nanog mailing list archives
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
From: Phillip Vandry <vandry () Mlink NET>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 1997 14:52:16 -0500 (EST)
How about a new RFC outlining a method of dynamically delivering a relay host native to whatever service provider you dial in to ?? That way, any e-mail can be traced to a supposedly responsible end-user by the victimized ISP ??
Better: The user to specifies "smtp" or "mail" as their mail server and picks up the apropriate search domain from the local ISP. Works for NNTP too! -Phil
Current thread:
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful, (continued)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Scott Hazen Mueller (Oct 29)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Justin W. Newton (Oct 30)
- RE: Spam Control Considered Harmful Paul Peterson (Oct 30)
- RE: Spam Control Considered Harmful Jon Lewis (Oct 30)
- RE: Spam Control Considered Harmful Paul Peterson (Oct 30)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Peter Galbavy (Oct 30)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Jon Lewis (Oct 30)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Peter Galbavy (Oct 31)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful John A. Tamplin (Oct 31)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Mike Norris (Oct 31)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Peter Galbavy (Oct 30)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Scott Hazen Mueller (Oct 29)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Turnando Fuad (Oct 30)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Justin W. Newton (Oct 30)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Alan Hannan (Oct 30)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Steve Sobol (Oct 30)
- Message not available
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Jay R. Ashworth (Oct 30)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Phil Howard (Oct 31)