Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported

[Owen DeLong via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>]

> On Mar 31, 2022, at 20:51, Masataka Ohta <mohta () necom830 hpcl titech ac jp> wrote:
>
> Owen DeLong wrote:
>
> > It still suffers from a certain amount of opacity across administrative domains.
>
> So, if an IPv6 prefix is assigned to an apartment building and
> the building has no logging mechanism on how addresses are used
> within the building, the problem of audit trail opacity is
> suffered.
>
> Thank you very much to have proven IPv6 useless.
>
>                                               Masataka Ohta


No, the problem of address correlation to end user may still exist, but the address
Is transparent. The address in log files at the apartment complex matches the address
In log files at intervening networks matches the address in log files at the victim network.

Obviously, if the apartment complex has no log files, then yes, it remains relatively useless
In your one contrived corner case… That not being the more general and widely deployed
Case, I think that calling that proof that IPv6 is worthless proves more about your inane
Bias than anything else.

Owen