nanog mailing list archives
Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU
From: "John A. Tamplin" <jat () traveller com>
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 1997 22:22:43 -0500 (CDT)
On Wed, 8 Oct 1997, Danny McPherson wrote:
And since I helped *create* the CA*net database *and* the CA*net route filters based on the various DBs, yes, I meant RADB.How many providers actually apply prefix-based filtering (based on IRR objects) to other providers? I like the idea of prefix-based filtering applied to customers (by everyone that claims to be tier 1 & 2 (&3), at the very least), as well as the idea of configuring static filters for /19s and such, but if I were to build 46K++ lines of ACLs to filter prefixes from all eBGP peers for all registered prefixes (from several different registries) .. my routers wouldn't be manageable.
We filter prefixes on BGP customer links and peers, but not with upstream providers (obviously). RtConfig is very useful for automatically building such configurations, although in our case we are rather small scale. John Tamplin Traveller Information Services jat () Traveller COM 2104 West Ferry Way 205/883-4233x7007 Huntsville, AL 35801
Current thread:
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU, (continued)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Sean M. Doran (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU David Carmean (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Alec H. Peterson (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU David R. Conrad (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU C. Harald Koch (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Kevin Oberman (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Selina F. Priestley (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU C. Harald Koch (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU John A. Tamplin (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Cengiz Alaettinoglu (Oct 09)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Phil Howard (Oct 09)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Steve Meuse (Oct 09)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU ken emery (Oct 09)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Jay Borkenhagen (Oct 09)