nanog mailing list archives
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
From: Matt Ryan <matt () planet net uk>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 1997 20:29:52 GMT
This sounds nice and principled but who is going to pay the bill for the spam? It's non-trivial.
The spammers pay by hooking up with an ISP. How do your customers pay the recipients of their messages for them downloading them? Have you not noticed that email delivery is a cooperative process? Matt. -- Matt Ryan - Network Engineer matt () planet net uk Planet OnLine Ltd, The White House, Tel: +44 113 2345566 Melbourne Street, Leeds, LS2 7PS, UK Fax: +44 113 2240003
Current thread:
- Spam Control Considered Harmful Daniel Karrenberg (Oct 28)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Jason Vanick (Oct 28)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful David Mercer (Oct 28)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Barry Shein (Oct 28)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Don Stacy (Oct 28)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Barry Shein (Oct 28)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Matt Ryan (Oct 29)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Dannyman (Oct 29)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Greg A. Woods (Oct 29)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Dannyman (Oct 29)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Dorn Hetzel (Oct 29)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Dannyman (Oct 29)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Matt Ryan (Oct 29)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Matt Ryan (Oct 30)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Barry Shein (Oct 29)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Matt Ryan (Oct 30)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Paul Flores (Oct 30)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Jon Lewis (Oct 30)