nanog mailing list archives
Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks
From: "John A. Tamplin" <jat () traveller com>
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 1997 17:33:20 -0500 (CDT)
On Tue, 7 Oct 1997, Kevin Smith wrote:
MBID is reported when the MAX/TNT does NOT receive the caller-number, so I would question if BellSouth can disable Caller-ID....also you could do a PRI D-channel trace on the MAX of the incoming call to verify the contents - i.e. see if the caller-ID info element is included.
We initially didn't specify anything about getting ANI/DNIS information, and we got it on our BellSouth PRIs. At some point later, we ordered more and they asked us if we wanted that information and we said yes. On the next bill, we were getting charged an outrageous amount for this service, and we called and asked why we weren't being billed for it on other lines, and they said that we didn't have that service on the other lines. So, we told them to turn off that service on the new lines. It was removed from our bill, but we still got the information in the call setup messages. Thus, I assumed from this that BellSouth did not have the ability to enable/disable that information on PRIs (I assume that the switches, which have been 5ESS or DMS, have that ability but BellSouth either chooses not to or does not know how to disable it). The similar situation is present on ISDN BRIs -- they will happily charge you extra for CallerID, but if you tell them you don't want it you still get it. John Tamplin Traveller Information Services jat () Traveller COM 2104 West Ferry Way 205/883-4233x7007 Huntsville, AL 35801
Current thread:
- Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks, (continued)
- Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks Dale Drew (Oct 07)
- Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks Eric Wieling (Oct 07)
- Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks Adrian Bool (Oct 07)
- Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks Alex Przekupowski (Oct 07)
- Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks John A. Tamplin (Oct 07)
- Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks Mike Diehn (Oct 07)
- Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks ken emery (Oct 07)
- Message not available
- Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks Jay R. Ashworth (Oct 07)
- Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks Eric Wieling (Oct 07)
- Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks Kevin Smith (Oct 07)
- Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks John A. Tamplin (Oct 07)
- Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks Kevin Smith (Oct 07)
- Message not available
- Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks Jay R. Ashworth (Oct 07)
- Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks Kevin Smith (Oct 07)
- Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks Alex Przekupowski (Oct 07)
- Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks Eric Wieling (Oct 07)
- Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks Joe Shaw (Oct 08)
- Message not available
- Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks Jay R. Ashworth (Oct 07)
- Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks David Lesher (Oct 07)
- Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks Dalvenjah FoxFire (Oct 07)
- Message not available
- Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks Jay R. Ashworth (Oct 07)