nanog mailing list archives
RE: V6 still not supported
From: "Pascal Thubert \(pthubert\) via NANOG" <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 16:05:16 +0000
Complaining is fun and healthy. But I was unclear, not asking about v4 vs. v6, but about caring for / contributing to evolution of network protocols, or not. Some evolution has happened in the IPv6 world, more could happen, so it gets better. Or throw the baby? Keep safe; Pascal
-----Original Message----- From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com> Sent: mardi 22 mars 2022 16:38 To: Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthubert () cisco com> Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog () nanog org> Subject: Re: V6 still not supportedWhich side are you on?hint: this is an operators' list. we are forced to be on all 'sides'. this pain gives us the privilege of whining a lot. randy
Current thread:
- V6 still not supported Daniel Karrenberg (Mar 22)
- RE: V6 still not supported Pascal Thubert (pthubert) via NANOG (Mar 22)
- Re: V6 still not supported Randy Bush (Mar 22)
- RE: V6 still not supported Pascal Thubert (pthubert) via NANOG (Mar 22)
- Re: V6 still not supported Randy Bush (Mar 22)
- Re: V6 still not supported Randy Bush (Mar 22)
- Re: V6 still not supported Joe Maimon (Mar 22)
- Re: V6 still not supported bzs (Mar 22)
- Re: V6 still not supported Joe Maimon (Mar 22)
- RE: V6 still not supported Pascal Thubert (pthubert) via NANOG (Mar 22)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: V6 still not supported james.cutler () consultant com (Mar 23)
- Bufferbloat and the pandemic was: V6 still not supported Michael Thomas (Mar 23)
- Re: Bufferbloat and the pandemic was: V6 still not supported John Levine (Mar 23)
- Re: Bufferbloat and the pandemic was: V6 still not supported Michael Thomas (Mar 23)
- Re: Bufferbloat and the pandemic was: V6 still not supported Livingood, Jason via NANOG (Mar 24)
- Bufferbloat and the pandemic was: V6 still not supported Michael Thomas (Mar 23)
- Re: V6 still not supported Joe Maimon (Mar 23)