nanog mailing list archives
Re: V6 still not supported
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 13:47:12 -0400
On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 1:21 PM John Kristoff <jtk () dataplane org> wrote:
On Wed, 30 Mar 2022 18:36:24 +0200 Jared Brown <nanog-isp () mail com> wrote:IPv4 address blocks have a fixed one-time cost, not an ongoing $X/month cost.From an RIR perhaps, but when demand changes for your available pool, what happens downstream? When you rent servers from providers, unless you bring your own address space, the invoice includes the cost of one or more IPv4 addresses, often with the option to rent additional IPv4 addresses on a per month basis. Just this week I received notice of a $2/VM price increase from one provider. They stated "demand for IP address has caused a shortage and increased prices".
also, you know.. it's a monetizable asset now, so ... why not just charge rent? :) I mean, in like 12 months you can pay for 2 ips if you charge 2$/month / ip.
Current thread:
- Re: V6 still not supported, (continued)
- Re: V6 still not supported Jared Brown (Mar 25)
- Re: V6 still not supported Doug McIntyre (Mar 25)
- Re: V6 still not supported Owen DeLong via NANOG (Mar 25)
- Re: V6 still not supported Jared Brown (Mar 30)
- Re: V6 still not supported Randy Carpenter (Mar 30)
- Re: V6 still not supported Jared Brown (Mar 30)
- Re: V6 still not supported Randy Carpenter (Mar 30)
- Re: V6 still not supported Jared Brown (Mar 30)
- Re: V6 still not supported Owen DeLong via NANOG (Mar 31)
- Re: V6 still not supported John Kristoff (Mar 30)
- Re: V6 still not supported Christopher Morrow (Mar 30)
- Re: V6 still not supported Jared Brown (Mar 25)
- Re: V6 still not supported JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Mar 30)
- Re: V6 still not supported Owen DeLong via NANOG (Mar 31)