nanog mailing list archives

Re: NAP Architecture


From: "Jay R. Ashworth" <jra () scfn thpl lib fl us>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 1997 14:46:08 -0500

On Wed, Oct 29, 1997 at 09:30:59AM -0800, Ben Kirkpatrick, ELI wrote:
Yes, by competition.  A smaller telco should offer a better rate at nearby
sites.  However, then you loose whatever you invested in getting a rack at
each NAP.

Well, yeah; but I think the question was: how do they justify that
price?  Anything _more_ useful than "what the amrket will bear"?

--Ben Kirkpatrick
"Consciousness: that annoying time between naps."

This wasn't an _intentional_ pun, right? :-)

PS: Probable ELI OC192 cut 25miles south of Seattle (again).  Who's laying
new fiber on the I-5 corridor and running us over?

_192_?

Wow.  Even _I_ don't make mistakes that big...

Cheers,
-- jra
-- 
Jay R. Ashworth                                                jra () baylink com
Member of the Technical Staff             Unsolicited Commercial Emailers Sued
The Suncoast Freenet      "Pedantry.  It's not just a job, it's an
Tampa Bay, Florida          adventure."  -- someone on AFU      +1 813 790 7592


Current thread: