nanog mailing list archives
Re: Problems with specific routing policies for each exchange point
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 97 08:25 PST
I must admit that I do not see the reason for using AS macros in rs-in and rs-out statements. As far as I know these statements merely control which AS peers will receive your routes from the route server and vice-versa. Since these are direct peers with the route server, I can't see the need to put anything other than specific AS numbers into the rs-in and rs-out lines.
One can use the same AS-macro in the inet-rtr.rs(in|out): as in a policy in aut-num.as-(in|out):. randy
Current thread:
- Problems with specific routing policies for each exchange point Mark Tripod (Oct 30)
- Re: Problems with specific routing policies for each exchange point Jake Khuon (Oct 30)
- Re: Problems with specific routing policies for each exchange point Kevin Oberman (Oct 31)
- Re: Problems with specific routing policies for each exchange point Randy Bush (Oct 31)
- Re: Problems with specific routing policies for each exchange point Kevin Oberman (Oct 31)
- Re: Problems with specific routing policies for each exchange point Randy Bush (Oct 31)
- Re: Problems with specific routing policies for each exchange point Abha Ahuja (Oct 31)
- Re: Problems with specific routing policies for each exchange point Randy Bush (Oct 31)
- Re: Problems with specific routing policies for each exchange point Abha Ahuja (Oct 31)
- Re: Problems with specific routing policies for each exchange point Randy Bush (Oct 31)
- Re: Problems with specific routing policies for each exchange point Kevin Oberman (Oct 31)
- Re: Problems with specific routing policies for each exchange point Jake Khuon (Oct 30)
- Re: Problems with specific routing policies for each exchange point Robert Bowman (Oct 31)
- Re: Problems with specific routing policies for each exchange point Kevin Oberman (Oct 31)
- Re: Problems with specific routing policies for each exchange point Jake Khuon (Oct 31)