nanog mailing list archives
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
From: Phil Lawlor <phil () agis net>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 1997 15:41:25 -0500
At 02:34 PM 10/28/97 -0500, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
Properly configured sendmail's do this, mostly.
^^^^^^ I am not a sendmail expert, but I am told that it is in the forgery area that it could be improved. Forgery and relay hijacking seem to be the largest areas of abuse. If these areas could be improved, it could go a long way to solving the problem. Phil Lawlor President AGIS Voice - 313-730-1130 Fax - 313-563-6119
Current thread:
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful, (continued)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Phil Lawlor (Oct 28)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Karl Denninger (Oct 28)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Phil Howard (Oct 28)
- Message not available
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Jay R. Ashworth (Oct 28)
- Message not available
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Jay R. Ashworth (Oct 28)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Phil Lawlor (Oct 28)
- Message not available
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Jay R. Ashworth (Oct 28)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Phil Lawlor (Oct 28)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful David Bowie (Oct 28)
- Message not available
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Jay R. Ashworth (Oct 28)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Phil Lawlor (Oct 28)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Richard Welty (Oct 29)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful John A. Tamplin (Oct 29)
- Message not available
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Justin W. Newton (Oct 30)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Greg A. Woods (Oct 30)