nanog mailing list archives
Re: IP spoofing and spamming
From: Hank Nussbacher <hank () ibm net il>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 1997 03:44:56 +0200
At 05:30 PM 10/28/97 -0800, J.D. Falk wrote:
Are you under any contractural obligation to transit that IP address? The user in question seems to think you are, but you should check that as well; most contracts that I've seen do not mention multihoming specificially, and this could be the perfect loophole for you to use while you give him the 30 days notice or whatever it takes to disconnect him completely.
Lawyers have a funny way of reading contracts. Some read them that anything not spelled out is allowed, whereas others read them that anything not spelled is not allowed. I guess ISPs on NANOG should be aware of this new spam/ip-spoofing method when writing contracts with their clients. -Hank
********************************************************* J.D. Falk voice: +1-650-482-2840 Supervisor, Network Operations fax: +1-650-482-2844 PRIORI NETWORKS, INC. http://www.priori.net "The People You Know. The People You Trust." *********************************************************
Current thread:
- Re: IP spoofing and spamming, (continued)
- Re: IP spoofing and spamming J.D. Falk (Oct 28)
- Re: IP spoofing and spamming Dalvenjah FoxFire (Oct 28)
- Re: IP spoofing and spamming Stephen Dolloff (Oct 28)
- Re: IP spoofing and spamming Dale Drew (Oct 28)
- Re: IP spoofing and spamming Jon Lewis (Oct 28)
- Re: IP spoofing and spamming Hank Nussbacher (Oct 28)
- Re: IP spoofing and spamming Karl Denninger (Oct 28)
- Re: IP spoofing and spamming Steve Mansfield (Oct 28)
- Re: IP spoofing and spamming Alan Hannan (Oct 29)
- Re: IP spoofing and spamming Jeremy Porter (Oct 29)
- Re: IP spoofing and spamming Hank Nussbacher (Oct 28)
- Re: IP spoofing and spamming Sean Donelan (Oct 29)