nanog mailing list archives
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
From: Phil Lawlor <phil () agis net>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 1997 19:27:49 -0500
At 06:32 PM 10/28/97 -0500, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
Indeed. As we noted last month on the topic of ingress filtering, you have to catch this stuff on the _intake_ side, to have any real hope of spotting the offenders.
Back to sender verification (equivalent of caller ID). This would allow better reporting of AUP violations to the sending domain from the receiving domain. Logs could be used to document the violation. Phil Lawlor President AGIS Voice - 313-730-1130 Fax - 313-563-6119
Current thread:
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Jay R. Ashworth (Oct 28)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Chris MacFarlane (Oct 28)
- Message not available
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Jay R. Ashworth (Oct 28)
- Message not available
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Alex Bligh (Oct 28)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Phil Lawlor (Oct 28)
- Message not available
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Jay R. Ashworth (Oct 28)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Phil Lawlor (Oct 28)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful David Bowie (Oct 28)
- Message not available
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Jay R. Ashworth (Oct 28)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Phil Lawlor (Oct 28)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Richard Welty (Oct 29)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful John A. Tamplin (Oct 29)
- Message not available
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Justin W. Newton (Oct 30)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Greg A. Woods (Oct 30)
- RE: Spam Control Considered Harmful Jon Lewis (Oct 28)