josh Luthman (Mar 09)
- Re: V6 still not supported Michael Thomas (Mar 09)
- RE: V6 still not supported Tony Wicks (Mar 09)
- Re: V6 still not supported Tom Beecher (Mar 09)
- Re: V6 still not supported Josh Luthman (Mar 10)
- Re: V6 still not supported Tim Howe (Mar 09)
- Re: V6 still not supported Andy Ringsmuth (Mar 09)
- Re: V6 still not supported Jay Hennigan (Mar 09)
- Re: V6 still not supported Tom Hill (Mar 09)
- RE: V6 still not supported netElastic Systems (Mar 10)
- Re: V6 still not supported Josh Luthman (Mar 10)
- Re: V6 still not supported Bryan Fields (Mar 10)
- Re: V6 still not supported Ca By (Mar 10)
- Re: V6 still not supported Christopher Morrow (Mar 10)
- Re: V6 still not supported Gary E. Miller (Mar 09)
- Re: V6 still not supported Josh Luthman (Mar 10)
- Re: V6 still not supported Tom Beecher (Mar 10)
- Re: V6 still not supported Josh Luthman (Mar 10)
- Re: V6 still not supported Robert L Mathews (Mar 10)