nanog mailing list archives
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
From: Steve Sobol <sjsobol () devel nacs net>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 1997 16:29:25 -0500
On Thu, Oct 30, 1997 at 12:20:04PM -0500, Brian W. Pendleton wrote:
I agree that spam is a problem but one that the industry can regulate on its own.
The problem is that many ISP's and several backbones do not regulate it. -- NACS.NET ** Steve Sobol (sjsobol @ nacs.net) *** 216 619-2000, 1-888-273-NACS Tech Support, Programming, Postmaster, DNS dude, Real-Live Human Abuse Auto- Responder & Spam Fighter who is waiting for his Netscum Page. (Where is it, Boursy??) ** http://www.nacs.net ** Net Abuse Hotline: abuse @ nacs.net
Current thread:
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful, (continued)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Jon Lewis (Oct 30)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Peter Galbavy (Oct 31)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful John A. Tamplin (Oct 31)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Mike Norris (Oct 31)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Turnando Fuad (Oct 30)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Justin W. Newton (Oct 30)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Alan Hannan (Oct 30)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Steve Sobol (Oct 30)
- Message not available
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Jay R. Ashworth (Oct 30)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Phil Howard (Oct 31)