nanog mailing list archives
Re: V6 still not supported
From: Joe Maimon <jmaimon () jmaimon com>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2022 16:06:03 -0400
Michael Thomas wrote:
On 3/23/22 11:53 AM, Joe Maimon wrote:IETF can't force people to adopt things, film at 11. They certainly can't control people's saltiness from something that happened 30 years ago. IPv6 is manifestly deployable for operators that want to. If others don't want to deploy it in the face of the predictable address crunch, that's on the operators and not anybody else. Vendors will build patches and hacks and other abominations if somebody is willing to pay for it. If you like CGN, by all means deploy it from a vendor standpoint. If you don't like CGN either then, well, you're sort of screwed. Going back and relitigating ipng is not ever going to happen.Michael Thomas wrote:Mike
Which is why the IETF should not engineer things under the assumption that they can.
Which is why the IETF should not be citing IPv6 as cause to deny efforts on IPv4.
Because as you say, at this point, even if you dont like CGN, the internet is sort of screwed.
And the reasons that IPv6 is not deployed everywhere it could or even should be are myriad. Perhaps unpredictable. That reasons would abound was predictable.
Network A deploying IPv6 does not do nearly as much to help A as it does when B-Z do, which is the core problem of IPv6 transition. You can understand then that even in the face of shortage IPv6 is only one of the options on the table at network A for short term alleviation. And usually not even the one with most bang per buck. Those who can choose D) all of the above, the rest prioritize based on resources and various locally defined assessments and analysis. Also unpredictable, but predictable that they would exist.
Bygones are bygones, but not if the behavior persists.Yes, I understand referring to the IETF as an individual entity is grossly oversimplifying.
Joe
Current thread:
- Re: V6 still not supported, (continued)
- Re: V6 still not supported Michael Thomas (Mar 22)
- Re: V6 still not supported Christopher Morrow (Mar 22)
- Re: V6 still not supported Michael Thomas (Mar 22)
- Re: V6 still not supported George Michaelson (Mar 22)
- Re: V6 still not supported Joe Maimon (Mar 22)
- Re: V6 still not supported Michael Thomas (Mar 23)
- Re: V6 still not supported Joe Maimon (Mar 23)
- Re: V6 still not supported Michael Thomas (Mar 23)
- Re: V6 still not supported Joe Maimon (Mar 23)
- Re: V6 still not supported Michael Thomas (Mar 23)
- Re: V6 still not supported Joe Maimon (Mar 23)
- Re: V6 still not supported Owen DeLong via NANOG (Mar 23)
- Re: V6 still not supported Mark Delany (Mar 24)
- RE: V6 still not supported Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (Mar 24)
- Re: V6 still not supported Mark Delany (Mar 24)
- Re: V6 still not supported Owen DeLong via NANOG (Mar 24)
- Re: V6 still not supported Michael Thomas (Mar 24)
- Re: V6 still not supported Owen DeLong via NANOG (Mar 24)
- Re: V6 still not supported Michael Thomas (Mar 24)
- Re: V6 still not supported Owen DeLong via NANOG (Mar 24)
- Re: V6 still not supported Joe Maimon (Mar 24)