nanog mailing list archives

Re: UUnet routes from hell..


From: brett watson <bwatson () genuity net>
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 1997 00:51:46 -0700



Uhm, yeah.  It seems they decided that they wanted 128.0.0.0/9 or so, and
decided that the easiest way to get it is announce it all as /24's.  Spiffy.

At least it was fixed relatively quickly.

  the question remains, was this a bug in some version of their code? 
 or could someone have actually mis-configured something this 
drastically?

-brett





Current thread: