Re: V6 still not supported (was Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock))

[Masataka Ohta <mohta () necom830 hpcl titech ac jp>]

Saku Ytti wrote:

> Same. And if we don't voluntarily agree to do something to it, it'll
> be the same in 2042, we fucked up and those who come after us pay the
> price of the insane amount of work and cost dual stack causes.

Indeed, we don't need IPv6 at all at least for the next 20 years,
which is long enough to have 32bit port length for TCP and UDP to
make NAT save address space more efficiently.

                                                Masataka Ohta