Re: V6 still not supported

[Owen DeLong via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>]

> On Mar 24, 2022, at 14:46 , Michael Thomas <mike () mtcc com> wrote:
>
>
> On 3/24/22 1:59 PM, Owen DeLong via NANOG wrote:
> > Home users aren’t the long tail here. Enterprise is the long tail here. Android phones are,
> > indeed, part of the enterprise problem, but not the biggest part.
> >
> > If this were a purely technical problem, we’d have been done more than a decade ago. The
> > problem is a lack of corporate “round tuits” which for each enterprise are in limited supply and
> > usually go to things that either reduce costs or increase revenue.
> So long as they have public facing v6 servers is there really a problem? Sure you're not going to get to 100% 
> deployment, but nothing is going to do that in any of our lifetimes. The object should be to not have to deploy 
> tortured hacks like CGNAT. That is what success is IMO, and we don't from a technical standpoint.
>
> Mike

Yes… We need them to have v6 deployed to their clients so that content providers can start turning off v4 where it’s 
costing them money to support it.

Owen