nanog mailing list archives
Re: Not Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock
From: Niels Bakker <niels=nanog () bakker net>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2022 00:45:28 +0100
* bzs () theworld com (bzs () theworld com) [Mon 14 Mar 2022, 00:31 CET]:
Personally I'd rather hear from the RIRs regarding the value or not of making more IPv4 space such as 240/4 available. They're on the front lines of this.
You've got your policy development process diagram upside down. The community decides what the RIRs implement. They're not in touch with merchant silicon manufacturers.
-- Niels.
Current thread:
- Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock, (continued)
- Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock William Herrin (Mar 13)
- Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock Christopher Morrow (Mar 13)
- Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock Abraham Y. Chen (Mar 11)
- Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock William Herrin (Mar 11)
- Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock Abraham Y. Chen (Mar 12)
- Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock Saku Ytti (Mar 13)
- Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock Joe Maimon (Mar 13)
- Re: Not Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock John Levine (Mar 13)
- Re: Not Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock Randy Bush (Mar 13)
- Re: Not Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock bzs (Mar 13)
- Re: Not Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock Niels Bakker (Mar 13)
- Re: Not Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock bzs (Mar 14)
- Not Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock Sylvain Baya (Mar 15)
- Re: Not Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock Owen DeLong via NANOG (Mar 15)
- Re: Not Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock Mark Andrews (Mar 15)
- Re: Not Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock Owen DeLong via NANOG (Mar 16)
- Re: Not Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock Mark Andrews (Mar 16)
- Re: Not Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock bzs (Mar 15)
- Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock Fred Baker (Mar 13)