nanog: by date

589 messages starting Sep 30 97 and ending Oct 31 97
Date index | Thread index | Author index

Tuesday, 30 September

Re: Responsible Network Management Guidelines Philip Macdonald
Re: *scream* Cannot contact AT&T WorldNet NOC Geoff Lisk

Wednesday, 01 October

Worldcomm/UUNet makes a bid for MCI and BROOKS Fiber Rodney Joffe
Re: Worldcomm/UUNet makes a bid for MCI and BROOKS Fiber Mark Goodge
Re: Worldcomm/UUNet makes a bid for MCI and BROOKS Fiber Chris A. Icide
RE: Worldcomm/UUNet makes a bid for MCI and BROOKS Fiber George J. Broadfoot III
Re: IE4 goes live; Imminent Death of the Net predicted Jay R. Ashworth
Re: Responsible Network Management Guidelines Jay R. Ashworth
Re: Worldcomm/UUNet makes a bid for MCI and BROOKS Fiber Steve Mansfield
Re: Worldcomm/UUNet makes a bid for MCI and BROOKS Fiber Jesse M. Caulfield
Re: *scream* Cannot contact AT&T WorldNet NOC Eric Wieling
Netcom Contact ? Jim Browne
Re: Worldcomm/UUNet makes a bid for MCI and BROOKS Fiber Kent W. England
Re: Netcom Contact ? Kit Knox
Re: Worldcomm/UUNet makes a bid for MCI and BROOKS Fiber Joel Sadler - Indentured Servant
Re: Netcom Contact ? Mike
Re: Worldcomm/UUNet makes a bid for MCI and BROOKS Fiber Michael Dillon
Re: Netcom Contact ? Raymond Wong

Thursday, 02 October

AGIS/Cyberpromo Article Mark E Larson
Re: [NOOP] 24x7 NOC.. Jared Mauch
Re: [NOOP] 24x7 NOC.. J.D. Falk
Re: [NOOP] 24x7 NOC.. Aaron
Re: [NOOP] 24x7 NOC.. Paul Ferguson
Re: [NOOP] 24x7 NOC.. Perry E. Metzger
Re: [NOOP] 24x7 NOC.. J.D. Falk
Re: [NOOP] 24x7 NOC.. Kent W. England
Results of North American NOC contact information verification Sean Donelan
Re: [NOOP] 24x7 NOC.. Steve Miller
Re: [NOOP] 24x7 NOC.. J.D. Falk
Re: [NOOP] 24x7 NOC.. Scott Portmaster List
[NOOP] 24x7 NOC.. Jamie Rishaw

Friday, 03 October

Re: [NOOP] 24x7 NOC.. Barry Caplin
Re: [NOOP] 24x7 NOC.. Robert Perfetti
Re: [NOOP] 24x7 NOC.. Doug McClure
Re: [NOOP] 24x7 NOC.. Selina F. Priestley
Re: [NOOP] 24x7 NOC.. Tim Salo
Re: [NOOP] 24x7 NOC.. David Lesher
Re: [techteam] Re: [NOOP] 24x7 NOC.. Rostand Reymund Lim Abear
Re: [NOOP] 24x7 NOC.. Debra Kelly
Re: [NOOP] 24x7 NOC.. (fwd) Matthew R. Meyer
The Cidr Report Tony Bates
Re: The Cidr Report Philip J. Nesser II
971003:1520: Fiber-cut in Michigan Chris Layne
Re: Results of North American NOC contact information verification Sean Donelan
The List CobraNet's Head Administrator

Saturday, 04 October

INTERNIC charging for address space? Michael Gibson
Re: INTERNIC charging for address space? bmanning
Re: INTERNIC charging for address space? Alec H. Peterson

Sunday, 05 October

Re: The List Susan R. Harris
Re: INTERNIC charging for address space? John Curran

Monday, 06 October

Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks Karl Denninger
Re: 971003:1520: Fiber-cut in Michigan Avi Freedman
Re: INTERNIC charging for address space? Joe Shaw
[NOOP] 24x7 NOC.. Joe Kawa
Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks Steve Mansfield
Re: The Cidr Report Phillip Vandry
[NOOP] 24x7 NOC.. Joe Kawa
Re: INTERNIC charging for address space? Michael Dillon
NANOG MEETING SCOTSDALE, AZ 0CT 27 & 28 Pam Ciesla
Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks Doug Davis
QoS/CoS interest (again) Paul Ferguson
Re: 971003:1520: Fiber-cut in Michigan Eric Germann
Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks Phil Howard
Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks Charles Sprickman

Tuesday, 07 October

Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks Dan Foster
Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks Karl Denninger
Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks Karl Denninger
SPAM attack on our support group Dennis Simpson
Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks Joe Shaw
Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks Joe Shaw
Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks James_deleskie
Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks Karl Denninger
Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks Eric Wieling
Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks Greg A. Woods
Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks Dale Drew
Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks Adrian Bool
Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks Alex Przekupowski
RE: QoS/CoS interest (again) & Fiber Cut .... Peter Cole
Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks John A. Tamplin
Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks Barney Wolff
Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks Mike Diehn
Your crystal and oscillator needs monkey2
Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks Kevin Smith
Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks ken emery
Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks Jay R. Ashworth
Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks David Lesher
Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks Jay R. Ashworth
Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks Kevin Smith
Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks Jay R. Ashworth
Tool Demos at NANOG Susan R. Harris
Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks Eric Wieling
IDT apologizes Len Rose
Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks Kevin Smith
Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks Alex Przekupowski
Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks John A. Tamplin
UUnet routes from hell.. Harold Willison
BGP? Robert Bowman
73K prefixes? Jonathan Heiliger
Rash assumptions about local telco policies Sean Donelan
Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks Dalvenjah FoxFire
Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks Eric Wieling
Re: 73K prefixes? David Schiffrin
Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks Brett Frankenberger
Mae-East Reboot? Deepak Jain
Re: 73K prefixes? Keith McCallion
Re: 73K prefixes? John Caruso
Re: 73K prefixes? Jonathan Heiliger
Re: UUnet routes from hell.. Justin W. Newton
Re: 73K prefixes? Chris A. Icide
Re: 73K prefixes? sasaki
Re: BGP? Sanjay Dani
Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks Jay R. Ashworth
Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks David Lesher
Re: 73K prefixes? Nathan Stratton
Re: 73K prefixes? Alex Rubenstein
UUNet Routing SNAFU prue
Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks Sean Donelan
Re: Mae-East Reboot? Alex Rubenstein
Re: 73K prefixes? John A. Tamplin
Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks John A. Tamplin
Re: Mae-East Reboot? J.D. Falk
Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks Sharif Torpis
Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks Alex "Mr. Worf" Yuriev
Re: Mae-East Reboot? Golan Ben-Oni
Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks Greg A. Woods
Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks David Lesher
Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks Sean Donelan

Wednesday, 08 October

Re: UUnet routes from hell.. brett watson
Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks Dale Drew
Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks Karl Denninger
multihome w/o BGP4 Richard Welty
Re: 73K prefixes? David Carmean
Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks Joe Shaw
Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks Joe Shaw
Re: multihome w/o BGP4 rhuey
Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Michael Dillon
Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Dorian R. Kim
Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Steve Meuse
Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Alec H. Peterson
Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU bmanning
Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Dorian R. Kim
Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Michael Dillon
Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Matt Ranney
Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU C. Harald Koch
Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Sean M. Doran
Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Kevin Oberman
Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Selina F. Priestley
Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU C. Harald Koch
Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Michael Dillon
Re: Mae-East Reboot? Justin W. Newton
Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Randy Bush
Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU blast
Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU blast
OSPF Vs EIGRP Patrick O'Keefe
Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks Barney Wolff
Re: OSPF Vs EIGRP Vijay Gill
Re: OSPF Vs EIGRP Shaun S. Amini
Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks Justin W. Newton
Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Neil J. McRae
Is 701 becoming 7007? cameo
Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks John A. Tamplin
Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks Matthew V. J. Whalen
Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Danny McPherson
Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks John A. Tamplin
Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Phil Howard
Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU David Carmean
Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Alec H. Peterson
Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks Jay R. Ashworth
Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU John A. Tamplin
Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Alec H. Peterson
Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks John A. Tamplin
Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks Jay R. Ashworth
Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU David R. Conrad
Filters Michael Dillon

Thursday, 09 October

Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Mark Milhollan
Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Miquel van Smoorenburg
Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Phil Howard
Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Steve Meuse
Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Jay Borkenhagen
Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU John Leddy
Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Mike Norris
Prefix filtering traditional A space (Was Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU) Mark Milhollan
Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU ken emery
Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Cengiz Alaettinoglu
Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Danny McPherson
Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Jay Borkenhagen
Problems with UUnet and Sprint peering Anthony Pardini
(Fwd) Re: Request for your advice narlar
Re: ATM (was Re: too many routes) Mr. Dana Hudes
Re: Problems with UUnet and Sprint peering Josh Beck
Emerging Technologies Patrick O'Keefe
Re: Problems with UUnet and Sprint peering Jon Lewis

Friday, 10 October

Re: Emerging Technologies Tony Li
Re: ATM (was Re: too many routes) Tony Li
Draft NANOG Agenda Susan R. Harris
Re: Mae-East Reboot? Avi Freedman
Re: 971010:1000PDT: Fiber-cut in Daytona, FL Wayne Bouchard
971010:1000PDT: Fiber-cut in Daytona, FL Chris Layne
Re: 971010:1000PDT: Fiber-cut in Daytona, FL Chris Wilson
The Cidr Report Tony Bates
RE: Mae-East Reboot? McElearney, Kevin
BGP tables Ben Kirkpatrick, ELI
Re: BGP tables Christian Nielsen
Re: BGP tables Alex Rubenstein
Sample dampening entry Bob Collie

Saturday, 11 October

Re: BGP tables miguel a.l. paraz
MAE-East Down better than up? Alex Bligh
Re: MAE-East Down better than up? Alec H. Peterson
Re: MAE-East Down better than up? Jon Lewis
Re: MAE-East Down better than up? Hank Nussbacher
Operational issue - mae-east Dave Rand
Re: BGP tables J.D. Falk
Re: Operational issue - mae-east Randy Bush
Re: BGP tables David Schmidt
Re: [NOOP] 24x7 NOC.. Todd Graham Lewis
Re: BGP tables Mark Tripod
Re: BGP tables Alex "Mr. Worf" Yuriev
Re: BGP tables Vlad
Re: BGP tables Alex Rubenstein
Re: BGP tables Alex Rubenstein

Monday, 13 October

Re: BGP tables [follow up] Ben Kirkpatrick, ELI
Looking Glass Source Mark Tripod
Have you been bought by a telco yet? Bradley Dunn
Re: BGP tables Miquel van Smoorenburg
Multihoming at same NAP/IX? Hank Nussbacher
Re: Multihoming at same NAP/IX? Avi Freedman
Fall 97 NANOG update... Rodney Joffe
NSI Bulletin 097-007 | Network Solutions emergency telephone number David H. Holtzman
Re: Have you been bought by a telco yet? Avi Freedman

Tuesday, 14 October

REMINDER NANOG MEETING Pam Ciesla
Re: Fall 97 NANOG update... Eric Sobocinski
Re: Fall 97 NANOG update... Marc Teichtahl

Wednesday, 15 October

NANOG MEETING - HELP Pam Ciesla
Draft Agenda, Part II: The Sequel Susan R. Harris

Friday, 17 October

Getting PING bombed... Doug Davis

Saturday, 18 October

CCBSs Per Gregers Bilse
Re: Getting PING bombed... Jared Mauch
Re: Getting PING bombed... Craig A. Huegen

Sunday, 19 October

Packet over SONet/SDH (POS) experience? William Allen Simpson
Hello startyour
Web Biz Universal Remove List Update postmaster
Re: Web Biz Universal Remove List Update Greg A. Woods
Re: Web Biz Universal Remove List Update J.D. Falk
Re: Web Biz Universal Remove List Update Craig A. Huegen
Speakers - 8th Maryland Workshop on High Speed Networks Account of Maryland Center for Telecommunications Research
Re: Web Biz Universal Remove List Update Jon Lewis
Re: Web Biz Universal Remove List Update Craig A. Huegen

Monday, 20 October

Re: Getting PING bombed... Chris A. Icide
Re: Web Biz Universal Remove List Update NetSurfer
Re: Getting PING bombed... Golan Ben-Oni
Re: Packet over SONet/SDH (POS) experience? Ran Atkinson
Syn flooding attacks Paulo Maffei
Re: Web Biz Universal Remove List Update Paul A Vixie
Re: Packet over SONet/SDH (POS) experience? William Allen Simpson
Re: Web Biz Universal Remove List Update stickybit
Re: Syn flooding attacks Phil Howard
Re: Web Biz Universal Remove List Update J.D. Falk
CNN - Justice seeks $1 million a day contempt fine against Microsoft - October 20, 1997 Hagai Yardeny
Re: Syn flooding attacks Jeffrey C. Ollie
Re: Syn flooding attacks Vern Paxson
Re: Syn flooding attacks Jim Shankland
Re: Syn flooding attacks Perry E. Metzger
CNN - Justice seeks $1 million a day contempt fine against Microsoft - October 20, 1997 Hagai Yardeny
Re: CNN - Justice seeks $1 million a day contempt fine against Microsoft - October 20, 1997 Randy Bush
Re: CNN - Justice seeks $1 million a day contempt fine against Microsoft - October 20, 1997 Perry E. Metzger
Re: CNN - Justice seeks $1 million a day contempt fine against Microsoft - October 20, 1997 Karl Denninger
Re: Syn flooding attacks Joe Shaw
Re: Syn flooding attacks Perry E. Metzger
Re: CNN - Justice seeks $1 million a day contempt fine against Microsoft - October 20, 1997 Dennis Simpson
Re: Web Biz Universal Remove List Update Richard Welty
Re: Syn flooding attacks Peter Evans
Re: CNN - Justice seeks $1 million a day contempt fine against Microsoft - October 20, 1997 Michael Kindig - Compute Intensive
Re: Web Biz Universal Remove List Update Paul A Vixie
Looking for "National" NAPs Sean Donelan
Re: Looking for "National" NAPs Bill Manning
Re: Looking for "National" NAPs Robert Bowman

Tuesday, 21 October

Re: CNN - Justice seeks $1 million a day contempt fine against Microsoft - October 20, 1997 Leigh Porter
Re: CNN - Justice seeks $1 million a day contempt fine against Microsoft - October 20, 1997 Jay R. Ashworth
Re: Web Biz Universal Remove List Update Jon Lewis
Re: Web Biz Universal Remove List Update Steve Mansfield
Does NANOG hate Microsoft? Jay R. Ashworth
Re: Syn flooding attacks Kenneth E. Gray
Operational issue (Mae-west) Dave Rand
Possible topic? Justin W. Newton
Re: Possible topic? Richard Irving
Re: Possible topic? Dorian R. Kim
Re: Possible topic? Craig A. Huegen
Re: Possible topic? Richard Irving
Re: Possible topic? Paul G. Donner
Re: Possible topic? Dorian R. Kim
Re: Possible topic? Deepak Jain
Re: Possible topic? Craig A. Huegen
Re: Possible topic? Roy
Re: Possible topic? Randy Bush
Re: Possible topic? Vadim Antonov
Re: Possible topic? Snowdog
Re: Possible topic? Dorian R. Kim
Re: Possible topic? Wayne Bouchard
Re: Possible topic? Wayne Bouchard
Re: Possible topic? J.D. Falk
Re: Possible topic? Steven Schnell
Which pipe dream should we be smoking? (was Re: Possible topic?) J.D. Falk
Re: Possible topic? Alan Hannan
Re: Which pipe dream should we be smoking? (was Re: Possible topic?) Vadim Antonov
Re: Which pipe dream should we be smoking? (was Re: Possible topic?) Alan Hannan
Re: Which pipe dream should we be smoking? (was Re: Possible topic?) Vadim Antonov
Re: Which pipe dream should we be smoking? (was Re: Possible topic?) Peter Lothberg
Re: Possible topic? Alex Rubenstein
Re: Which pipe dream should we be smoking? (was Re: Possible topic?) Alex Rubenstein
Re: Which pipe dream should we be smoking? (was Re: Possible topic?) Deepak Jain
Re: Which pipe dream should we be smoking? (was Re: Possible topic?) Vadim Antonov
Re: Which pipe dream should we be smoking? (was Re: Possible topic?) Joseph Malcolm
Re: Which pipe dream should we be smoking? (was Re: Possible topic?) Joseph Kucic

Wednesday, 22 October

Re: Which pipe dream should we be smoking? (was Re: Possible topic?) Alec H. Peterson
Re: Possible topic? Alex Bligh
Re: Which pipe dream should we be smoking? (was Re: Possible topic?) Steven Schnell
Re: Which pipe dream should we be smoking? David Lesher
Re: Which pipe dream should we be smoking? (was Re: Possible topic?) Steven Schnell
Re: Possible topic? Jessica Yu
Sprint NAP Jason Vanick
Exchange point stats info Jeremy Porter
Re: Exchange point stats info bmanning
Re: Exchange point stats info Subodh Nijsure
Re: Sprint NAP Vab Goel
Re: Exchange point stats info bmanning
Re: Sprint NAP Reid Fishler
Real statistics (was Re: Possible topic?) J.D. Falk
Re: Possible topic? Snowdog
Re: Possible topic? Mike Leber
Re: Real statistics (was Re: Possible topic?) Jessica Yu
Re: Which pipe dream should we be smoking? (was Re: Possible topic?) Sharif Torpis
Host for NANOG 12 William B. Norton
NetSurvey Cable Modem Survey... Qualify for FREE Service! NetSurvey

Thursday, 23 October

NAP Architecture Vijay Gill
Re: NAP Architecture bmanning
Re: NAP Architecture Chris A. Icide
something of interest to gated users Paul A Vixie
Re: Operational issue (Mae-west) or Mae-East Kachun Lee
Re: Operational issue (Mae-west) or Mae-East Shahin Bakhshandeh
Re: Operational issue (Mae-west) or Mae-East Deepak Jain
Re: Operational issue (Mae-west) or Mae-East Dave Rand
Reminder for Phoenix NANOG Rodney Joffe

Friday, 24 October

Re: NAP Architecture Neil J. McRae
Re: NAP Architecture Vijay Gill
Business Opportunity cvn1
Re: NAP Architecture Alec H. Peterson
Re: NAP Architecture Neil J. McRae
Re: NAP Architecture Vijay Gill
Re: Business Opportunity David Carmean
Re: Business Opportunity Alex Kinch
The Cidr Report Tony Bates
Re: Business Opportunity Syed M. Irfan Ashraf
Re: Business Opportunity David Carmean
Re: Business Opportunity Harold Willison
Re: Business Opportunity Ron Buchalski
mbone at nanog brett watson
Re: Business Opportunity Bradley Reynolds
address blocks for nanog brett watson
mbone at nanog (again) brett watson
OK. Alex Rubenstein
Re: OK. Jay Stewart
Re: OK. Alec H. Peterson
Re: OK. Todd R. Stroup

Saturday, 25 October

Re: OK. Alan Hannan
Re: OK. Dale Drew
mbone and realvideo brett watson
Re: mbone and realvideo Derek Andree
Re: mbone and realvideo Jeffrey C. Ollie
nanog event Alex Rubenstein
Re: nanog event andrew khoo
Re: mbone and realvideo Nicholas Bastin
Re: OK. Mark Tripod
Re: mbone and realvideo ken emery
router monitoring brett watson
Re: Possible topic? Avi Freedman
Re: Possible topic? Avi Freedman
Pre-NANOG tutorial on routing on the web... Avi Freedman

Sunday, 26 October

Re: OK. Todd R. Stroup
Re: router monitoring J.D. Falk
Mbone help at NANOG 11. Rodney Joffe

Monday, 27 October

Re: OK. Leigh Porter
cisco rsh enable Steve Lalonde
Agenda for Interprovider Ops BOF at NANOG 11 Jake Khuon
FCC proposes V-Chip for computers, from Time/Netly News Declan McCullagh
Operational: MAE-WEST Dave Rand
LATE NOTICE: NANOG MBONE BROADCAST SET UP AND NOW BEING BROADCAST k claffy

Tuesday, 28 October

Spam Control Considered Harmful Daniel Karrenberg
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Jason Vanick
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Chris MacFarlane
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful David Mercer
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Jay R. Ashworth
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Don Stacy
OFF TOPIC: where are spam control lists? Phil Howard
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Alex Bligh
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Barry Shein
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Scott Hazen Mueller
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Barry Shein
RE: Spam Control Considered Harmful Jordan Mendelson
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Phil Lawlor
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful J.D. Falk
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Bill Hogan
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Jay R. Ashworth
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Jay R. Ashworth
Rwhois and SWIP Wilson Chu
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Jay R. Ashworth
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Rik Schneider
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Rik Schneider
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Phil Lawlor
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Jay R. Ashworth
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful David Bowie
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Perry E. Metzger
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Martin Cox
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Rik Schneider
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful J.D. Falk
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Todd R. Stroup
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Martin Cox
Re: Rwhois and SWIP Joe Provo - Network Architect
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Jay R. Ashworth
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Jay R. Ashworth
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Phil Lawlor
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Barry Shein
IP spoofing and spamming Hank Nussbacher
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Phil Lawlor
Re: IP spoofing and spamming Karl Denninger
Re: IP spoofing and spamming J.D. Falk
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Jay R. Ashworth
Re: IP spoofing and spamming Hank Nussbacher
Re: IP spoofing and spamming Dalvenjah FoxFire
Re: IP spoofing and spamming Hank Nussbacher
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Karl Denninger
Re: IP spoofing and spamming Karl Denninger
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Phil Howard
Re: NAP Architecture Kent W. England
Re: IP spoofing and spamming Stephen Dolloff
Re: IP spoofing and spamming Dale Drew
Re: IP spoofing and spamming Jon Lewis
Re: IP spoofing and spamming Steve Mansfield
RE: Spam Control Considered Harmful Jon Lewis

Wednesday, 29 October

Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Richard Welty
Re: NAP Architecture Ben Kirkpatrick, ELI
Re: NAP Architecture bmanning
Re: NAP Architecture the Riz
Re: NAP Architecture Dave Rand
Re: NAP Architecture Dave Rand
Re: NAP Architecture Ben Kirkpatrick, ELI
Re: NAP Architecture Alec H. Peterson
Re: NAP Architecture Richard Mataka
Re: IP spoofing and spamming Jeremy Porter
Tracking SPAM (Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful) Mark Milhollan
Re: NAP Architecture Leigh Porter
Re: IP spoofing and spamming Alan Hannan
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Cal Thixton - President - ThoughtPort Authority of Chicago
Re: NAP Architecture Dave Rand
Re: NAP Architecture Deepak Jain
Re: IP spoofing and spamming Sean Donelan
RE: NAP Architecture Rodney Joffe
Re: NAP Architecture Jay R. Ashworth
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Matt Ryan
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful John A. Tamplin
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Scott Hazen Mueller
Re: NAP Architecture Ben Kirkpatrick, ELI
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Dannyman
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Barry Shein
Re: Tracking SPAM (Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful) Phil Lawlor
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Phil Lawlor
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Dalvenjah FoxFire
Re: Tracking SPAM (Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful) J.D. Falk
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful John A. Tamplin
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Derek Andree
SPAM, IEMMC, and Caller ID Steve Sobol
Re: NAP Architecture Mike Leber
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Phil Lawlor
Re: Operational: MAE-WEST Justin W. Newton
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Cal Thixton - President - ThoughtPort Authority of Chicago
Re: SPAM, IEMMC, and Caller ID Brian Moore
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Jay R. Ashworth
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Jay R. Ashworth
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Jay R. Ashworth
Re: SPAM, IEMMC, and Caller ID Phil Lawlor
Re: Tracking SPAM (Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful) Jay R. Ashworth
Re: NAP Architecture Alex Rubenstein
Re: SPAM, IEMMC, and Caller ID Brian Moore
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful John A. Tamplin
Re: SPAM, IEMMC, and Caller ID Dannyman
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Jay R. Ashworth
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Dannyman
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Greg A. Woods
Re: SPAM, IEMMC, and Caller ID John A. Tamplin
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Dorn Hetzel
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Dannyman
Re: Tracking SPAM (Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful) Greg A. Woods
Re: SPAM, IEMMC, and Caller ID Brian Moore
Re: NAP Architecture Bill Manning
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Greg A. Woods
Re: NAP Architecture Dave Rand
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Jon Lewis
Re: SPAM, IEMMC, and Caller ID Greg A. Woods
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Greg A. Woods
RE: NAP Architecture Rodney Joffe
Re: NAP Architecture Bill Manning
RE: NAP Architecture Chad Skidmore

Thursday, 30 October

RE: Spam Control Considered Harmful Paul Peterson
RE: Spam Control Considered Harmful Paul Peterson
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Matt Ryan
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Peter Galbavy
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Peter Galbavy
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Matt Ryan
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Paul Flores
Re: NAP Architecture Alex Rubenstein
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Joe Provo - Network Architect
Re: NAP Architecture Alex Rubenstein
Re: NAP Architecture bmanning
Re: NAP Architecture Alex Rubenstein
Re: NAP Architecture bmanning
Enforcable AUPs David Hares - AutoNet
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Jay R. Ashworth
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Brian W. Pendleton
Link to Scams: On the Net Onthenet
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Joe Shaw
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful John A. Tamplin
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Phillip Vandry
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Cal Thixton - President - ThoughtPort Authority of Chicago
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Turnando Fuad
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Cal Thixton - President - ThoughtPort Authority of Chicago
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Steve Sobol
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Justin W. Newton
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Justin W. Newton
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Barry Shein
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Justin W. Newton
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Jay R. Ashworth
Spammer web harvesting tool countermeasures Jay R. Ashworth
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Greg A. Woods
Re: Spammer web harvesting tool countermeasures Jon Stevens
Problems with specific routing policies for each exchange point Mark Tripod
Re: Spammer web harvesting tool countermeasures Deepak Jain
Re: Spammer web harvesting tool countermeasures Jon Stevens
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Alan Hannan
Re: Spammer web harvesting tool countermeasures Deepak Jain
RE: Operational: MAE-WEST Chris Fairbanks
RE: Spam Control Considered Harmful Jon Lewis
Re: Problems with specific routing policies for each exchange point Jake Khuon
RE: Spammer web harvesting tool countermeasures Jamie Scheinblum
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Jon Lewis
Final Program - 8 Maryland Workshop on High Speed Networks Account of Maryland Center for Telecommunications Research
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Jon Lewis
Final Program - 8 Maryland Workshop on High Speed Networks Account of Maryland Center for Telecommunications Research
RE: Operational: MAE-WEST Todd R. Stroup
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Greg A. Woods
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Greg A. Woods
potentially profitable spam countermeasures Erik E. Fair
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Greg A. Woods

Friday, 31 October

Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Peter Galbavy
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Art Houle
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Phil Howard
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful John R. Levine
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful John A. Tamplin
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful John A. Tamplin
Re: potentially profitable spam countermeasures Peter E. Giza
Kashpureff in custody. Marc Hurst
(forw) Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Patrick Lynch
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Bill Unsworth
Boy are we off-topic...was Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Jon Lewis
Re: Problems with specific routing policies for each exchange point Kevin Oberman
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Mike Norris
to control spam let's break the net? Robert Laughlin
Re: potentially profitable spam countermeasures Eric Germann
Re: Problems with specific routing policies for each exchange point Randy Bush
Re: Problems with specific routing policies for each exchange point Robert Bowman
Re: Problems with specific routing policies for each exchange point Kevin Oberman
Re: Problems with specific routing policies for each exchange point Kevin Oberman
Re: Problems with specific routing policies for each exchange point Randy Bush
Re: Problems with specific routing policies for each exchange point Cengiz Alaettinoglu
Re: Problems with specific routing policies for each exchange point Cengiz Alaettinoglu
Re: Problems with specific routing policies for each exchange point Danny McPherson
Re: Problems with specific routing policies for each exchange point Abha Ahuja
Re: Problems with specific routing policies for each exchange point Jake Khuon
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Greg A. Woods
Re: potentially profitable spam countermeasures Greg A. Woods
Thoughts on spam control Patrick Lynch
The Cidr Report Tony Bates
Re: to control spam let's break the net? Greg A. Woods
Re: Problems with specific routing policies for each exchange point Jake Khuon
Re: Problems with specific routing policies for each exchange point Abha Ahuja
Re: Problems with specific routing policies for each exchange point Randy Bush
Re: Problems with specific routing policies for each exchange point Abha Ahuja
Re: Problems with specific routing policies for each exchange point Randy Bush
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful NetSurfer
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Greg A. Woods
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful NetSurfer

Previous period

Next period