nanog mailing list archives
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Re: 20220326125.AYC
From: Tom Beecher <beecher () beecher cc>
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2022 14:38:54 -0400
It was quite frustrating since we did not have the background in networking software
You clearly still do not, if you sincerely believe that commenting out a single function in every vendor software implementation is all that it would take. No need to respond ; I will be filtering all future messages from you to /dev/null . Good luck with your efforts. On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 12:42 PM Abraham Y. Chen <aychen () avinta com> wrote:
Hi, Paul: 1) " ... may be in fact: /writing/* and */deploying/* the code ... ": Having no idea why and how the 240/4 netblock became so mysteriously kept away from being used while the IPv4 was officially already on its way to "Sun Set", we started the conventional approach as you stated. It was quite frustrating since we did not have the background in networking software. One day, we came across a short program code fragment that did the function of *disabling* 240/4 addressed IP packets. It is the "there exists an example" moment for us, like proofing a mathematics theorem. After all, there was no magic separating 240/4 from the rest of the IPv4 address pool to start with. It cleared our mind about this particular task. Now, we only cite this reference to challenge those software engineers who may state that using the 240/4 in their code is a lot more involved. .... Q.E.D. 😉 Regards, Abe (2022-03-26 12:37 EDT) On 2022-03-26 09:52, Paul Rolland wrote: Hello, On Sat, 26 Mar 2022 09:35:30 -0400 "Abraham Y. Chen" <aychen () avinta com> <aychen () avinta com> wrote: touching the hardware, by implementing the EzIP technique (*/disabling/* the program code that has been */disabling/* the use of the 240/4 netblock), an existing CG-NAT module becomes a RAN! As to universal Have you ever considered that this may be in fact: */writing/* and */deploying/* the code that will allow the use of 240/4 the way you expect Paul <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient&utm_term=icon> Virus-free. www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient&utm_term=link> <#m_-7532339818749475379_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
Current thread:
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported, (continued)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Joe Maimon (Mar 26)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Christopher Morrow (Mar 27)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported John Gilmore (Mar 28)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Joshua Mallad (Mar 28)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Masataka Ohta (Mar 28)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Tom Beecher (Mar 29)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported John Gilmore (Mar 30)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported John Kristoff (Mar 30)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Owen DeLong via NANOG (Mar 29)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Re: 20220326125.AYC Abraham Y. Chen (Mar 26)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Re: 20220326125.AYC Tom Beecher (Mar 26)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Re: 20220326125.AYC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Mar 29)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Joe Maimon (Mar 26)
- Message not available
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Abraham Y. Chen (Mar 26)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Justin Streiner (Mar 27)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Abraham Y. Chen (Mar 27)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Mar 29)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Joe Maimon (Mar 30)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Tom Beecher (Mar 30)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Joe Maimon (Mar 30)
- RE: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (Mar 31)