nanog mailing list archives

Re: Re udp port overload on ipv4 (was Re: V6 still not supported)

From: William Herrin <bill () herrin us>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 11:56:50 -0800

On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 11:43 AM Dave Taht <dave.taht () gmail com> wrote:

I am deeply concerned by the onrushing move to udp for QUIC, with udp
the former province of voip, gaming, request/response and
videoconferencing traffic.


Hi Dave,

Since QUIC is without value unless it works with widely deployed NAT
there's not exactly an alternative. Glad to see that they, at least,
have learned from the IPv6 deployment debacle.

Regards,
Bill Herrin


-- 
William Herrin
bill () herrin us
https://bill.herrin.us/

Current thread:

Re: CC: s to Non List Members (was Re: 202203080924.AYC Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock), (continued)
- - - Re: CC: s to Non List Members (was Re: 202203080924.AYC Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock) Seth David Schoen (Mar 08)
    - Re: CC: s to Non List Members (was Re: 202203080924.AYC Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock) John Gilmore (Mar 09)
    - Re: CC: s to Non List Members (was Re: 202203080924.AYC Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock) Tom Beecher (Mar 09)
    - Re: CC: s to Non List Members (was Re: 202203080924.AYC Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock) Tim Howe (Mar 09)
    - V6 still not supported (was Re: CC: s to Non List Members (was Re: 202203080924.AYC Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock)) David Conrad (Mar 09)
    - Re: V6 still not supported (was Re: CC: s to Non List Members (was Re: 202203080924.AYC Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock)) Joe Greco (Mar 09)
    - Re: V6 still not supported (was Re: CC: s to Non List Members (was Re: 202203080924.AYC Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock)) Saku Ytti (Mar 09)
    - Re: V6 still not supported (was Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock)) Masataka Ohta (Mar 10)
    - Re: V6 still not supported (was Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock)) Matthew Walster (Mar 10)
    - Re udp port overload on ipv4 (was Re: V6 still not supported) Dave Taht (Mar 10)
    - Re: Re udp port overload on ipv4 (was Re: V6 still not supported) William Herrin (Mar 10)
    - Re: Re udp port overload on ipv4 (was Re: V6 still not supported) Matthew Walster (Mar 10)
    - Re: Re udp port overload on ipv4 (was Re: V6 still not supported) Grzegorz Janoszka (Mar 10)
    - Re: V6 still not supported (was Re: CC: s to Non List Members (was Re: 202203080924.AYC Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock)) Joe Greco (Mar 10)
    - Re: V6 still not supported (was Re: CC: s to Non List Members (was Re: 202203080924.AYC Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock)) Saku Ytti (Mar 10)
    - Re: V6 still not supported (was Re: CC: s to Non List Members (was Re: 202203080924.AYC Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock)) Ca By (Mar 10)
    - Re: V6 still not supported (was Re: CC: s to Non List Members (was Re: 202203080924.AYC Re: 202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock)) Tom Beecher (Mar 10)
    - Re: V6 still not supported Grant Taylor via NANOG (Mar 09)
    - Re: V6 still not supported Jay Hennigan (Mar 09)
    - Re: V6 still not supported Grant Taylor via NANOG (Mar 09)
    - Re: V6 still not supported Josh Luthman (Mar 09)

(Thread continues...)