nanog mailing list archives
Re: Web Biz Universal Remove List Update
From: stickybit <linneweh () concentric net>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 1997 10:11:06 -0700
Do it as a matter of policy, no user likes spam mail, I fought that for years on the birdsong nntp server /hrl NetSurfer wrote:
Would there be legal issues if the peers at the NAP/MAE etc. simply discarded traffic from the known spammer netblocks such as thehitman.com based on an acceptable use policy that prohibits sites which support spammer business? If traffic can't make it to their web sites it would make it harder to earn $ off spam even if the spam is sent from disposable accounts. - James Wilson netsurf () pixi com
Current thread:
- Re: Web Biz Universal Remove List Update, (continued)
- Re: Web Biz Universal Remove List Update Greg A. Woods (Oct 19)
- Re: Web Biz Universal Remove List Update J.D. Falk (Oct 19)
- Re: Web Biz Universal Remove List Update Craig A. Huegen (Oct 19)
- Re: Web Biz Universal Remove List Update Jon Lewis (Oct 19)
- Re: Web Biz Universal Remove List Update Craig A. Huegen (Oct 19)
- Re: Web Biz Universal Remove List Update J.D. Falk (Oct 20)
- Re: Web Biz Universal Remove List Update Steve Mansfield (Oct 21)
- Re: Web Biz Universal Remove List Update Jon Lewis (Oct 21)
- Re: Web Biz Universal Remove List Update Craig A. Huegen (Oct 19)
- Re: Web Biz Universal Remove List Update NetSurfer (Oct 20)
- Re: Web Biz Universal Remove List Update Paul A Vixie (Oct 20)
- Re: Web Biz Universal Remove List Update stickybit (Oct 20)
- Re: Web Biz Universal Remove List Update Richard Welty (Oct 20)
- Re: Web Biz Universal Remove List Update Paul A Vixie (Oct 20)