nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cogent ...
From: Joe Greco <jgreco () ns sol net>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 12:18:25 -0500
On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 03:38:15PM +0000, Laura Smith via NANOG wrote:
However, perhaps someone would care to elaborate (either on or off- list) what the deal is with the requirement to sign NDAs with Cogent before they'll discuss things like why they still charge for BGP, or indeed any other technical or pricing matters. Seems weird ?!?
Because they know that the sillier bits will be poked fun at on NANOG if they allow them to be disclosed? Because if you can't talk about your pricing, then they aren't as likely to be facing customers who know how cheap it was sold to some other party? ... JG -- Joe Greco - sol.net Network Services - Milwaukee, WI - http://www.sol.net "The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that 'my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.'"-Asimov
Current thread:
- Cogent ... Laura Smith via NANOG (Mar 31)
- Re: Cogent ... Joe Greco (Mar 31)
- Re: Cogent ... Laura Smith via NANOG (Mar 31)
- Re: Cogent ... David Hubbard (Mar 31)
- Re: Cogent ... Aaron Wendel (Mar 31)
- Re: Cogent ... Paul Timmins (Mar 31)
- RE: EXTERNAL: Re: Cogent ... Ray Orsini via NANOG (Mar 31)
- Re: Cogent ... Matthew Petach (Mar 31)
- Re: Cogent ... Joe Greco (Mar 31)